Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Elaine Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elaine Taylor

  • Postcode verified

    SS12 0LZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 16% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearaccuratepositiveimprovedsuccessfulpreciseclearlyimproving
Criticismlackweakdelayspersistent absencenot effectiveslowlyexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
825
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
25%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Marian Spinks The Bromfords School Grange Avenue Wickford SS12 0LZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 26 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. The school should take immediate action to:

p.1

School

 make self-evaluation more precise by fully considering the impact of all actions on outcomes for students  further strengthen the monitoring of teaching by taking more opportunities to gather information on what teaching is typically like over time  refine improvement planning to include clear milestones by which leaders can judge whether the school is on course to move to good within the expected timescale. + +Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, students, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. The deputy headteacher and I observed an English lesson together and you and I made brief visits to a range of other lessons. I also joined the members of the governors’ curriculum committee at their scheduled meeting in order to give feedback on my findings and answer any questions they might have.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection, one deputy headteacher has stepped down and the academy is currently recruiting for a replacement.

p.2

Main findings

You have restructured the senior leadership team to allow you to focus more clearly on the priorities for improvement. This will be complete when you have recruited an additional deputy with the crucial role of managing the collection and analysis of data on the progress students are making. You have also started to set targets that are more challenging for students, but some delays in implementation have occurred while you wait for the appointment of the new deputy. Assessment is more accurate, especially in English, where teachers and the subject leader moderate their judgements together.

p.2

Main findings

Some weak subject leadership is still to be addressed and there is still too much variability in the quality of teaching. Students in both the main school and the sixth form confirmed this. Monitoring of the quality of teaching does not happen often enough to give a clear indication of what it is typically like for students. This lack of precision hinders the accurate identification of the most important next steps.

p.2

Main findings

Recently, leaders have instigated a system to analyse the quality of teaching to allow more personalised professional development, but this is still new and more needs to be done to share good practice. Some strategies recently planned to improve literacy have timescales in the development plan that lack urgency. Students recognise that some improvements are happening. For example, they appreciate the higher levels of challenge in the work they are given in English, PE lessons that ‘push you to the limits’ and strategies to improve their literacy in mathematics and science.

p.2

Main findings

Attendance is slowly improving and you provided some convincing evidence of the positive impact leaders are having on reducing persistent absence. Exclusions, both internal and external are falling, but are still too high, especially for boys, whose progress lags behind that of the girls. You and your senior leaders have ensured that staff share the vision for improvement and there are some aspects of the academy’s work that are raising standards. An example is the improved way in which teachers mark students’ work. Leaders have increased the emphasis on students’ outcomes in performance management. Governors are undertaking an external review. The refined committee structure aims to ensure they can offer regular challenge and gain a clearer understanding of where the academy needs to improve most.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will carry out a further visit in the spring term and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The academy has maintained good relationships with the local authority, which is brokering support and providing links with successful schools. The local authority is also challenging governors and assisting in their training and in the external review.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for insert Essex.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion