Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedoutstandingeffectiveconsistentlypositiveimprovingsupportiveclear
Criticismlacknot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
905
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Satadru Ashton Headteacher Byron Wood Primary School Earldom Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S4 7EJ

p.1

School, Sheffield

Following my visit to your school on 27 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Sheffield

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Sheffield

Senior leaders are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Sheffield

 develop the improvement plan so that it contains clear success criteria and milestones which can be monitored and evaluated by senior leaders and governors

p.1

School, Sheffield

 devise a process by which governors can monitor the impact of the actions taken by senior leaders to address the areas for improvement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plans and other documents provided by the school were evaluated. The headteacher took HMI on a tour of the school.

p.1

Context

There are eight new members of staff, seven of whom are teachers and one a higher level teaching assistant. Four of the teachers are employed on one year contracts. The leadership team has been restructured. There are now two permanent and two temporary assistant headteachers. A new layer of higher level teaching assistants has been included in the staffing structure to support the rapid integration of new arrivals into the school.

p.2

Main findings

There is an improvement plan underpinned by plans for each subject area and phase of the school. The plans address the areas for improvement appropriately but lack numerical success criteria and milestones. These need to be included so that the impact of actions taken can be monitored. Details of the way in which support programmes are provided to develop teachers also need to be added.

p.2

Main findings

There is a focus on improved lesson planning with weekly monitoring of teachers’ plans by senior leaders. Marking and feedback are being developed so that the school’s policy is used consistently. Monitoring of marking shows that there is an improvement this term. Teachers report that the improved feedback is motivating pupils.

p.2

Main findings

A new reading scheme, linked to rewards, devised by the school is having a positive impact. Pupils are excited about reading the new books and keen to share their reading with adults. A re-launch of the ‘big write’, which ensures that pupils write independently, and training in sentence structure and grammar for teachers and teaching assistants are improving writing.

p.2

Main findings

There are plans to address underachievement at Key Stage 2. Additional teachers in Year 5 and Year 6 provide targeted interventions for those who are not meeting their targets and for high attainers. Key groups in Year 6 are having extra literacy and mathematics sessions before and after school. Pupils attend these sessions enthusiastically.

p.2

Main findings

The capacity of the leadership has been significantly increased by providing considerable time for the assistant headteachers to undertake monitoring, support and challenge. Monitoring and evaluation is better. There is a calendar which includes regular opportunities for checking teachers’ planning and marking, and lesson observations. Assessment processes are improving as a result of training for staff in the use of the Sheffield pupil progress tracker, half termly data collection and progress meetings with teachers. Teachers whose practice is not yet good have personalised support plans and there are a range of professional development opportunities.

p.2

Main findings

Governors who met HMI are frequent and supportive visitors to the school, working alongside pupils in the classroom. They recognise the impact of improvements in marking and feedback. A review of governance is planned and two new governors need to be recruited who are able to commit time to supporting and challenging school. Governors should consider an appropriate way of monitoring the impact of the actions taken to improve the school.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. HMI plans to return to the school in December to monitor the consistency and impact of improvement

p.2

External support

The Headteacher has brokered the support of a local outstanding school to help develop teaching and learning. An education consultancy is providing support for the leadership team, including a review of teaching and learning in the spring term 2014.

p.3

External support

The local authority is starting to develop a partnership with the school. They will carry out a teaching and learning review in November 2013 and hold regular monitoring and progress meetings with schools judged to require improvement. The local authority representative agreed to support the school in finding additional governors who can add to the capacity to support and challenge the school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Sheffield.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion