Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Matthew's CofE Primary School

Inspected 3 Oct 2013 · published 23 Oct 2013 · URN 105709

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Mark Randall (lead), Christine Millett, Peter McKay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Millett, Mark Randall, Peter McKay

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Postcode verified

    OL9 9BN

  • Name on report verified

    St Matthew's CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    105709

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesuccessfullygood progressstrengthsvery welloutstandingconsistentlyfeel safemake good progress
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinadequatenot yetrequires improvementnot make good progressserioustoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings415w+90
  • What needs to improve2100w+19

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,430
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 13%What needs to improve 64%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

St Matthew's CofE Primary School Chadderton Hall Road , Chadderton, Oldham, Lancashire, OL9 9BN

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 By the time they leave in Year 6, not enough pupils have made good or better progress between Years 3 and 6, especially in reading, and mathematics for them to achieve higher standards.  There is not enough good or better teaching to ensure that pupils make consistently good progress in all classes.  Teachers do not always give pupils work that will get the best out of them and some teachers in Years 3 to 6 do not have high enough expectations of what more-able pupils can do.  In some classes, pupils do not have enough time in the lesson to work by themselves and practise their skills.  Marking does not always provide clear guidance to pupils on how to improve their work.  Not all leaders check the quality of teaching rigorously enough in order to bring about improvements and some subject leaders do not have the necessary skills to do this.  Not enough use is made of the school’s information on pupils’ progress to set

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Pupils behave well in lessons and around school. They are courteous and polite to adults and to each other. The school provides a caring environment and pupils feel safe and parents agree that their children feel safe.  Teaching assistants are used well to support and challenge pupils’ learning in lessons.  School leaders and governors have taken good action to improve the school. Pupils’ progress is beginning to speed up in Years 3 to 6, especially in writing.  Children get off to a good start in the Reception classes. They continue to make good progress in Years 1 and 2 because of good teaching.  The headteacher, supported by governors, has successfully led the amalgamation of St. Matthew’s with a nearby school, despite significant staffing difficulties. She has secured the determination of all staff to drive through the needed improvements to raise standards.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 19 lessons, including a joint lesson observation with the headteacher and two joint observations with the deputy headteacher.  Discussions were held with pupils from Year 4 and Year 6, the headteacher and deputy headteacher, members of the governing body, two representatives from the local authority and English and mathematics subject leaders.  Inspectors listened to Year 1 and Year 6 pupils read.  The inspectors took account of 62 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) as well as having informal discussions with parents at the start of the day.  The inspectors observed the school’s work and analysed a range of documents and policies, including the school’s view of its own performance, school improvement priorities, information about pupils’ progress, attendance records, safeguarding documents, performance management documents and a sample of pupils’ work.

p.2

Inspection team

Mark Randall, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Christine Millett Additional Inspector Peter McKay Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 St Matthew’s is a larger than average-sized primary school, which has increased in size by 240 pupils since the previous inspection. In September 2012, the local authority amalgamated the nearby Chadderton Hall Junior School and St. Matthew’s CofE Infant School through the closure of Chadderton Hall and the expansion of St. Matthew’s. The school is on two sites.  Almost all pupils are of White British heritage.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported by school action is below average.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported by school action plus or a statement is below average.  The proportion of pupils eligible for pupil premium is below average. The pupil premium provides additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, in local authority care and those with a parent in the armed services.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or better in order for all pupils to make at least good progress and hence raise standards in Years 3 to 6, particularly in reading and mathematics, by:  providing pupils with work that is at the right level and building on pupils’ previous learning  ensuring that lessons are well planned so that pupils have enough time to demonstrate their learning and practise their skills, especially in reading and mathematics  raising teachers’ expectations of what the most-able pupils can achieve in all subjects but especially in reading  ensuring that the quality of written feedback telling pupils how to improve their work matches the good quality of oral feedback pupils are given in lessons.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of leadership and management at all levels to improve pupils’ achievement by:  establishing more rigorous procedures to check the quality of teaching and how well teaching is helping pupils and groups of pupils to learn  making more effective use of information about pupils’ progress to bring about improvement by setting challenging targets for individuals and groups  developing the roles and skills of subject leaders so that they can gain an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in their areas of responsibility and contribute fully to school improvement.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement is not good because not enough pupils make good progress in reading and mathematics from Year 3 to Year 6. Consequently in 2013, standards at the end of Year 6 in English and mathematics were broadly average, which is not high enough considering their starting points in Year 3.  Progress in Years 3 to 6 has not been rapid enough over time. However, evidence from lesson observations, work in pupils’ books and the school’s own information on pupils’ progress show that, following amalgamation, progress is beginning to improve because leaders are providing stability and supporting teachers in improving their practice.  Standards in reading are lower than in writing. Older pupils read avidly with fluency and expression; however they are not given sufficient time to apply their skills of inference and deduction by reading extended and more challenging texts.  The rate of pupils’ progress in mathematics is good in some classes but slows in others when

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

they are not given work that helps them to do their best. They do not have enough opportunities to use their number skills to help them to solve problems independently.  The most-able pupils are not always challenged to think for themselves and apply the skills they are learning soon enough. Consequently, not enough pupils attain the higher levels by the end of Year 6, especially in reading, and too few make better than expected progress.  Since the amalgamation of the two schools, leaders have successfully concentrated their efforts on improving older pupils’ writing, and this has accelerated the rate of their progress. This resulted in higher standards in writing than reading and mathematics in the national tests at the end of Year 6 in 2013.  In 2013, the pupils in Year 6 who were entitled to additional support through pupil premium funding made less progress than that of other pupils in writing and mathematics. These pupils

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

were a term behind their classmates in reading and over a year behind in writing and mathematics with these gaps being wider than those found nationally. The school has implemented a range of strategies to raise the achievement of these pupils and is now tracking their progress more rigorously. It is too early to see the impact of these strategies.  Current school data shows that disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make similar to, and sometimes better progress, than other pupils overall. This is because of the good quality support they receive from teaching assistants in lessons. This demonstrates the school’s commitment to promoting equal opportunities.  Children enter school with skills and abilities typical for their age. They make good progress by the end of Reception as a result of good teaching, careful assessment and well planned activities both indoors and outdoors. They continue to achieve well in Years 1 and 2 so that standards are

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

above average at the end of the key stage.  Younger pupils read regularly and use their knowledge of letters and sounds (phonics) to read difficult words. In 2013, the proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in the national Year 1 phonics test was higher than the national average.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching is not yet consistently good and is not helping pupils to make good progress through the school. Teaching over time in Years 3 to 6 has not enabled pupils to achieve well.  Teachers do not always provide pupils with work that helps them to do their best. Teachers’ introductions and activities are often pitched too low and too many pupils find the work easy. In a number of lessons observed, pupils were given the same tasks and did not learn well enough, especially the more able. Evidence from pupils’ work also shows that pupils in some classes repeat work they have covered in previous years.  In some classes, lengthy introductions result in pupils not having enough time to practise and develop their skills independently or work things out for themselves. In a Year 5 lesson, pupils of all abilities were required to sit and listen to the teacher explaining the features of written

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

instructions and how to use basic punctuation. Many of these pupils could have started writing sooner; if so, they would have made better progress.  Although teachers mark work regularly, they do not always provide clear enough guidance for pupils to follow to reach the next steps in their learning. Pupils are not given the opportunity to respond to their teachers’ marking and improve their work.  Throughout the school, teachers establish good relationships with their pupils and many provide interesting activities that capture pupils’ imagination so that they work enthusiastically at their tasks.  In the best lessons, teachers move around the classroom and use their good subject knowledge to question and challenge pupils’ thinking. Furthermore, pupils are given time to be able to work things out for themselves. A good example of this was seen in a Year 5 mathematics lesson, when pupils were investigating the number of diagonals found in different shapes. The teacher

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

moved round the classroom asking questions to challenge pupils to identify and describe the types and properties of triangles they could find. Consequently, these pupils made good progress.  Teachers plan well to ensure that teaching assistants are used to good effect. In many classes teaching assistants and other adults support and challenge pupils well, especially disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, through careful questioning and good explanations. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, these pupils were able to divide decimals as a result of the effective support given to them by the teaching assistant.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Older pupils show very positive attitudes to learning. They behave very well in lessons, listen attentively and get on with their work straight away. However, younger pupils can, occasionally, lose concentration and become restless when they have to sit and listen to their teachers for too long before getting on with their work.  Behaviour around school and at playtimes is good. Pupils play happily together with ‘play buddies’ ensuring that all pupils have someone to play with. Pupils are well supervised at these times.  Pupils are extremely polite and courteous both to adults and each other. They work together well in lessons and are keen to help each other to do their best.  Pupils say that they feel safe because they are well cared for by their teachers. They have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying, including cyber-bullying and all agree that the rare incidents of bullying are dealt with very quickly. School records confirm this.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Almost all of the parents who completed the online questionnaire (Parent View) agree that their child feels safe in school and that behaviour is good.  Pupils attend school regularly and attendance is average. Almost all pupils arrive to lessons on time and are eager to learn demonstrating that that they like school and feel happy there.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The leadership and management of the school require improvement because, although leaders check the quality of teaching, it is not with sufficient rigour to bring about consistently good teaching and progress across the school. The checking on the quality of teaching does not focus strongly enough on how well teaching is helping pupils to learn.  Subject leaders’ skills are underdeveloped. Some are new to their roles and do not yet have a clear view of strengths and weaknesses in their areas of responsibility. Consequently, they are not contributing fully to improvements in their subjects.  Leaders gather information about pupils’ progress regularly and are now beginning to analyse it effectively to enable them to gain an accurate view of how much progress different groups of pupils are making. However, they have not yet used this information to set challenging targets for individual pupils or groups to raise achievement.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 However, there is evidence that the actions of school leaders are beginning to have a positive impact in improving teaching and achievement. For instance, in Years 3 to 6, the school’s strong focus on improving writing over the past year has successfully resulted in the quality of pupils’ writing improving, and in Years 1 and 2, pupils’ good achievement has been maintained and improved during the changes caused by amalgamation.  The headteacher has a clear view of how successful the school can be. Following the amalgamation she has been successful in uniting staff from both schools despite some staffing difficulties. She has used the different strengths of each school to best advantage, and set in motion good plans to improve pupils’ achievement starting with writing. Her commitment to further improvement is now shared by all.  Safeguarding procedures, including those related to child protection, are extremely thorough and

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

ensure that all pupils are kept safe.  The curriculum is balanced and exciting and promotes spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. A range of visits are used successfully to make pupils keen to learn, for example, a visit to the theatre to watch ‘The Lion King’ very effectively captured pupils’ interests as they began their work on Africa. Partnerships with local schools provide pupils with opportunities to be involved in a range of sporting activities such as cross country.  The school has made good plans to use the new primary school sport funding to appoint a sports development leader who will work alongside teachers to develop their skills and expertise in teaching physical education. Pupils will therefore be taught a wider range of sports to better promote healthy lifestyles.  The local authority was supportive to the headteacher and governors during the amalgamation.  The governance of the school:

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Governors have successfully managed the amalgamation of the two governing bodies of St. Matthew’s Church of England School and Chadderton Hall School, and have brought two different schools together. Although at an early stage of establishing a strong relationship with all the staff in the new school, they know the school’s strengths and weaknesses well, through detailed reports from the headteacher. They check on how well pupils perform including those for whom the pupil premium provides support. They know about the quality of teaching and how this is linked to teachers’ pay. They decide whether teachers should be rewarded with salary increases and set targets for the headteacher’s performance.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 105709 Local authority Oldham Inspection number 424593

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 422 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Sybil Lamb Headteacher Patricia Shepherd Date of previous school inspection 14 December 2007 Telephone number 0161 624 9829 Fax number 0161 624 9829 Email address info@st-matthews.oldham.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion