Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Middleton Parish Church School

Inspected 11 Oct 2013 · published 30 Oct 2013 · URN 105821

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Firth, Pamela Hemphill, Robert Birtwell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    M24 5DL

  • Name on report verified

    Middleton Parish Church School

  • URN verified

    105821

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressoutstandingeffectivelygood progresshigh expectationsimprovedeffectivevery well
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatenot strongtoo fewrequires improvementpoorseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1473w+51
  • Leadership698w+38
  • What needs to improve163w+71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,245
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Middleton Parish Church School Springfield Road, Middleton, Manchester, Lancashire, M24 5DL

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils achieve well and make good progress across the school, including disabled pupils, those who have special educational needs and those eligible for support from pupil premium funding.  Teaching is good. Teachers know pupils well and have high expectations. The teaching of writing has improved since the last inspection and this has raised achievement.  Better systems have been introduced to monitor pupils’ progress and these have helped to improve teaching and raise achievement.  Pupils receive good support and help when they need it.  Behaviour is good. Pupils enjoy coming to school and are keen to learn. They get on well with their teachers and with each other and feel safe in school.  School leaders, including governors, have a clear idea of how well the school is doing and where it needs to improve. They have secured improvements to teaching and achievement.  Parents are very supportive of the school.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Achievement in reading is not as strong as in writing and mathematics.  Teachers do not always ensure that all pupils are consistently challenged to reach the highest levels and make the best possible progress, especially the most-able pupils.  Teachers do not always ask challenging questions that lead to pupils having a deeper understanding of their work.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage, staff do not always plan enough focus and structure to learning activities, and do not share their observations enough to identify the next steps in children’s learning.  There are too few opportunities for teachers to share best practice within the school, or to observe outstanding teaching in other schools.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 22 lessons or part lessons, including one joint observation with the headteacher.  Inspectors held meetings with school leaders and managers and with four governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors also met a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors held discussions with two groups of pupils and spoke informally to other pupils in lessons and during break and lunchtime.  Inspectors looked at the work pupils were completing in lessons and in their books over time. They listened to pupils read and talked to them about their enjoyment of reading.  Inspectors observed the work of the school and examined a number of documents. These included recorded data concerning pupils’ current achievement, the quality of teaching and the school development plan. Inspectors also looked at records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding arrangements. Minutes of governing body meetings and the school adviser’s

p.2

Information about this inspection

reports were also considered.  Inspectors considered 30 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), and 31 responses to the staff questionnaire.  Only four Year 6 pupils were present during the inspection as the rest were taking part in a residential outdoor activities visit.

p.2

Inspection team

Robert Birtwell, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Pamela Hemphill Additional Inspector Jennifer Firth Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is larger than the average-sized primary school.  The school is expanding from one-form entry to two-form entry.  Pupils are taught in nine single-year-group classes from Reception to Year 6.  Almost all pupils are from White British backgrounds.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children looked after by the local authority and children from service families) is below average.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs who are supported at school action is below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is approximately average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement so that an even greater proportion of pupils makes more than the expected rate of progress by:  ensuring that work is always closely matched to all pupils’ needs, particularly the most-able pupils, so that they are consistently challenged to reach the highest levels and make the best possible progress  improving pupils’ attainment and progress in reading so that they at least match those in writing and mathematics.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching and learning across the school by:  making sure that teachers always ask challenging questions that deepen pupils’ understanding  sharing existing best practice more widely across the school and providing more opportunities for teachers to observe outstanding teaching in other schools.  Improve teaching and learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage by:  ensuring that there is always a clear focus and structure to learning opportunities in all activities  making sure that staff share observations more effectively to identify the next steps in children’s learning.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with knowledge and skills that are generally below those expected for their age. They make good progress overall and are well prepared to enter Key Stage 1 with standards that are much closer to the national average.  Pupils make good progress throughout Key Stage 1. At the end of Year 2, they attain broadly average standards in reading, writing and mathematics.  Pupils continue to make good progress in Key Stage 2. Achievement in English and mathematics has been rising for the past two years and is now above average. In 2013, all Year 6 pupils made at least the expected rates of progress in writing and mathematics. The proportion who made more-than-expected progress was above average in writing and average in mathematics. In reading, pupils’ achievement and progress were just below average.  The school’s tracking information shows that pupils make good progress and achieve well

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

throughout the school, whatever their starting points. This includes pupils who are eligible for support through pupil premium funding and those who are disabled or have special educational needs. This is supported by inspection evidence from lesson observations and work in pupils’ books.  Although pupils make good progress, the proportion who make better-than-expected progress could be greater, especially for the most-able pupils.  Reading is taught effectively. Pupils have regular opportunities to read and teachers and teaching assistants make sure that pupils have a good knowledge of phonics (letters and the sounds they make). The proportion of pupils who reached the expected standard in the Year 1 national phonics check was above average in 2013. Although pupils do well in reading, their progress is not as strong as in writing and mathematics.  Since its last inspection, the school has focused on improving pupils’ writing skills. Pupils have

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

opportunities to write in a range of styles in different subjects and better teaching has raised attainment and improved progress.  Pupils’ basic skills in mathematics are secure and they apply and use these skills effectively. As a result they make good progress in mathematics across the school.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress. Their needs are accurately identified and they receive effective support either individually in lessons or in small groups. As a result their achievement matches that of other pupils.  Pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium make the same good progress as other pupils. Test results at the end of 2012 showed that the attainment of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals was approximately two terms behind that of other pupils in English and mathematics. However, their achievement strengthened in 2013 and this gap is closing. This

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

shows the school’s successful commitment to equality of opportunity for all pupils.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is typically good across the school. Pupils made good progress in the vast majority of lessons seen during the inspection, and work in pupils’ books confirms that teaching has been good over time.  There are good relationships between teachers and pupils. Teachers know pupils well and have high expectations. They use praise effectively to motivate and engage pupils. As a result pupils have positive attitudes to learning and are keen to do well.  In the best lessons, where pupils make the most rapid progress, work is carefully matched to the needs and abilities of all pupils and there is a good pace and challenge to learning. Teachers ask questions to check pupils’ understanding and to challenge them to deepen their understanding.  For example, in an English lesson, pupils were planning a piece of writing using a historical setting. The teacher ensured that all pupils were challenged via skilful questioning and all groups

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

had clear learning objectives. The pupils were excited by the task and responded very well. As a result they all made at least good progress.  Where teaching is less strong, teachers ask questions that test and reinforce pupils’ knowledge rather than challenging them to deepen their understanding, and work is less well matched to the needs and abilities of all pupils. The most-able pupils in particular are not always given work which is challenging enough to enable them to reach the highest levels and make the best possible progress. In these lessons, the pace of pupils’ learning is slower.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage, there is a good balance of adult-led and child-initiated activities. However, in some activities, there is lack of focus and structure to learning and staff do not share observations and identify the next steps in children’s learning enough. This means that work does not always meet the needs of individual children closely enough and

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

opportunities are missed to extend and promote children’s learning.  Pupils’ books show a good quantity of work covering all subjects. Teachers encourage pupils to take pride in their work and ensure that it is well presented. Teachers mark work well and there is a good balance of praise and suggestions for improvement. As a result pupils know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve.  Teachers and teaching assistants work well together. They use a range of methods to provide extra help and support for pupils who are disabled or who have special educational needs and those who are eligible for pupil premium funding. This includes extra support within classes and individual or small group teaching outside the classroom. This ensures that any gap in achievement between these groups and other pupils is closing.  While there is very good practice within the school, there are too few opportunities for teachers

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

to share this best practice or to observe outstanding teaching in other schools.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils behave well both in lessons and around the school. They enjoy their work and cooperate well with each other and with adults. Pupils work hard and want to do well. Attendance has been improving and is now above average.  Pupils feel safe in school and well cared for. They have a good knowledge of how to keep themselves safe in different situations, including when using the internet. They understand the different forms bullying can take, including name-calling and cyber-bullying. They say that bullying is very rare in school, but that the school sorts it out quickly if it occurs.  School behaviour logs show that instances of poor behaviour are rare and are dealt with effectively. The school can demonstrate improvements for the few pupils who have shown challenging behaviour at times.  Pupils take on responsibility in areas such as the school and eco council or as buddies for younger pupils. This makes a good contribution to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

development.  Almost all parents who completed the Parent View survey thought that their children were safe and well looked after in school, and that behaviour was good. Inspection evidence confirms this.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders and managers, including governors, know how well the school is performing and are committed to making it better still. They have ensured that the key issues identified at the previous inspection have been addressed, and have accurately identified the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. As a result there have been improvements in the quality of teaching and achievement. There is a positive atmosphere throughout the school.  Better tracking systems now check pupils’ progress more regularly and accurately. Any underachievement is tackled by providing extra help if pupils need it, and any gaps in performance between different groups of pupils are closing. This ensures that the school promotes equal opportunities for all pupils effectively.  Information on pupils’ progress is considered when judging teachers’ performance. It is also taken into account when making decisions about any proposed increases to teachers’ pay.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 There are effective systems to check on the quality of teaching. These identify where further support or training are needed. Coaching and mentoring have improved the quality of teaching, especially in writing, and this has led to a rise in pupils’ achievement.  The curriculum is well planned and provides a range of learning opportunities for all pupils. It is enhanced by a range of activities, trips and visits, and there are strong links to the local church. For example, almost all Year 6 pupils were out of school during the inspection on a residential visit to an outdoor activity centre. The curriculum promotes positive behaviour and contributes to pupils’ good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The school is using the new primary school sport funding to improve the quality of physical education in the school by bringing in specialist teachers from the local sports partnership to

p.6

The leadership and management are good

teach lessons, train staff and improve participation in extra-curricular sport.  The school is in the second year of a major expansion in numbers, and there are good plans in place to ensure that this proceeds smoothly and successfully.  The local authority has provided effective support in reviewing the performance of the school and the headteacher, and has contributed to identifying and delivering training for staff and governors.  The governance of the school:  The governance of the school has improved since the last inspection. Governors are now better informed about pupils’ achievement and the quality and leadership of teaching and learning and have a good overview of performance data. They understand how well the school is working and where it needs to improve. They hold the school to account more effectively now by asking challenging questions and by setting ambitious performance targets for the

p.6

The leadership and management are good

headteacher. They ensure that information about pupils’ progress is taken into account when making decisions about teachers’ pay. They know how the pupil premium funding is spent and the impact it is having on raising achievement. They ensure that the finances are well managed and that the school meets its statutory duties, including those related to safeguarding.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 105821 Local authority Rochdale Inspection number 426095

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 263 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Nick Feist Headteacher Jacqui Potts Date of previous school inspection 23 November 2011 Telephone number 0161 6430753 Fax number 0161 6430753 Email address office@middletonparishce.rochdale.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion