Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Katrina Gueli

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Katrina Gueli

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivesecurepositivelyeffectivelysuccessfullypositiveimproving
Criticismgapslackconcernsabsencebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
967
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566868 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: pnuttie@cfbt.com

p.1

Ms Devane Headteacher Shire Oak CE (VC) Primary School Wood Lane Headingley Leeds West Yorkshire LS6 2DT

p.1

School, Leeds

Following my visit to your school on 27 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Leeds

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Leeds

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Leeds

 agree measurable milestones to enable the school’s progress towards ‘good’ to be monitored robustly  review whole-school targets to ensure they provide the degree of challenge needed to secure good achievement  ensure the evaluation of pupils’ progress takes account of the proportions meeting and exceeding expectations relative to their starting points.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, a group of staff and the Chair of the Governing Body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority and had a tour of the school with two Year 6 pupils. The school development plan was evaluated and other documents were scrutinised, for example, the outcomes of recent monitoring activities and data relating to pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.1

Context

In September, a new deputy headteacher joined the school along with a part-time teacher who has been appointed to focus specifically on improving pupils’ attitudes to learning and behaviour.

p.2

Main findings

Governors, staff, other leaders and you were disappointed with the inspection outcome. Nevertheless, all those involved with the school have responded positively and show a strong commitment to securing rapid improvement. The appointment of a deputy headteacher after a period with no-one in this role has increased the capacity of your senior team to tackle areas for development quickly. The school development plan incorporates the improvement areas identified at the recent inspection and you and your leadership team were already fully aware that these were key priorities for the school. Some targets in the plan lack precision and in other cases do not provide sufficient challenge, particularly for the proportion of pupils who will reach the highest levels by the end of Key Stage 2. The absence of measurable milestones makes it more difficult to assess in the short term whether the school is on course to secure the improvement needed to be judged ‘good’. The

p.2

Main findings

school is closely monitoring the progress of different groups and checks carefully whether pupils are on track to make the progress expected. Data summaries to support the school’s evaluation of pupils’ achievement incorporate too little information about the proportion of pupils making better than expected progress relative to their starting points.

p.2

Main findings

Action to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement in mathematics has continued apace. Staff value the opportunities they have to plan together, carry out peer observations and then reflect jointly on their teaching and confirm this is helping to improve their practice. Whole staff training has been well received and is increasing the consistency of the teaching of calculation across the school. New assessment materials and the analysis of pupils’ responses to tests are allowing staff to identify gaps in pupils’ understanding and skills more accurately. This information is being used more effectively to inform whole class teaching and small group or one-to-one interventions so gaps are being successfully addressed. Monitoring of the impact of work to improve mathematics is thorough and frequent. The swift feedback to staff ensures they are very aware of the improvements secured and where more development is needed.

p.2

Main findings

Your consultative approach to exploring the views and concerns of all staff about pupils’ behaviour has been greatly appreciated. The subsequent collaborative development of the behaviour policy has, as one member of staff described, ensured ‘everyone is on the same page’. The ‘respect’ week has actively promoted positive behaviour and this, combined with more consistent behaviour management by staff has already brought about improvements in pupils’ attitudes and behaviour. Further targeted work has begun with a specific class and some individuals but it is too soon for its impact to be seen.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You have found the local authority support valuable and well matched to the school’s priorities. Your staff are making good use of opportunities to work collaboratively with other local schools to share good practice and improve their teaching.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Leeds the Diocese of Leeds and as below.

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority - including where the school is an academy  Contractor providing support services on behalf of the local authority - where appropriate  The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form  < Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  DfE - Academies Advisers Unit [ colin.diamond@education.gsi.gov.uk] - for academies

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion