Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Robert Ellis
- Postcode verified
TN16 3LY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 644
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Mel Mellody The Acting Headteacher Biggin Hill Primary School Old Tye Avenue Westerham TN16 3LY
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Biggin Hill Primary School
Following my visit to your academy on 18 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Biggin Hill Primary School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in May 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with you, members of the governing body and interim academy board, a representative of the proposed sponsor, midday supervisors and teachers. Brief visits were made to classrooms to look at the impact of the actions which the academy has taken since the previous inspection. A range of documentation was reviewed, including a summary of progress against the action plan and staff handbook. The trustee’s statement of action and the academy’s improvement plan were evaluated.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection, the substantive headteacher has left the academy and there is currently an acting headteacher. The academy is seeking to become a sponsored academy with Charles Darwin School as the preferred sponsor. A reduced governing body retains responsibility for the academy, but an interim academy board has been commissioned to monitor the implementation of the academy’s action plan and Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com standards within the academy. A new inclusion manager has been appointed to strengthen the leadership team.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
Senior leaders have made a good start in beginning to improve the academy. The academy’s improvement plan sets a clear agenda for improvement and has appropriate priorities and measurable interim milestones, so that progress can be judged at suitable intervals. An external consultant, who has experience of supporting schools in special measures, has been commissioned to support the acting headteacher. A further consultant is working with the mathematics coordinator to establish clear priorities and targets to aid improvement in mathematics.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
Senior leaders hold regular meetings with support staff and this has improved communication across the academy. Staff at all levels say that they feel more included and that ‘we are a team now’. Regular monitoring of staff performance is resulting in support for teachers who are seeking to improve their practice. Expectations for behaviour management, marking, teaching and learning are set out clearly in a new staff handbook. More frequent reviews of pupils’ progress are being conducted, so that staff can accurately evaluate pupils’ progress and identify areas of learning where pupils need additional support. Staff have had training to promote a more inclusive approach to learning and an inclusion action and development plan has been written to supplement the academy’s improvement plan. Subject leadership has been reviewed and revised and teachers have had training to help them become more effective subject leaders. Many of these initiatives have only
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
recently been introduced so it is too early to see their impact on improving teaching and learning.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The possible change of academy status has meant that an external review of governance has not been completed. Within the current arrangements for governance, the responsibilities of the governing body and the interim academy board are ambiguous. This lack of clarity regarding the accountability of these two different groups is not promoting improvement effectively.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The academy’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the local authority for Bromley and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion