Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Gregory
- URN verified
EY376196
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some of the requirements were met at the monitoring visit on 04 July 2013, however at the time you failed to comply with the action to ensure that minimum legally allowed adult: child ratios are maintained at all times and at the visit you were issued with a caution for this failure to comply with the notice. p.1
- This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder has taken all the required action to address the issues from inspection and this was discussed. p.2
- She is now clear about the ratios required when working alone, and with an assistant present. p.2
- The space in the premises is being used for all the children including the front room and dining areas, which older children use for home work and games. p.2
- She continues to risk assess possible risks to children walking to and from school and think about how these can be reduced, written risk assessments are now in place for outings which identify potential hazards and the steps she takes to reduce these. p.2
- She uses her assistant during the week to care for children whilst she collects from school and has the required permission for sole care in place. p.2
- Children's records have been placed into individual folders and are accessible for inspection by Ofsted. p.2
- The childminder has learning journals in place for p.2
- However these are in the early stages and do not yet fully link to planning for each child, a further visit will be required to monitor progress in this area. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 662
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 24 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Yvonne Johnson, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 18/09/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
As a result of our inspection on 07/05/2013, we sent you a welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
In order to ensure that children learn and develop well and are kept healthy and safe you were issued with a welfare requirements notice. This required you to ensure that minimum legally allowed adult: child ratios are maintained at all times; ensure indoor space requirements are met and assess and minimise risks to children's safety when walking to and from school. Some of the requirements were met at the monitoring visit on 04 July 2013, however at the time you failed to comply with the action to ensure that minimum legally allowed adult: child ratios are maintained at all times and at the visit you were issued with a caution for this failure to comply with the notice. Since this visit you have maintained ratios to comply with the requirements and on the visit of 18 September 2013 you were found to be in ratio.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
You were also issued with a notice of actions to improve, which required you to: ensure that information from observations and assessments is effectively used to identify children's levels of achievement, learning styles and interests. Use the information to shape learning experiences for each child that reflect the observations; establish links with other providers of the Statutory framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage to provide consistency in learning, in order to support transitions as children move on in their early education; ensure that all legally required information about each child is recorded and made available at inspection.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time you are making satisfactory improvement overall.
p.1
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
The childminder has taken all the required action to address the issues from inspection and this was discussed. She is now clear about the ratios required when working alone, and with an assistant present. The space in the premises is being used for all the children including the front room and dining areas, which older children use for home work and games. She continues to risk assess possible risks to children walking to and from school and think about how these can be reduced, written risk assessments are now in place for outings which identify potential hazards and the steps she takes to reduce these. She uses her assistant during the week to care for children whilst she collects from school and has the required permission for sole care in place. Children's records have been placed into individual folders and are accessible for inspection by Ofsted. The childminder has learning journals in place for
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
children and is recording observations of significant events in each child's development, these identify next steps for the child. However these are in the early stages and do not yet fully link to planning for each child, a further visit will be required to monitor progress in this area. Since the inspection the childminder has thought about how she works with other settings which children attend and ways of improving working together for children. She has developed a form for parents about the sharing of information between settings and has spoken to schools and other settings about the care she provides.
p.2
Next steps
Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:
p.2
Next steps
The childminder has made satisfactory progress in addressing the points for improvement. The next visit will be a further monitoring visit.
p.2
Next steps
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.2
Next steps
Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion