Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kevin Sheldrick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kevin Sheldrick

  • Postcode verified

    CV8 1BA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedconfidentlyimprovingclear
Criticismnot good progressnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings521w+30
  • What needs to improve335w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
854
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 39%

Full report text

Mrs Margot Brown Headteacher Priors Field School Clinton Lane Kenilworth CV8 1BA

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priors Field School

Following my visit to your school on 9 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priors Field School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priors Field School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priors Field School

 particularly in mathematics lessons, increase the opportunities pupils have to make choices so they can concentrate more on work they find challenging  ensure the headteacher’s performance management targets fully reflect the overall improved outcomes identified in the school’s rapid improvement plan  develop partnerships so staff can learn from the good practice beyond the school and to increase opportunities for collaborative planning. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799156 Direct email : becky.dawson@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, your assistant head teachers, your mathematics leader, two members of the Governing Body, including the Chair, and a representative of the local authority. I evaluated the school improvement plan and scrutinised a range of documents, including minutes of the governing body meetings, information about the progress pupils are making, the school’s evaluations of teaching. I also made short visits to 7 lessons.

p.2

Context

Your Chair of Governors resigned at the end of last term and is no longer a governor. A new Chair was elected early this term. Two new teachers have joined the school following the departure of one teacher and to cover maternity leave.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s provisional results in the 2013 National tests and assessments point to some improvement this year but pupils are not yet making good progress. A new marking and feedback policy has been implemented. This emphasises the importance of identifying the next steps in learning and that pupils should respond to teachers’ comments. The school’s monitoring, undertaken since the inspection in June, correctly indicates that there is some variability in how effectively the marking and feedback policy is being implemented.

p.2

Main findings

You have introduced a number of new initiatives aimed at improving teaching and enhancing the progress made by pupils. These include a greater variety of approaches to questioning and strategies aimed at reducing the amount of teacher talk in lessons so pupils can devote more time to work that is matched to their needs. The school has developed a training programme in recognition that staff need further support to implement these new ideas. Teachers are using better starter activities that engage pupils at the beginning of lessons. Learning is being more regularly reviewed so teachers can check on pupils’ learning. The school has recognised that these reviews could be further enhanced if there is a stronger focus on using pupils’ emerging work to highlight key learning points. Middle ability pupils are being challenged more; for instance, they can undertake the work designed for the most able, although at times they are not able to move onto this quickly enough.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are not able to make sufficient choices in their learning; for instance omitting questions in mathematics that they do not find sufficiently challenging.

p.2

Main findings

Your ‘rapid improvement plan’ covers all the issues identified and contains admirably challenging targets, including some that can be used to check progress on a termly basis. Plans have been developed that will allow staff to observe effective teachers in the school. However there is a need to further develop partnerships so teachers can learn from the good practice that exists in other schools. In addition, teachers are not benefitting from the opportunity to plan collaboratively with teachers of the same year group. Your governing body has acted quickly in commissioning an external review of its work. The review’s recommendations are being implemented so that governors are much better placed to effectively hold senior leaders to account. The new Chair of Governors is very clear about the key information that governors require. Governors recognise that the performance management of the headteacher in the past has not focussed on the most important indicators and are

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing appropriate support to the school; for instance its review of the governing body has identified the main priorities that will improve governance of the school. Regular local authority reviews of teaching are planned to check that staff can confidently demonstrate the new skills they are developing. These reviews will also provide the governing body with an external source of evidence about the progress being made.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Solihull. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion