Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Pittville School

Inspected 25 Sept 2013 · published 16 Oct 2013 · URN 115772

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

John Carnaghan (lead), Justine Hocking, Steven Colledge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    John Carnaghan, Justine Hocking, Steven Colledge

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    GL52 3JD

  • Name on report verified

    Pittville School

  • URN verified

    115772

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingstrongconfidenthighly effectiveexceptionallyimprovedsuccessfully
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementconcernsinadequatenot yettoo manyinconsistenciesnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings351w+63
  • What needs to improve2007w−16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,286
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%What needs to improve 67%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Pittville School Albert Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL52 3JD

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not yet good because

 Students’ attainment is similar to the national average. English and mathematics attainment remains a little below average. Progress has started to accelerate in the last year and in mathematics it was above average in 2013. However, recent improvements have not yet raised achievement above average levels.  The gap between the progress of students receiving additional government funding as the pupil premium and others is similar to the national average and closed a little in 2013.  Leaders and managers are making numerous reforms to improve the school but these are not yet fully apparent in improved achievement. Plans for the future are convincing but need to be more tightly focused.  The governing body has developed a firm grasp of the school. However, members do not check up on whether the spending of additional pupil premium funds provides good value for money.  There have been improvements in teaching but

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not yet good because

it is still too inconsistent. There is good practice but, in too many lessons, students are not sufficiently challenged and teachers do not provide them with enough opportunities to work independently.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The headteacher, with the strong support of senior managers and governors, has instituted wide-reaching changes that have set higher expectations and have started to improve the school, raising achievement and improving teaching.  Students enjoy school and have an appetite for learning. They are receptive to their teachers, get along well with one another and behave well. Bullying is very unusual and quickly nipped in the bud on the rare occasions when it happens.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited 25 lessons taught by 23 teachers and undertook five joint observations with senior staff.  Inspectors held discussions with students, teachers, the headteacher, senior managers, representatives of the governing body and a local authority officer.  Inspectors examined numerous school documents, including policies, assessment information, planning documents and records of all kinds.  The views of 25 parents were analysed through the Parent View website.

p.2

Inspection team

John Carnaghan, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Justine Hocking Additional Inspector Steven Colledge Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a smaller than average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding for looked-after children, students known to be eligible for free school meals and those from service families) is above the national average.  The proportion of students from minority ethnic groups and those whose first language is not English is below average.  The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is slightly above average. The proportion of students supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average.  The school has a higher than usual turnover of students.  The school does not use any alternative provision for its students (lessons that take place regularly away from school).  The school meets the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement to good by ensuring a higher proportion of teaching is good or better, through:  planning lessons to take full account of assessment information, so they offer the correct degree of challenge and support to all groups of students  providing more opportunities for students to work independently rather than listening passively to their teachers  improving the questioning of students to provide them with greater opportunities for reflection and discussion.  Build on the school’s various initiatives to continue the improvements in students’ attendance.  Develop plans for the future so that they provide simpler, measurable goals that are tightly focused on key priorities.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Students’ attainment at the end of Year 11 is broadly similar to the national average when measured across all subjects; it is a little below average in English and mathematics. There is a generally improving picture with steadily rising attainment over the last three years. The school has successfully tackled previously low attainment in science, French and religious education.  The rate of students’ progress is rising but still requires improvement. Progress in English last year rose but the proportions achieving expected progress and exceeding it remained broadly similar to national averages. In mathematics, the rise was more dramatic and progress in both aspects was good. Last year, the school focused particularly on ensuring the most able students were suitably challenged and, in consequence, the proportion of students gaining the higher A* and A grades rose considerably.  Students who are disabled and those who have special educational needs benefit from effective

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

support; the school uses its plentiful assessment information to identify these students and adjust what they are offered. Additional help in small groups or on an individual basis is usually effective. In this way, the needs of this group are met and they make similar progress to their peers. The school provides equality of opportunity and ensures there is no discrimination.  The group of students involved in the Year 7 catch-up programme benefits from extra help in numeracy and, particularly, literacy. This intensive programme results in a burst of rapid progress for the majority of the targeted students, enabling them to participate fully in their Key Stage 3 studies. Students involved in early entry to the mathematics GCSE examination largely achieve well and have good opportunities to broaden their understanding of mathematics in Year 11 by pursuing relevant additional qualifications.  There remains a gap in attainment between students supported by additional pupil premium

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

funding and others. In English, at the end of Year 11, students are a year behind their peers; in mathematics, a little more than this. However, over the last three years, an increasing number of these students are making and exceeding expected progress and the achievement gap between them and their peers in both English and mathematics is closing. Similar improvements are evident in other year groups because expenditure has been well targeted to meet these students’ specific needs.  Progress in lessons has some inconsistencies but most lessons promote good learning. For example, a well-organised, briskly delivered and interesting Year 10 geography lesson saw students working very hard to meet their learning objectives; they were particularly well motivated because the teacher had made clear their potential GCSE levels and how to achieve them and all groups made good progress.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Students do not make fast enough progress largely because there are inconsistencies in teaching and too many lessons do not urgently drive learning forwards. However, the proportion of good teaching is rising because the school makes regular checks on lessons and acts on concerns, promoting best practice.  Teachers usually plan lessons in a standard format. This ensures a reasonable conformity of practice but does not always offer students the correct degree of challenge. In most classes, two levels of challenge are the norm. Students opt for the work they believe suits them best and teachers try to keep an eye on them to ensure they are working at the correct level.  In practice, students do not always choose the most suitable level to work at, so tend to be inadequately challenged in too many lessons. Two levels of choice are often insufficient when classes have students with a wide range of aptitudes. All too often students’ work fails to keep

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

them working at full stretch.  The conformity of lesson planning means that there are only limited opportunities for students to work independently. In some instances, teachers talk for too long and in many lessons there are few chances for students to work in groups, to undertake investigations or to discuss matters in pairs. While teachers’ initial inputs are often brisk and purposeful, the tasks they set for students tend to lack tight deadlines so the pace of learning often diminishes in the second half of lessons.  Teachers question students throughout lessons to check their understanding. However, their questioning is often too simple, encouraging only the briefest of answers. Because of this, there are not enough opportunities for students to think creatively about their work or reflect in depth about the topic under consideration.  Teachers mark work regularly and well. They offer analytical and helpful comments and students

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

say they appreciate knowing the level of their work and how to improve it. Teachers display good subject knowledge, especially in coaching students how to reach the highest grades in their examinations.  Classrooms are notable for a calm atmosphere and good behaviour. Students are polite, hard- working and are usually good listeners. Teachers foster good relationships and students appreciate the concern they show for their progress. Teaching assistants are usually well briefed and this helps them play a significant role in supporting learning.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of students are good

 The attitudes to learning displayed by students are good. They want to do well in school, concentrate on their studies and are prone to few distractions. Students work constructively together because they get on well with one another and their teachers.  The school has worked successfully to improve behaviour in recent years and students are confident in the school’s systems to promote a calm and cohesive community. Pastoral leaders are influential in promoting positive attitudes and are well regarded by students. Exclusions have fallen in the last three years.  Students show good awareness of the various types of bullying, such as through texting. They report that incidents are very rare in this harmonious place and are confident that, if it should occur, it would be rigorously dealt with.  Personal, social and health education sessions ensure that students have a good grasp of how to stay safe in their daily lives. They are well aware of the potential dangers of the internet as well

p.5

The behaviour and safety of students are good

as how to stay safe on the busy local roads.  Considerable efforts have been made by the school to address formerly low levels of attendance. Key appointments, such as an educational welfare officer shared with the partner school (although mainly employed in Pittville), have had a significant impact on attendance and absence rates are falling. Attendance is now close to the national average. Punctuality is good.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 School leaders, particularly the headteacher, have faced significant difficulties in recent years and have worked energetically to overcome them. For example, the large budget deficit of three years ago has now been eliminated. Weaknesses in leadership and management and elsewhere have been tackled through the effective use of performance management; in consequence, there has been a higher than expected turnover of staff. The new appointments have brought numerous qualities that have considerably strengthened the leadership and management team so the school is well placed to move forwards.  The headteacher has shown commitment and determination in addressing difficulties. Many staffing changes and more rigorous checks have promoted higher expectations among staff and students and have started to raise achievement and improve teaching. The local authority provides adequate support in addressing weaknesses. The new plans for the future being

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

developed are convincing but need greater precision and more opportunities for the progress made towards meeting objectives to be checked on. The school’s track record of tackling concerns means it has the capacity for continuing improvement.  Checks made on teaching are regular and systematic. The school uses its close links with a local teaching school to help coach its staff and show them examples of best practice. The school’s comprehensive progress data are used to hold staff to account for the achievement of each student she or he teaches. This sharpening of practice and the good training opportunities offered to teachers to develop their skills have improved teaching. However, these developments are relatively recent and the impact on students’ progress and attainment has been limited.  The school provides three pathways of study to match students’ needs; these are adjusted annually to best meet the changing needs of each group of students. The school is alert to

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

students’ needs; for example, in a Year 8 literacy week initiative, each subject delivered lessons that actively promoted literacy skills. Staff are well aware of external pressures that are changing the courses that schools offer and are well trained to keep abreast of current developments.  A range of additional activities, including interesting educational visits, has been introduced in recent years to enrich students’ experiences. These are popular and students are particularly complimentary about the sport and exercise opportunities that go beyond the usual activities to offer sports like handball and numerous dance activities. A well-planned and delivered briefing programme offers older students valuable information about educational and other opportunities available at the ages of both 16 and 18, where the expertise of a local university has been tapped to broaden students’ horizons.  Students’ social and moral development is well promoted through the numerous responsibilities

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

they hold, such as acting as leaders in the house system and working as prefects. This fosters a strong sense of community and the pupil parliament provides students with a good forum to express their own ideas, confident in the knowledge that they will be listened to and that, wherever possible, actions will be taken to address any concerns. Assemblies cover a wide range of relevant themes and offer students a chance to reflect on their lives and those of others who are more disadvantaged.  The governance of the school:  Members of the governing body are passionate about Pittville and are proud of improvements that have been made. They receive regular training and have a good understanding of the school’s attainment data and what it shows about students’ progress compared with national averages. They understand the work leaders have done, using performance management to address underperformance in teaching and know about the links between teachers’

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

performance and their pay progression. They are regularly informed about the school’s plans for the distribution of pupil premium funds but do not check up on the results of the spending in enough depth, so cannot say whether it provides good value for money. Governors take their responsibilities for health and safety seriously and work with external agencies to keep up with current issues. This contributes to the school’s effective safeguarding arrangements.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its students’ needs. This ensures that students are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its students’ needs. Students are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its students an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 115772 Local authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 426863

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Comprehensive School category Community Age range of students 11–16 Gender of students Mixed Number of students on the school roll 568 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Amanda Ford Headteacher Richard Gilpin Date of previous school inspection 7–8 November 2011 Telephone number 01242 524787 Fax number 01242 228750 Email address achieve@pittville.gloucs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion