Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Haimo Primary School

Inspected 18 Sept 2013 · published 9 Oct 2013 · URN 100129

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Sept 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Clementina Olufunke Aina, Mina Drever, Robert Eyre-Brook

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SE9 6DY

  • Name on report verified

    Haimo Primary School

  • URN verified

    100129

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 16% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressgood progressoutstandingexcellentvery wellrapid progressimprovedwell prepared
Criticisminadequatenot outstandingrequires improvementnot consistentlynot yetseriousweaknessesinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1293w+64
  • Leadership846w+37
  • What needs to improve83w+58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,137
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 28%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Haimo Primary School Haimo Road, Eltham, London, SE9 6DY

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils achieve well. They have made good progress over the last three years in reading, writing and especially in mathematics.  Attainment is above the national average at the end of Year 6 pupils. The achievement of more able pupils has improved and is also good.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress and are well prepared for the move to Year 1.  The quality of teaching is usually good. There is a good focus on literacy across the curriculum. In some classes, pupils make especially good progress in mathematics. Marking tells pupils clearly about how to improve their work.  Leaders and managers make rigorous and regular checks on the quality of teaching and on pupils’ progress.  Pupils behave well in the classroom and around the school.  Leaders, governors and staff are all committed to raising standards and have made improvements to pupils’ progress and the

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

quality of teaching since the previous inspection.  Governors are passionate about providing the best possible education for the children in the school’s community and make sure that school leaders are well on the way to doing so.  The areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection have been successfully addressed showing the school has good capacity to continue to improve.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teaching is not yet outstanding. There is inconsistency in the way teachers plan work that is interesting enough for pupils to be fully captivated and produce the best they can do, especially in subjects other than English and mathematics.  Although pupils who receive extra funding make good progress, there remains a gap between their attainment and that of their peers.  Although the school has a variety of strategies in place to engage with parents, these have not been successful in reaching some groups of parents.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 14 lessons, 11 of which were carried out jointly with the headteacher and with the deputy headteacher. They listened to pupils read and looked at their workbooks to see how much progress they make.  Meetings were held with the senior management team, with a number of subject and other leaders, with teachers and teaching assistants, with the Chair of the Governing Body and with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors talked to pupils, parents and carers to see how they feel about the school in general.  Inspectors looked at all the relevant documents, including the school’s self-evaluation, the school’s improvement plan and policies, including those regarding behaviour and attendance, and the safeguarding of all pupils.  Inspectors examined the most recent government data on the attainment of pupils in the school and the school’s system for checking on pupils’ progress through the school year.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 In addition, inspectors took account of the responses by parents and carers to an independent survey commissioned by the school on parents’ opinions of the school. There were no opinions expressed by parents on the online questionnaire (Parent View).  Responses from 30 members of staff to the staff questionnaires were also considered.

p.2

Inspection team

Mina Drever, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Robert Eyre-Brook Additional Inspector Clementina Olufunke Aina Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a larger-than-average primary school, with more boys than girls.  About two thirds of the pupils are White British, the rest are from other ethnic backgrounds. The largest group is Other White, followed by Africans, White and Black Caribbeans, Indian and Other Mixed backgrounds.  About a quarter of pupils speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported through school action and school action plus is above average. There are currently no pupils with a statement of special educational needs in the school.  The proportion of pupils in receipt of additional government funding (pupil premium) is much higher than the national average, at more than half of pupils on roll. In this school the grant is provided for pupils entitled to free school meals.  Children can join the Early Years Foundation Stage either in Nursery or in Reception.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The school is one of a mutually supportive cluster of seven schools, working together to raise standards. The cluster includes one nursery school and one secondary.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning from good to outstanding by:  extending the good practice established in English and mathematics to the other subjects in the curriculum  ensuring more consistency of approach between classes and sharing best practice, so that the progress of pupils eligible for the pupil premium is more consistent.  Further strengthen the partnership with parents and carers so that all groups are well informed about their children’s learning and progress and able to support them.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils achieve well from their different starting points. Children join the Early Years Foundation Stage well below the stages of development typical of their age. They make good progress and are well prepared for entry into Year 1.  Attainment has been on an upward trend for the last three years, and is above the national average by the end of Year 6. The proportion of pupils attaining higher levels at both Key Stages 1 and 2 has risen considerably. For example, one in five pupils in Year 6 reached the highest level 6 in mathematics.  The most able pupils have attained higher levels in reading, writing and mathematics than in previous years. Tasks are well matched to their ability and, as a result, they make very good progress.  Pupils make good progress overall in reading, writing and mathematics. In some classes there are examples where pupils make rapid progress in mathematics as a result of well-judged

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

intervention strategies. For example, in a Year 5 class, pupils made good progress in making choices about addition methods and explaining the reasons for their choices as a result of the teacher making sure that they used correct mathematical language and understood its meaning.  Similar good progress in understanding appropriate scientific language was made by Year 2 pupils when learning to identify appropriate body parts, whilst a Year 6 class made strides in their imaginative writing as a result of the teacher’s step-by-step monitoring and checking of each individual pupil’s story.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported at school action plus make good progress in all year groups. Those supported at school action in Year 5 and Year 6 made rapid progress in mathematics last year. Their attainment is mostly above the national average.  The high proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium make good progress overall and

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

achieve well. However, the pace of their progress varies across different year groups because the most effective strategies to promote their progress are not consistently followed. Whilst these pupils reach higher standards in English and mathematics than all pupils nationally in 2012, a gap remained between their attainment and that of their peers. In English, they were about one and a half terms behind other pupils, and in mathematics it was around half a term.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is generally well structured so that it secures good progress for all pupils, from different starting points, including pupils entitled to the pupil premium funding and the most able.  Teaching is not outstanding because there are inconsistencies in the application of good practice in subjects other than English and mathematics and because strategies to promote the best progress of pupils eligible for the pupil premium are not followed consistently in all classes.  Provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage provides a wealth of opportunities for children’s physical and language development. Their curiosity for the world is stimulated by the great variety of equipment in the outdoor area which fires their imagination. Adults join in the children’s sense of wonder with genuine interest.  In many lessons, learning involves exciting activities such as drama to stimulate concentration and build up understanding in preparation for later writing. Oral preparation for fiction writing

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

generates a keen desire in pupils to write good stories.  Pupils in receipt of extra funding and the disabled and those with special educational needs benefit from the individually targeted support of highly trained teaching assistants, as a result of which they make good progress in lessons. This progress is made possible by setting appropriate work for different ability levels in the class, including the most able, who take great pride in being challenged beyond their current levels of achievement.  Teachers check pupils’ understanding and progress regularly during lessons, making intelligent use of talk partners and class discussions.  The very best teaching practices actively involve the whole class in collective learning experiences. For example, a class was asked to comment on one pupil’s excellent explanation of how he solved a complex mathematical operation. Comments showed that other pupils had

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

thought hard and learned from this.  Marking is of a very high quality, based on a three-way dialogue between teachers and pupils, who have to show that they have understood what needs to be done to improve their work. This applies to class work and homework.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils represent very well the school’s ethos of responsible and respectful behaviour towards one another and the community.  Pupils’ behaviour in classrooms reflects their eagerness to learn. Pupils are very keen to do well, therefore they behave responsibly. They use any equipment appropriately and sensibly, including in the playground. They collaborate well in pair and group work. When working independently, they focus well on their tasks.  Teachers manage behaviour well in class so that learning is rarely disrupted. Pupils know the routines well and respond respectfully to adults’ reminders to maintain responsible behaviour.  Attendance is above the national average and punctuality is excellent.  Parents have confidence in the way the school instils the principles of discipline and good conduct at all times. They know that leaders and teachers deal with any incident immediately and effectively. This applies also to occasional incidents of bullying mentioned by one or two

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

parents and pupils.  The school’s strategies to promote good behaviour at all times, in the forms of rewards and sanctions, are well embedded and have a positive impact on learning and progress in the classroom.  Pupils feel very safe and their parents agree that they are safe. They understand all forms of bullying, including cyber bullying.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 Leadership and management are good because leaders and governors have improved the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement since the previous inspection. They have fully addressed the issues identified at that inspection and, therefore, show a good capacity to improve the school even further.  Leaders have rigorous systems in place to monitor the quality of teaching and track pupils’ progress and attainment, as a result of which achievement has improved considerably in 2013. Senior leaders, middle managers and all staff share a very ambitious vision to pursue excellence. They are confident that they are working towards providing an outstanding education for their pupils.  Disabled pupils and those with specific educational needs are accurately assessed, their progress reviewed regularly and interventions adjusted based on accurate interpretation of progress data. The extra government funding is spent wisely and well to cater for all aspects of education,

p.5

The leadership and management are good

including visits and visitors who fire pupils’ imagination and inspire them to aspire to be better writers and to love reading. Central to interventions is a strong focus on the development of literacy across the curriculum.  These programmes are having a positive impact on the progress of pupils supported by the pupil premium, although their rate of progress is uneven across different classes. The school is monitoring this continuously and is taking steps to improve this.  The school’s self-evaluation is accurate and rigorous. The related school improvement plans are linked firmly to raising achievement.  The school works in a variety of ways to engage with parents and keep them informed about their children’s progress. However, some groups of parents are not as well engaged as others, making it harder for the school and parents to work together to support pupils’ learning.  The curriculum provides opportunities for pupils to be creative and to link different aspects of

p.5

The leadership and management are good

their learning together. It also develops pupils’ spiritual, social, moral and cultural awareness well. This is done daily in assemblies, through links with schools in other countries, and through events to celebrate where pupils come from. Some pupils benefit from the Challenger Troop programme to develop a greater sense of self-worth.  Professional development for teachers has been successful in improving the quality of teaching in English and mathematics, but good practice in not as consistent as in other subjects. The teaching of modern foreign languages is in its infancy and the teaching of physical education (PE) is inconsistent. Although the school invested in a PE project, with its cluster partner school, a year ahead of the government’s 2013 initiative, it is not fully operational.  The local authority provided intensive support following the previous inspection but has now rightly stepped back to light touch involvement as the school improves and builds its own

p.6

The leadership and management are good

capacity.  Leaders meet all the statutory safeguarding requirements.  The governance of the school:  The governing body is determined to continue to balance challenging the leadership team and supporting it in its drive to raise standards even further. It has a full set of skills and is fully trained. It holds the school to account on all aspects through its four committees, and through the management of the headteacher’s performance, which is firmly linked to achievement. Governors approve policies and the performance management targets for teachers once they are satisfied that they are appropriate and workable. They approve pay increases and promotion only if teachers meet well-defined criteria for raising achievement. They know very well the strengths of the school and the aspects of teaching that require improvement. They understand progress data and play a full part in the school’s self-evaluation and school

p.6

The leadership and management are good

improvement plan. They have a good overview of the budget and make sure that the pupil premium is spent to raise the achievement of pupils in receipt of it, especially because these pupils make up about half of those on roll.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 100129 Local authority Greenwich Inspection number 425496

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 302 Chair Ms Michelle Wyer Headteacher Ms Kathleen Barnes Date of previous school inspection 5–6 October 2011 Telephone number 0208 850 4911 Fax number 0208 859 5953 Email address headteacher@haimo.greenwich.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion