Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Morgan-Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Morgan-Price

  • Postcode verified

    UB4 9LE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseextremelyhigh qualityenjoysuccessfulwell supportedclear
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings297w+71
  • What needs to improve117w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
406
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr R Lobatto Headteacher Barnhill Community High School Yeading Lane Hayes UB4 9LE

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 16 and 17 September 2013 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with the assistant headteacher who co-ordinates the alternative provision, the deputy headteacher and with groups of Year 10 and 11 students. I examined a range of documents including achievement and destination data. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Northwood School and Skidz Hillingdon.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The vast majority of students enjoy their placement and like the opportunities that the placement provides in developing their vocational skills.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students receive an extremely broad and well-balanced curriculum. All students who attend vocational courses were successful in securing their option subjects. Programmes of study are personalised to students’ needs and interests.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 There are good opportunities for students to achieve appropriate qualifications in English and mathematics. There are well-thought through strategies to ensure students can catch up on lessons they miss these subjects. Most students achieve a relevant qualification in English and mathematics.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Alternative provision providers feel well supported by the school and say they have clear lines of communication if they have issues or concerns. The accommodation seen during the inspection is of a high quality.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all reports about students from providers are regular and include relevant useful information on students’ progress in all areas of their chosen course, including achievement in key or employability skills. In addition to this, the school should provide detailed information of students’ attainment and specific needs to the providers

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 monitoring the quality of the provision of all providers including their health and safety procedures. In addition to this, fully assess the impact of all alternative provision by establishing an appropriate way to measure its success

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensure that the Governing Body is aware of each provider’s effectiveness

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 providing a clear and appropriate progression pathway for Year 11 students undertaking the hairdressing placement.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion