Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Katrina Gueli
- Postcode verified
WF5 0DQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Your monitoring and that carried out by the acting deputy headteacher are successfully pinpointing where inconsistencies or less effective practice need to be quickly addressed. p.2
- The academy should take further action to: p.1
- For example, their recent training on school performance data and recognition that they must satisfy themselves that data are accurate is resulting in more challenge for the academy’s leaders. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 946
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs J Rush Headteacher St Ignatius Catholic Primary School Storrs Hill Road Ossett West Yorkshire WF5 0DQ
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 24 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders, the Academy Council and the trust are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
rapidly develop leadership capacity beyond the headteacher and acting deputy headteacher ensure expertise within other trust schools and beyond is used effectively to accelerate the pace of improvement provide teachers with bespoke support to ensure all teaching is at least consistently good.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, the acting deputy headteacher, the academy’s improvement adviser and a representative of the Bishop Konstant Academy Trust. I toured the school with two pupils from Year 6 and met with a CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :gail.hill@cfbt.com
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
group of teaching and non-teaching staff. I evaluated the academy’s action plan and scrutinised other documents including unvalidated data from national tests and assessments in 2013.
p.2
Context
Since the academy’s section 5 inspection, the deputy headteacher has retired and an interim deputy headteacher has been appointed, initially for one term. One class teacher has left the school and one newly qualified teacher has been appointed. An existing teacher has taken on the role of special educational needs coordinator and another has taken on the role of literacy coordinator. At the time of this monitoring inspection one teacher was absent long term due to ill health.
p.2
Main findings
The Academy Council, the trust and you were fully accepting of the findings of the inspection. Staff who met with me are committed to supporting the academy’s improvement and appreciate how your leadership is helping them to be more effective. The improvement plan identifies the academy’s position at the time of the inspection honestly and sets out clear actions, with measurable milestones, to ensure it is on track to become good. Unvalidated outcomes for pupils in Year 2 and Year 6 in 2013 are improved in a number of key areas. However, you rightly recognise that improving writing is a priority. You and your staff have worked hard to ensure that the accuracy of the assessment of pupils’ work has improved since the inspection. This is allowing teachers and leaders to identify more effectively pupils who are not making enough progress. The academy’s use of intervention is more sharply focused and more extensive so a greater number of pupils are being
p.2
Main findings
helped to make-up lost ground. However, it is too soon to measure the impact of this extra support as it has only been put in place very recently. Additional guidance for staff on what is expected in their planning has been welcomed and this is helping to ensure work is better matched to the needs of individuals in each class. Teachers’ sharing of planning is helping to ensure that pupils in the same year group, but in different classes, have equitable learning experiences. The application of the academy’s new marking policy is increasing the quality and consistency of feedback to pupils. Furthermore, the expectation that pupils will take immediate steps to improve their work or consolidate their understanding is having a positive impact on their learning.
p.2
Main findings
The drive for improvement remains heavily reliant on your leadership. This is because some leaders are new and others with leadership roles require considerable support and training to enable them to develop the skills and expertise needed to make a significant contribution to the academy’s improvement. Your monitoring and that carried out by the acting deputy headteacher are successfully pinpointing where inconsistencies or less effective practice need to be quickly addressed. Professional
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
development is beginning to be more carefully tailored towards the tackling specific weaknesses in teachers’ practice.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Members of the Academy Council have continued to focus strongly on developing their skills and understanding of effective governance. For example, their recent training on school performance data and recognition that they must satisfy themselves that data are accurate is resulting in more challenge for the academy’s leaders.
p.3
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The academy purchases support from the local authority and has found this very valuable in helping to draw-up the post-Ofsted improvement plan and in providing additional expertise and challenge. The academy’s improvement adviser has also successfully brokered a useful partnership with a senior leader in another school to support the professional development and impact of the acting deputy headteacher. The trust is robust in its monitoring of the school’s performance and there is potential for the Catholic schools within the partnership to provide additional support. However, this academy-to-academy support is at an early stage of development and, as yet, is not helping to accelerate improvement.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Academy Council, the Bishop Konstant Academy Trust, the Director of Children’s Services for Wakefield and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion