Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Gill Jones
- Postcode verified
AL3 5JB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“Expectations for children’s achievement are too low.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 738
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Mireille MacRaild Acting Headteacher Muriel Green Nursery School Church Crescent St Albans AL3 5JB
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Muriel Green Nursery School
Following my visit to your school on 2 October 2013 with Chris Moodie HMI, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions, which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Muriel Green Nursery School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection, which took place in July 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, we held meetings with you, staff and a representative of the local authority. We evaluated the local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan. Governors were not available because this was a no-notice inspection to check on the safeguarding concerns raised at the section 5 inspection. A meeting with governors will take place later this term.
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection, the headteacher and the Chair of the Governing Body have left the school. A new substantive headteacher will start in January 2014. The local authority seconded you from its Early Years Improvement Service to take over as the acting headteacher on 1 September, following the immediate placement of a local authority officer for the day care provision. Two newly qualified teachers appointed prior to the section 5 inspection started in September. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority responded rapidly to the findings of Ofsted’s section 5 inspection, recognising and accepting all the issues outlined in the report. It dealt with the immediate leadership issues swiftly. Seconding you as acting headteacher to lead the school and the private day-care nursery is leading to significant improvements in both settings. This was a well-conceived strategy. You are providing very strong leadership.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The section 5 inspection uncovered a number of safeguarding weaknesses in the school. It found that the administration of medicines, risk assessments, the single central record, safe recruitment of staff and fire safety were all weak. Improving these aspects has been your priority. During the inspection, inspectors checked whether staff understood the new policies and procedures for safeguarding children’s wellbeing. Staff told inspectors that they were implementing the new policies. They provided evidence of where they had taken effective action to remedy weaknesses; for example, in the administration of medicines. Inspectors found that safeguarding now meets statutory requirements.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
You accompanied me around the nursery to look at the quality of teaching and assessment of children’s learning needs. Our discussions with senior staff indicate that they are struggling to meet some elements of the nationally agreed Teachers’ Standards, despite being on the upper pay scale for teachers. Staff are now implementing a key worker system to support children’s individual learning needs, but senior staff lack clarity about the purpose of this. Consequently, assessments and record keeping are unsystematic. Expectations for children’s achievement are too low. Senior staff are unfamiliar with holding staff to account for children’s achievement, so are having little impact on improving the quality of teaching. You are implementing performance management arrangements, as set out in the school improvement plan and local authority action plan, but the targets in teachers’ individual plans need to be tight, with small steps for improvement that are easily
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
measurable and achievable within short time frames.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority statement of action deals with all the areas for improvement from the section 5 inspection. It identifies realistic timescales and appropriate actions for improvement. You have successfully achieved one aspect of the plan, to address safeguarding concerns. The more complex plan around accountability and governance requires some additional detail in the success criteria. An external review of the governing body is due to happen in the very near future. The local authority has committed to act upon the findings of this review. I will check the impact of this review on my next visit to the school. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire and as below. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion