Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sandra Hayes
- Postcode verified
B21 9SN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment16
“Teachers have visited other schools to observe good and outstanding practice.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 939
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Terry Green Executive Principal Nishkam Free School 3-11 Soho Road Handsworth B21 9SN
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 7 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
Make the intended outcomes, listed in the action plan, sharper and more measurable so that governors can hold the school more effectively to account for the achievement of different groups of pupils. Check more frequently whether all teachers are following agreed policies. Ensure short timescales are set when giving teachers next steps to help them improve the quality of teaching. Follow these targets up quickly to maintain a rapid rate of improvement.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, two members of the Governing Body and a representative of the Elliot Foundation to discuss the Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Other documents were examined: the school’s checks on the quality of teaching and pupils’ work, samples of teachers’ planning and pupils’ work, the most up-to-date information about pupils’ achievement and records of support from the Elliot Foundation. Short visits were made to lessons to talk with pupils and look at their learning.
p.1
Context
The headteacher left the school at the end of September. The deputy headteacher is currently acting headteacher, overseen by you as Executive Principal for Nishkam Schools. A new deputy headteacher has been appointed and will join the school on a part time basis during October.
p.2
Main findings
You, the senior leaders and the governing body have responded to the issues identified at the section 5 inspection with a clear focus and determination. Governors acted decisively to strengthen the capacity of leadership to drive forward rapid improvement. They wisely plan to evaluate the effectiveness of current leadership arrangements in the short term and are considering suitable options to maintain continuity. Governors are working closely with you and the acting headteacher to build a picture of the school’s effectiveness for themselves. In addition, they appropriately seek external verification of their own evaluation.
p.2
Main findings
Additional teachers and associate teachers have been deployed to provide smaller teaching groups with extra challenge for more able pupils. Leaders report this is helping these pupils make better progress. Teachers have received training in how to meet the needs of all pupils, particularly the more able. Lesson plans show increased focus on these pupils, for example through the use of challenging questions or investigative activities. Pupils’ books indicate some are still not challenged enough in lessons as they spend time repeating work they can already do.
p.2
Main findings
In this inspection, many pupils were seen to be actively involved in their learning. However, time was wasted for a few pupils who sat passively when they had finished their work or were waiting for help. Pupils’ books show that, in some classes, teachers use agreed approaches for marking pupils’ work to give clear guidance for improvement. This is helping pupils make swifter progress. In other classes, the marking process is not used as well as this. Some effective questioning was seen, through which a teacher checked pupils’ understanding in a mathematics lesson. She then quickly moved the pupils on to harder work when they were ready. In another lesson, the teacher did not use questions in this way so missed the opportunity to address some pupils’ misunderstanding or to challenge other pupils further. The school’s improvement plan includes suitable actions to address the issues identified at the section 5 inspection. It shows clear responsibilities and
p.2
Main findings
accountability. Timescales are appropriate to achieve rapid improvement. Overall the plan provides a useful framework to move the school towards the next level. However, the plan would benefit from the addition of more measurable intended outcomes for some actions so that governors can keep a very close check on improvements being made.
p.3
Main findings
Senior leaders, supported by external consultants, check the quality of teaching and the work in pupils’ books. These checks focus on the impact of teaching on pupils’ achievement. Feedback to teachers shows them what they are doing well and where improvements are required. The dates you expect to see these improvements are not always recorded and so it is not clear whether they have been followed up.
p.3
External support
You have drawn effectively upon a range of external support to provide training for teachers in meeting the needs of all pupils and to improve the work of subject leaders. Teachers have visited other schools to observe good and outstanding practice. You have actively sought to include primary educational expertise on the governing body. Governors are seeking to develop effective ways to judge the impact of external support and thus ensure it provides value for money.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for insert local authority name and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion