Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony O'Malley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony O'Malley

  • Postcode verified

    PE14 7SG

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousimprovingconsistentlysupportiveclearlyindependentaccuratesecure
Criticismweaknessesconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings234w0
  • Leadership427w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
661
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 34%Leadership 62%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Jill Davis Executive Headteacher Terrington St John Primary School School Road Terrington St John Wisbech PE14 7SG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 2 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in April 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you and the assistant headteacher, three governors, two members of staff, a group of pupils and a representative of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Following the previous inspection, the executive headteacher left the school and you have been appointed as executive headteacher. You are currently leading Terrington St John and the two other schools in The Three School Federation. There have been a number of other staff changes. A new assistant headteacher took up her post in Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9160 Direct email : antony.grace@serco.com September. One higher-level teaching assistant, one teaching assistant and two new midday supervisors have also joined the staff. The school is planning to become a sponsored academy later this school year.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have started the process of improving the school. For example, pupils are now having more opportunities to write, and your new marking and presentation policies are beginning to improve the quality of work in books. In response to concerns about lunchtime behaviour, you have employed additional lunchtime supervision. As a result, playtimes are happier and safer. Visits to lessons and discussions with pupils indicate that they are consistently showing better attitudes to learning. Conversations with staff show that they too are now enjoying school more. Staff welcome the changes you are making and are very supportive of your high ambition for the pupils.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s post-inspection action plan sets out very clearly what you are going to do to improve the school and who will be responsible for leading each action. The plan outlines how staff will check whether actions are working and includes ambitious targets linked to pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching. To gain an independent view of how well the plan is being implemented, a local headteacher is involved in the evaluation of its impact.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body is much more aware of its responsibilities in checking the work of the school. It now receives accurate information from school leaders and so can ask pertinent questions about pupils’ achievement. Members of the governing body are reorganising the way in which they work. For example, named governors now have responsibility for holding leaders to account for the progress of disadvantaged children and for improving attendance.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority produced a statement of action following the previous inspection. The statement has a number of weaknesses. For example, it does not explain the factors that were considered which led to the decision to keep the school open. It identifies a range of support the local authority will secure to help the school. However, to date, it has resulted in very little help. Much more useful has been the part played by the local authority in commissioning you to act as executive headteacher and the appointment of an additional governor who is guiding the school through the process of becoming a sponsored academy.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is not fit for purpose. The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion