Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Melanie Knowles

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Melanie Knowles

  • Postcode verified

    TN23 7HQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengtheffectivecleareffectively
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
602
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Simon Way Headteacher Victoria Road Primary School Victoria Road Ashford TN23 7HQ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 24 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you and your staff made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 increase the capacity of the governing body to challenge and support school leaders  include more action points and measurable targets for the Early Years Foundation Stage in the school’s development plan.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, three members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also met with a group of pupils. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I looked at minutes of meetings of the governing body, information on pupils’ progress and considered teachers’ long-term planning. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

The school staff is back to full strength following a period when three teachers were away on maternity leave.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have a clear vision for the school and are determined to build on recent improvements as quickly as possible. The headteacher has drawn up a well- focused action plan that addresses the areas for improvement in the inspection report. Although, there are clear measurable targets for pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2 in the plan, there are no targets for pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage and very few specific actions to improve outcomes for children in the Reception class.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have begun work to implement the action plan and have made some important changes. For example, the checks made on teaching have been strengthened so that there is a greater focus on the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress in lessons and over time.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body fulfils its statutory duties, but is below full strength and does not currently have the capacity to challenge and support school leaders effectively. The local authority has commissioned a review of the school’s governance and this will help governors to review their systems and processes for keeping the school under review. School leaders have agreed to send HMI a copy of the report on the outcome of the review and any subsequent action plan.

p.2

External support

The local authority adviser has a good working relationship with the headteacher. She visits the school regularly and provides appropriate challenge and support to the senior leadership team. The progress of the school is reviewed formally every six weeks and success is measured against the short-term and long-term targets in the school development plan. This is helping school leaders to drive improvement quickly.

p.2

External support

The governing body will need additional support and training from the Governor Services Team to improve its effectiveness.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Kent County Council.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion