Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Oct 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robin Hammerton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robin Hammerton

  • Postcode verified

    TN11 9PB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−8Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresspositiveaccuraterobusteffectivelyimprovingclearly
Criticismnot yetnot good enoughtoo lowinsufficientlynot alwaysnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings708w−8
  • What needs to improve331w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,039
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Mrs K Dodd Headteacher Shipbourne School Stumble Hill Shipbourne Tonbridge TN11 9PB

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Shipbourne School

Following my visit to your school on 18 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Shipbourne School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Shipbourne School

Senior leaders and governors are not taking incisive and urgent action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. The school should take immediate action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Shipbourne School

 boost urgently the quality of teaching throughout the school, but especially for pupils in Reception and Years 1 to 4, so that all pupils are challenged to make progress at a much quicker rate  ensure that assessments made of the pupils are fully reliable and can be used to ensure they receive challenging work, and targets, at the level of their capability  challenge and coach teachers and other staff who work with pupils daily, so that their practice firmly improves.

p.1

Evidence

Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com During the visit, I held meetings were held with you, the previous interim headteacher, representatives of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school’s action plan and other key documents, including local authority evaluations. I observed briefly each of the classes at work and scrutinised pupils’ books.

p.1

Context

You became headteacher on September 1, although you were involved in some decisions about the school before this. Other teaching staff have also begun work at the school this term.

p.2

Main findings

You have inherited a difficult situation and you are aware there is much to do to make Shipbourne School what it could and should be. You have a good vision for the school’s future and have established positive relationships with parents, governors and staff. I heard you described, understandably, as a ‘breath of fresh air’.

p.2

Main findings

The judgement that the school has not yet taken urgent and incisive action does not mean that anyone managing or working with the school recently has done anything wrong. It primarily reflects the fact that the school has not had stable and consistent leadership, which it needs.

p.2

Main findings

Last term, the interim headteacher and others did useful and well-considered work, as reported in the inspection, which steadied the school. However, it remains the case that pupils’ attainment and progress are too low, in all year groups. Teaching is, by your own account, still not good enough to make to change this significantly. The evidence I saw supports this view. The school’s data, which show how well pupils are doing in English and mathematics, although better managed than previously, are insufficiently reliable. We cannot be sure this information is fully accurate.

p.2

Main findings

Our joint visits to lessons, as well as the other evidence about teaching you have, indicated that teachers dominate lessons too much and think too much for the pupils. The pupils, at times, become passive, as the last inspection also reported. The work teachers set for pupils is not always sufficiently challenging for them. There is evidence that some of the better teaching is in Years 5 and 6.

p.2

Main findings

You have quickly learned much about individual pupils and their needs. We discussed how important it is for you to get closely alongside each of your staff, in lessons, in order to challenge and help them to improve their practice. When doing this, you will need to be very robust in your judgements and expectations. You need to make sure that every pupil is well challenged and makes good progress over time. You should be supported, and held to account, by the local authority and governing body. Both of these organisations understand the school’s needs. I will also support and challenge you.

p.2

Main findings

We usefully discussed the importance, over time, of improving the school’s broad curriculum, across all subjects. It was good to see that the pupils were going out of school, on the afternoon of my visit, for a worthwhile shared educational purpose. We discussed too the value in developing partnerships with other schools and organisations, such as the Kent music hub, to draw on their expertise. We talked about your own development needs, as a new headteacher, and considered together aspects of using the school budget most effectively.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body is appropriately organised and clearly very committed. The governors with whom I met, including the chair, also see the untapped potential in the school. I discussed with them several matters, including ensuring that their visits to the school are closely related to, and part of, the school’s strategic plan. Furthermore, you and they need to take full ownership of the school’s suitably organised current action plan, which you inherited. This should drive the school’s improvement.

p.3

Main findings

In summary, you have made a promising start. But you know that the school is not yet on track to be good at its next inspection. Your task is to change that.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. I am likely to visit the school again this term. I am likely also to visit the school later in the academic year and to report publically on that visit.

p.3

External support

The local authority is accurate in its judgements about the school. It is providing some useful support and helped oversee the school through an unstable period without a permanent headteacher. It is important that the local authority’s officer, newly linked to the school, should quickly agree with you a package of support and advice that will meet the school’s specific requirements.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Kent.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion