Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lee Northern
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, in order to accelerate the pace of improvement, school leaders, governors and the local authority should: p.2
- Based on these criteria, the plan should also state appropriate milestones so that school leaders and governors can check that the school is on track to meet these expectations p.2
- School leaders and governors should ensure that p.2
- Further consideration should be given to devising ways in which students can be rewarded for improved attendance as well as for meeting certain p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 774
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Mr Derek Cogle Headteacher Atkinson House School North Terrace Seghill Cramlington Northumberland NE23 7EB
p.1
Seghill, Northumberland
Following my visit to your school on 27 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Seghill, Northumberland
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and with other senior leaders. In addition, HMI met with the subject leaders for literacy and numeracy, and with the attendance support officer. HMI also met with the school’s improvement partner and with a representative from the local authority. Four new governors also attended the school to meet with HMI, who also looked at documentation including the school’s updated action plan. HMI also observed parts of two lessons in Key Stage 3, as well as a meeting of the student support group.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes to staff or the school’s organisation since the previous monitoring inspection. Four new governors have been appointed to the governing body and one existing governor has stepped down. A new local authority school improvement officer has been appointed to support the school.
p.1
Main findings
At the conclusion of the monitoring inspection, HMI shared the main findings of the visit with the headteacher. HMI noted that progress had been made by the school in bringing about improvement in the following aspects of its work:
p.1
Main findings
Following the appointment of four new governors, the governing body now has greater confidence and experience in carrying out its role to support and challenge the school the revised school improvement plan now states more clearly the priorities for improvement, identifies which staff are responsible for different aspects of the plan and indicates how governors will check the progress made. Most timescales and monitoring strategies are now more clearly defined the revised curriculum is now more fully inclusive of all students the work of the student support group is highly effective in ensuring the views of students are heard and valued steps have been taken to strengthen the school’s approaches to improving attendance, including through rewards and a focus on improving the attendance of all groups of students. Further consideration should be given to devising ways in which students can be rewarded for improved attendance as well as for meeting certain
p.2
Main findings
However, in order to accelerate the pace of improvement, school leaders, governors and the local authority should:
p.2
Main findings
Sharpen the school improvement plan further by linking to each aspect measurable criteria by which the school will be judged ‘good’ at its next full inspection. Based on these criteria, the plan should also state appropriate milestones so that school leaders and governors can check that the school is on track to meet these expectations clarify the role of leaders, governors and the local authority in monitoring the pace and extent of improvements at the school, stating these clearly in the school improvement plan and regularly evaluating the progress made pursue with greater urgency and focus the links with Park View School, indicating clearly where these links will support actions identified in the school improvement plan place a greater emphasis on securing rapid improvements to teaching and learning, including through establishing a series of ‘non-negotiable’ features of ‘good’ teaching based on the Teachers’ Standards. School leaders and governors should ensure that
p.2
Main findings
teachers’ performance management targets and leaders’ checks on teaching reflect closely these agreed features further develop the use of assessment information so that: o all teachers can use this information to plan lessons that closely meet the needs of every student o the school can demonstrate clearly the progress that students make o leaders can identify any underachievement and take prompt action in response o leaders and governors can measure the impact of actions taken.
p.2
Main findings
HMI will visit the school again in the spring term 2014 in order to evaluate the impact of the actions taken by school leaders, governors and the local authority following this visit. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Northumberland.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion