Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Scott Primary School & Nursery
Summary
Tusha Chakraborti (lead), Matthew Klimcke
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Sept 2013
- Inspectorssingle source
Matthew Klimcke, Tusha Chakraborti
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
MK41 7JA
- Name on report verified
Scott Lower School
- URN verified
109512
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- They respond very well to the school’s positive approach to behaviour and grow as confident learners. p.5
- Disabled students and those who have special educational needs, including those with specific social and emotional needs, are nurtured very well and they make good progress in their learning. p.4
- The headteacher, together with other senior leaders, communicates high expectations and is successfully driving improvement. p.6
- This contributes well to a calm and safe environment where pupils flourish. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Behaviour and safety are not outstanding because pupils’ engagement in learning is not consistently high to ensure greater progress, especially when they have spent too long listening to the teacher and become distracted. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- Teachers do not always use questioning effectively enough to deepen pupils’ skills and understanding in all subjects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Speed up pupils’ progress in mathematics, in order to match their more rapid progress in reading and writing, by: ensuring that tasks consistently provide sufficient challenge for more-able pupils making opportunities for pupils to develop mathematical skills in other subjects. p.3
- Improve the quality of teaching to outstanding, by: questioning pupils more effectively to deepen their skills and understanding in all subjects providing short and sharp introductions to lessons so that pupils have enough time to work on their tasks and consolidate their learning. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,122
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Scott Lower School Hawk Drive,, Bedford, MK41 7JA
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Measures taken to raise standards since the previous inspection have successfully improved pupils’ achievement across the school, especially in Years 3 and 4. By the end of Year 2, standards are above the national average in reading, writing and mathematics because of pupils’ good progress in all subjects. Pupils in Years 3 and 4 also make good progress. Teaching is good. All staff work successfully with senior leaders to raise achievement for all groups of pupils, including those who have particular social and emotional difficulties. Pupils enjoy coming to school and behave well in lessons and around the school. They feel safe and are proud of their school. The headteacher, well supported by staff and governors, has addressed the issues from the previous inspection effectively and brought about rapid improvements in the quality of teaching and standards of achievement. Members of the governing body carry out their
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
responsibilities effectively. They provide good support to leaders and are confident in holding the school to account.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Progress in mathematics is not as rapid as in English because teachers do not consistently provide sufficient challenge for more-able pupils or match activities closely enough to their attainment level. There are limited opportunities for pupils to develop mathematical skills through other subjects. Teachers do not always use questioning effectively enough to deepen pupils’ skills and understanding in all subjects. Sometimes, spending too long in the carpet area means that pupils do not have enough time to do their own work.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed 12 lessons, two of which were seen together with the headteacher. In addition, the inspection team made shorter visits to lessons to focus on specific aspects such as the effectiveness of support for pupils who have special educational needs and those who are eligible for the pupil premium. The inspectors also listened to groups of pupils in Years 2 and 4 reading. Discussions were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders and a local authority representative. The lead inspector met with a group of governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body. A member of the inspection team held a meeting with a group of pupils from Key stages 1 and 2. Inspectors took account of 43 responses to the online questionnaire for parents and carers, Parent View. They also analysed 20 questionnaire returns from staff. The inspection team looked at a range of documentation, including information on pupils’
p.2
Information about this inspection
performance, the school’s own analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, improvement plans, safeguarding and behaviour policies, and records and documents relating to the targets set for teachers to improve their work.
p.2
Information about this inspection
Tusha Chakraborti, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Matthew Klimcke Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The school is smaller than most primary schools, even though the number of pupils has increased since September this year. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage and a higher than average proportion of pupils comes from a wide range of minority ethnic backgrounds. Very few are at the early stages of speaking English. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides funding for children in the care of the local authority and for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, is well above average. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported through school action is above average. The proportion receiving support at school action plus and who have a statement of special educational needs is average. The school is in the process of becoming a two-form entry school and has started with an additional Reception class this term.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Speed up pupils’ progress in mathematics, in order to match their more rapid progress in reading and writing, by: ensuring that tasks consistently provide sufficient challenge for more-able pupils making opportunities for pupils to develop mathematical skills in other subjects.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching to outstanding, by: questioning pupils more effectively to deepen their skills and understanding in all subjects providing short and sharp introductions to lessons so that pupils have enough time to work on their tasks and consolidate their learning.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Children enter Reception with skills and knowledge that are below the levels expected for their age, particularly in language and numeracy. They make good progress because staff have a good understanding of children’s needs and plan exciting learning experiences, well matched to their abilities.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Standards have improved over the past two years, especially in Years 3 and 4. In 2012 and 2013, pupils have achieved standards that are above the national average by the end of Year 2. The proportion of pupils exceeding the expected levels in reading and writing and mathematics is also above average.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
School assessment data and the work seen in their books and lessons, show that pupils make good progress in Years 3 and 4 and attainment by the end of Year 4 was above those expected at this stage. Progress in reading and writing has been faster that in mathematics because of the concerted actions taken by the school to raise pupils’ achievement in reading and writing. The results of the Year 1 screening check on phonics (the sounds that letters make) were significantly above average in 2012 and 2013.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils develop good reading skills. Older pupils read fluently and confidently from a wide range of books and are keen to discuss their favourite characters making reference to the texts. Younger pupils apply their knowledge of phonics well to read unfamiliar words because of the systematic and effective teaching of phonics. Pupils in Years 1 and 2 read with confidence and are keen to discuss whether their chosen books are fiction or non-fiction.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
There are no significant differences between the achievements of boys and girls or different ethnic groups. Pupils who speak English as an additional language make rapid progress and achieve standards comparable to that of their classmates.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Disabled students and those who have special educational needs, including those with specific social and emotional needs, are nurtured very well and they make good progress in their learning. This is because they are given extensive support in lessons and through carefully planned intervention programmes by teachers, teaching assistants and other support staff.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The funding for pupils eligible for the pupil premium is used well to support pupils by additional support staff and through a range of intervention sessions for individual pupils. As a result, these pupils make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics and the gap in attainment is narrowing across the school. However, the gap in Year 4 has widened from two terms in 2012 to three terms in 2013. This gap is due to the lower prior attainment of this particular group, although their progress is good. In Year 2 in 2012, pupils were on average about three terms behind their classmates. Because the support has been effective, the gap in attainment has narrowed in 2013. They are now one term behind the others.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
The quality of teaching has improved because school leaders have supported staff to provide a good education for their pupils. Staff create a positive and purposeful learning environment, and relationships across the school are consistently good. This has a very positive impact on pupils’ attitudes to learning and achievement.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Children in Reception thrive in a stimulating learning environment and are helped in pursuing activities of their own choice as well as those directed by adults. They have good opportunities to use and apply their developing literacy and numeracy skills. For example, they enjoy reading and sharing books and are becoming confident in identifying different shapes.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
In most lessons, teachers involve pupils in their learning by asking searching questions that make them think hard as well as assessing their understanding of what they have already learnt. Nonetheless, in some lessons, the opportunity is missed to deepen pupils’ skills and understanding of the topics taught through probing questioning for all groups of pupils.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers have good subject knowledge. They focus well on improving pupils’ writing skills through a range of activities. Pupils in a Year 2 lesson, for example, were observed analysing a range of adjectives to write about a good ‘pirate.’ Teachers make sure that pupils read and deepen their understanding of a range of stories, analysing the impact of key events and characters. However, pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to develop their mathematical skills in other subjects.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers usually plan tasks that are well matched to the learning needs of pupils, but this is not consistently so. In a few lessons, especially in mathematics, the planned work is not always closely enough matched to the attainment levels of the more-able pupils. Occasionally, teachers spend too long in the carpet area, leaving pupils insufficient time to work on their own and to consolidate their learning. This means pupils do not progress as well as they can in these lessons.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers mark pupils’ work regularly and effectively, providing a clear guidance as to how well pupils are doing and how to move forward to the next stage in their learning. They make sure that pupils respond to the guidance, correcting their work. This has sped up pupils’ progress considerably.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils display positive attitudes to learning. This contributes well to a calm and safe environment where pupils flourish. The school is an inclusive community, welcoming all within a culture of mutual respect and pupils value this.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils are polite and welcoming both in class and around the school. They respond very well to the school’s positive approach to behaviour and grow as confident learners.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Parents and carers are overwhelmingly positive about the school’s work. All parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire said that behaviour was good, their children were kept safe and they were happy to come to school.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils feel safe at school. They have a good understanding of various types of safety issues such as internet safety, fire and road safety. They know how to keep themselves and others safe because the school includes issues about safety in lessons. Recently, pupils in Year 3 and 4 had training on how to deliver basic emergency care from an ambulance service.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils say that incidents of bullying are rare, and are confident that adults deal with them fairly and effectively. They take on responsibilities enthusiastically. Through the school council, pupils select charities each year for which they raise funds. Attendance is average and improving because of the school’s rigorous monitoring system.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Behaviour and safety are not outstanding because pupils’ engagement in learning is not consistently high to ensure greater progress, especially when they have spent too long listening to the teacher and become distracted.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The headteacher, together with other senior leaders, communicates high expectations and is successfully driving improvement. Consequently, teaching has improved and standards of achievement have risen over the past two years.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Senior leaders make rigorous checks of pupils’ progress to find out how well pupils are achieving. All staff use information on achievement well to track the progress pupils are making and make sure that they are meeting challenging targets. Well-organised intervention programmes provide extra help for those who need it to catch up with others.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The regular management of staff performance, through checks on teaching and the progress of pupils, means that teachers receive timely opportunities for professional development. Leaders make sure that the levels of pay awarded to individual teachers reflect how well their pupils are achieving and any leadership responsibilities that they have.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
All teachers are responsible for leading one or more subjects and their role is developing well. The leadership of the Reception classes is effective in ensuring that children settle quickly and make good progress.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
A broad and well-organised curriculum provides good opportunities for many enjoyable learning experiences for all groups of pupils. Visits to places of interest and a wide range of clubs and events in school make pupils’ learning exciting and meaningful. For example, pupils attended a mock graduation ceremony in a local university and had the opportunity to interview their local Member of Parliament. These activities, along with assemblies and the study of different religions, boost pupils’ confidence and promote their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. The school has already taken action to enhance opportunities for pupils to develop their sporting skills further through the new additional funding for sports. It is too early to assess the impact at this stage.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The local authority has provided very effective support to the school which has helped it improve quickly within a short time. Leaders and governors worked effectively with the local authority to achieve this.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Parents are given good support on how they can support their children’s learning at home through a range of information evenings and newsletters.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Leadership and management are not yet outstanding because the improvements made so far have not been sustained for a long enough period to assure consistently high performance.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: Governors have a good understanding of the school, how well pupils are progressing and the effectiveness of teaching. They have been fully involved in the school’s action to improve achievement and teaching. They are aware of the results pupils attain in national tests and how they compare nationally. They set challenging objectives for the headteacher and understand how each member of staff is paid according to their experience and performance. Governors challenge leaders and ask searching questions about how any underperformance is tackled. Finances are well managed and funds available through the pupil premium have been used well to raise attainment of the targeted pupils. The governing body ensures that all national safeguarding requirements are fully met.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 109512 Local authority Bedford Inspection number 425191
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school First School category Community Age range of pupils 4–9 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 170 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Malcom Redford Headteacher Anita Barker Date of previous school inspection 17 January 2012 Telephone number 01234 352630 Fax number 01234 211366 Email address scottlower@schools.bedfordshire.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion