Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gill Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gill Jones

  • Postcode verified

    AL3 5JB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−47Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongimprovingeffectivesuccessfullyswiftlysafe
Criticismweaknessesconcernsweaklacktoo lowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings247w−43
  • Leadership491w−41

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
738
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 32%Leadership 64%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Ms Mireille MacRaild Acting Headteacher Muriel Green Nursery School Church Crescent St Albans AL3 5JB

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Muriel Green Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 2 October 2013 with Chris Moodie HMI, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions, which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Muriel Green Nursery School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection, which took place in July 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, we held meetings with you, staff and a representative of the local authority. We evaluated the local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan. Governors were not available because this was a no-notice inspection to check on the safeguarding concerns raised at the section 5 inspection. A meeting with governors will take place later this term.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection, the headteacher and the Chair of the Governing Body have left the school. A new substantive headteacher will start in January 2014. The local authority seconded you from its Early Years Improvement Service to take over as the acting headteacher on 1 September, following the immediate placement of a local authority officer for the day care provision. Two newly qualified teachers appointed prior to the section 5 inspection started in September. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority responded rapidly to the findings of Ofsted’s section 5 inspection, recognising and accepting all the issues outlined in the report. It dealt with the immediate leadership issues swiftly. Seconding you as acting headteacher to lead the school and the private day-care nursery is leading to significant improvements in both settings. This was a well-conceived strategy. You are providing very strong leadership.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The section 5 inspection uncovered a number of safeguarding weaknesses in the school. It found that the administration of medicines, risk assessments, the single central record, safe recruitment of staff and fire safety were all weak. Improving these aspects has been your priority. During the inspection, inspectors checked whether staff understood the new policies and procedures for safeguarding children’s wellbeing. Staff told inspectors that they were implementing the new policies. They provided evidence of where they had taken effective action to remedy weaknesses; for example, in the administration of medicines. Inspectors found that safeguarding now meets statutory requirements.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You accompanied me around the nursery to look at the quality of teaching and assessment of children’s learning needs. Our discussions with senior staff indicate that they are struggling to meet some elements of the nationally agreed Teachers’ Standards, despite being on the upper pay scale for teachers. Staff are now implementing a key worker system to support children’s individual learning needs, but senior staff lack clarity about the purpose of this. Consequently, assessments and record keeping are unsystematic. Expectations for children’s achievement are too low. Senior staff are unfamiliar with holding staff to account for children’s achievement, so are having little impact on improving the quality of teaching. You are implementing performance management arrangements, as set out in the school improvement plan and local authority action plan, but the targets in teachers’ individual plans need to be tight, with small steps for improvement that are easily

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

measurable and achievable within short time frames.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action deals with all the areas for improvement from the section 5 inspection. It identifies realistic timescales and appropriate actions for improvement. You have successfully achieved one aspect of the plan, to address safeguarding concerns. The more complex plan around accountability and governance requires some additional detail in the success criteria. An external review of the governing body is due to happen in the very near future. The local authority has committed to act upon the findings of this review. I will check the impact of this review on my next visit to the school. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire and as below. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion