Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen McShane

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen McShane

  • Postcode verified

    ST5 6BX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongcaringeffectiveenjoyconsistently
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings585w+55
  • What needs to improve96w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
670
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk 15 October 2013

p.1

Mr M Fenton Headteacher Cedars - Newcastle, Moorlands and Darwin Bases High Street Knutton Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire ST5 6BX

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 23 and 24 September 2013 to look at the pupil referral unit’s use of alternative provision. During my visit I met with you, your senior mentor and other members of staff. I observed the weekly meeting that you hold to discuss individual students. I examined a range of documentation. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Martec Training, E.Quality Training Limited and Unity School.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 The majority of Key Stage 4 students who are registered at Cedars are placed at an alternative provider full time or part time to study for vocational qualifications. Cedars offers additional sessions so students can study for GCSEs, particularly in English, mathematics and art. The pupil referral unit also provides a base for students to attend meetings and receive support from outside agencies, as appropriate.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 Before they join the pupil referral unit, students frequently have had negative or disrupted educational experiences and their previous attendance has been sporadic. Attendance by students when placed at an alternative provider by Cedars increases significantly.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 Mentoring staff quickly establish very good relationships with students and keep in very close contact. They are very responsive to students’ needs and so issues are very quickly resolved. A weekly meeting of all mentoring staff and the bursar of the pupil referral unit means that attendance and engagement are very closely monitored and rapid action is taken if necessary. This flexible and caring support from adults is a key factor in students’ success.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 The allocation of a mentor to each of the providers means that a named member of Cedars’ staff develops a close working relationship with the provider as well as the students who attend that provider. This ensures that there is an effective partnership in supporting the student to succeed.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 As there is good knowledge of the providers and close working with students there is a good match of students to suitable courses and therefore a strong likelihood of success. Students study a wide range of relevant vocational qualifications. They improve their English and mathematics so that they achieve GCSEs or functional skills qualifications. The large majority of students go on to further study.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 The pupil referral unit works with a small number of Ofsted-registered alternative providers. This means that leaders and managers can be assured that quality is checked by an external body and standards monitored in safeguarding and health and safety.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 A comprehensive service level agreement is in place with each provider detailing respective responsibilities. The head of centre carries out regular quality assurance visits to monitor the service level agreement and keep in touch.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the pupil referral’s work

 Students spoken to say that they enjoy their placements. They describe a future for them that builds on their current learning. Students consistently feel that the staff from Cedars or the provider will support them and resolve any issues they encounter.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the senior management team of Cedars are systematically checking that students are making good or better progress on their courses and are on a trajectory towards attending full time relevant and appropriate education as quickly as possible  ensuring that the centre’s records of pupil and provider contact reflects the work carried out and is systematically completed to ensure that there are no omissions in procedures or information sharing

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the senior leaders, including the management committee, collate available information frequently and regularly evaluate students’ achievement and the effectiveness of providers.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion