Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Trevor Riddiough
- Postcode verified
NG13 0AX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 970
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Jonathan Sherwin Executive Principal Belvoir High School and Melton Vale Post 16 Centre Barkestone Lane Bottesford NG13 0AX
p.1
and Melton Vale Post 16 Centre
Following my visit to your academy on 30 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
and Melton Vale Post 16 Centre
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
and Melton Vale Post 16 Centre
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Nevertheless, the academy should take immediate action to:
p.1
and Melton Vale Post 16 Centre
clarify the roles, responsibilities and management structures for heads of subject, senior leaders, the head of school, executive principal and the governing body to strengthen accountability across the academy carry out an external review of governance.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit I met with you, the head of school, members of the senior leadership team, the head of sixth form, the Chair of the Governing Body and another governor. I scrutinised a range of documentation. This included data relating to students’ attainment and progress at Key Stage 4 and in the sixth form. The head of school took me on a tour of the high school and we made brief visits to a range of classes. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9168 Direct email : beverley.joyner@serco.com
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection in May 2013, there have been no significant changes in academy leadership or staffing.
p.2
Main findings
The head of school and staff have undertaken a range of activities to further improve students’ learning and their subsequent achievement at Belvoir High School. Senior leaders have stepped up the frequency of student progress reviews and lesson monitoring to improve teaching. They have also improved performance reviews of departments to ensure that teachers are more accountable for the progress of the students they teach. The action plan has been revised with clear targets added and a new tracking system has been developed showing patterns of progress for all students across the school. Staff are now clear about the expectations of progress for all students. A range of scrutiny, such as reviews of students’ work, analyses of assessments and learning walks gauge how much progress students are making. All of this is helpful. While achievement has been sustained at the sixth form centre at above-average levels, it has dropped at the
p.2
Main findings
high school. For example, the percentage of students gaining five good grades at GCSE including English and mathematics fell from 71% in 2012 to 58% in 2013 which is 11% below its target. While progress levels have been maintained in English at above average, they fell in mathematics to broadly average levels.
p.2
Main findings
At the inspection in May, it was recommended that the academy formalised links between middle leaders, senior leaders, the head of school, executive principal and the governing body to strengthen accountability. By the first monitoring inspection in July this had not happened and the academy was urged to attend to this urgently. It is evident from this visit that the roles, responsibilities and management structures have still not been clarified and this is having a detrimental effect on the leadership and management at Belvoir High School. This situation has the potential to stall the school’s progress unless important management roles and responsibilities are secured.
p.2
Main findings
The excessive time that it is taking to restructure management roles means that sustained progress is fragile. The governing body is in the process of addressing this, but a number of pertinent issues remain. The executive principal has prime responsibility for the quality of teaching and learning, as well as the oversight and management of all monitoring activities at both the high school and sixth form centre. The lack of clearly defined roles and responsibilities at the next level makes it difficult for leaders and governors to know who is directly responsible for the provision and who to hold accountable for the progress being made.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has made efforts to resolve the difficulties arising from unclear leadership roles and responsibilities. It has very recently appointed an independent school improvement partner who is able to provide advice and guidance in seeing this through. This is a good step forward. The external review of governance is now planned for.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. I therefore intend to return in the late autumn term to review the progress that the academy has made in tackling the issues identified above. I will then report to the governing body on the progress that the academy is making in relation to the actions taken since the previous inspection and their impact on school improvement.
p.3
External support
The academy has now appointed an independent external school improvement partner with experience of working in multi-school trusts. Plans are already in place for her to support the academy in achieving the action points described above and to provide an external view of the quality of key aspects of provision across the academy. HMI has requested the school improvement partner to keep a close scrutiny of the high school, especially focusing on the impact of the executive principal’s leadership on raising standards and improving teaching.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Leicestershire, The Education Funding Agency and the DfE Academies Advisers Unit.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion