Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
John Spendluffe Foundation Technology College
Summary
David Martin (lead), Douglas Folan, Maggie Booth, Renee Robinson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Sept 2013
- Inspectors verified
David Martin, Douglas Folan, Maggie Booth, Renee Robinson
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LN13 9BL
- Name on report verified
John Spendluffe Foundation Technology College
- URN verified
136968
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- Behaviour is consistently very well managed to a clear school policy that has high expectations of conduct. p.5
- As a result, students develop excellent attitudes to learning, which have a positive impact on their achievement. p.5
- Tutors and other key adults know the students well as individuals, and provide an excellent quality of care and guidance. p.5
- This results in a happy, warm and respectful atmosphere in which students' many successes are celebrated. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Behaviour and safety are not outstanding because there are too few opportunities for students to manage their own behaviour in lessons when working without the direct guidance of a teacher or other adult. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise the quality of teaching so that more is outstanding by: ensuring that all lessons have the pace, challenge and high expectations seen in the very best in the school, particularly for the more able providing increased opportunities for students to be able to take responsibility for their own learning in the classroom. p.3
- Ensure that attendance continues to improve at least to the national average, by: further securing successful developments in checking patterns of absence and making early contact with parents and carers extending the partnership work with some parents and carers to make sure that students who are absent more frequently are helped to benefit from the good education that the school offers. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,274
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
John Spendluffe Foundation Technology College Hanby Lane, Alford, LN13 9BL
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. The school has at its heart the highest aspirations for all its students, in both their academic progress and wider preparation for adult life. This results in a happy, warm and respectful atmosphere in which students' many successes are celebrated. Teaching is mostly good, with some that is outstanding. Students are attentive and willing learners, so lessons are productive. Lessons are well planned, because individuals are well known to adults and their particular needs are quickly identified and met. Students are well supported in their reading. Literacy and numeracy skills are given a strong emphasis across all subjects, helping to remove potential obstacles to learning. Students conduct themselves calmly and safely around the site. They enjoy all that the school offers, including a wide range of activities, trips and visits. The standards reached by students have increased over time. In 2013 they reached
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
average levels from low starting points, which represent good achievement. Students are confident that adults will deal quickly with any difficulties that arise, including very occasional bullying or disagreements. The school is well led. Leaders, managers and governors work very effectively in cooperation, sharing responsibility for improving teaching and achievement. They seek every opportunity to improve the buildings, facilities and experiences offered to students.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Not enough lessons are outstanding in providing a strong pace, challenge and opportunities for independent learning, particularly for the most able. Attendance, although improving quickly, remains below the national average for secondary schools.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed 26 lessons taught by 26 different teachers. They also made some shorter visits to some classrooms to look at reading and group support sessions. The team observed tutor periods and visited many different areas of the school and the site during lessons and at break times. Meetings were held with three different groups of students, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body, senior staff, and subject and house leaders. The inspection team examined a range of school documentation, including school development plans and policies, lesson plans, records of lesson monitoring and checks on students’ work, and the minutes of meetings, including those of the governing body. Inspectors examined a range of data, both that available to the public and that used by the school to monitor current rates of students’ progress and attendance. There had been 21 responses made to the online questionnaire Parent View by the end of the
p.2
Information about this inspection
inspection. These were considered, alongside with staff questionnaires and surveys of parents and carers carried out by the school.
p.2
Inspection team
David Martin, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Douglas Folan Additional Inspector Maggie Booth Additional Inspector Renee Robinson Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a smaller-than-average non-selective secondary school in a selective area. It converted to become an academy in September 2011. When its predecessor school, also known as John Spendluffe Foundation Technology College, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be outstanding. The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium, extra government funding to narrow gaps in achievement by students eligible for free school meals and looked- after children among others, is higher than average. Most students are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is higher than average. The proportion of students supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also higher than average. The school meets government floor standards, by which minimum expectations are set for
p.3
Information about this school
secondary schools. No students currently on roll attend other centres for part of their education. The headteacher takes leadership roles within local school networks, and various staff have shared good practice with other schools in the area. The school holds the Artsmark Silver, Healthy Schools status and International Schools award.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise the quality of teaching so that more is outstanding by: ensuring that all lessons have the pace, challenge and high expectations seen in the very best in the school, particularly for the more able providing increased opportunities for students to be able to take responsibility for their own learning in the classroom.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that attendance continues to improve at least to the national average, by: further securing successful developments in checking patterns of absence and making early contact with parents and carers extending the partnership work with some parents and carers to make sure that students who are absent more frequently are helped to benefit from the good education that the school offers.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Students develop a good range of skills and knowledge across the school. A strong focus on developing literacy skills in all subjects has been a major factor in the impressive improvement in attainment since the academy was formed.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The extensive reading programme that begins at the start of Year 7, both in class and through small group and individual support, has had a very strong impact on raising reading ages, enabling students to read confidently in all subjects.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Students also display good numeracy skills and attainment in mathematics has improved strongly. The emphasis on learning thinking skills leads to very positive attitudes to learning in all subjects. These initiatives show a good use of Year 7 catch-up funding.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Some students have been entered early for mathematics GCSE in the winter term of Year 11, although many are re-entered in the summer if they do not reach or exceed their target grades. This does not limit the more able from reaching their potential grades.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The progress made from low starting points has accelerated over time. Many students made expected levels of progress in English and mathematics in 2012. The 2013 results show a leap forward in attainment and progress, although the most able could still make better progress.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The English results in the summer of 2012 were disappointing, and lower than expected. The school successfully entered 24 students for the special opportunity to retake the examination in November. Almost all were successful in gaining a C grade pass.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The school quickly identifies the particular support required by disabled students and those who have special educational needs. Effective extra help from the learning support team, and good information held by all class teachers means that these students are able to make at least the same progress as other students.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Students who are known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium also make good progress. By the time they leave school, these students are only half a grade on average behind other students overall, and significantly less than that in English. Their progress is sometimes even more rapid than that of other students because of a good range of well-targeted support.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
School records indicate that the great majority of the teaching in the school is consistently good. Inspectors agree with these findings, and did see a minority of lessons where teaching and learning were outstanding. No teaching was inadequate or required improvement.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Lessons are typically well-planned, and relationships are very strong. Students are keen to engage, and learning proceeds at a good pace. Students make strong gains in skills, knowledge and understanding in all subjects. Work seen in books is well presented and detailed.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Planning is very thorough, with a variety of learning activities that engage and interest students. Assessment is used well to help students to understand what is expected and how well they are doing. There are many opportunities for them to assess their own and others' work. Marking is thorough, and students know what their targets are and how to achieve them. This is reinforced strongly in tutor time and in subject lessons. Some helpful, constructive comments are given, although the systems used are not totally consistent across the school.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers have detailed information about individual students, and use this well to cater for the needs of different abilities, particularly those who may find learning more difficult. Most students as a result have work of a suitable level and can make good progress in their learning.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers use questioning well to involve all students. They target questions skilfully so that all can enjoy success, often giving time for thinking or brief discussion. Opportunities are taken for students to build on each others' ideas and extend their initial responses.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
In the best lessons, the more able have extension activities and expectations of what they can achieve are very high. This was not seen in all lessons, where opportunities were occasionally missed to move some students on more quickly to more demanding tasks.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Few examples were seen of students being required to work independently of the teacher for parts of the lesson, and to take greater responsibility for their own learning. However, students work well together to discuss and complete tasks when given the opportunity.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Behaviour is consistently very well managed to a clear school policy that has high expectations of conduct. As a result, students develop excellent attitudes to learning, which have a positive impact on their achievement.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Tutors and other key adults know the students well as individuals, and provide an excellent quality of care and guidance. Students report that there is always an adult that they can get help from if they have any personal or work issues.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Students are respectful towards each other and adults and conduct themselves very safely and sensibly on the site. There is an active school council who gave inspectors examples of how well their opinions are listened to, and how they have contributed to improving the school.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The vertical tutor system enables many older students to support and help younger ones, for example helping them to set their own learning targets. Year 7 students reported that they were helped to settle in quickly and that other students are kind and welcoming.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Different types of bullying such as cyber- and prejudice-based discrimination are well understood. Students say that bullying incidents are rare and feel confident that adults deal with any issues quickly. Parental responses support this view, and that students are safe and happy.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Attendance is improving quickly as school initiatives are having an impact. However, attendance remains below average overall, and for those more regularly absent from school. The school recognises that current efforts need to be sustained with the support of parents and carers.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school records absence, punctuality and any behavioural problems rigorously. Fixed-term exclusions are below average. The school works very effectively with students whose circumstances may make them more vulnerable or who present more challenging problems. Behaviour and safety are not outstanding because there are too few opportunities for students to manage their own behaviour in lessons when working without the direct guidance of a teacher or other adult.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Governors, leaders and managers are ambitious for the academic and personal development of every student, and determined to overcome barriers to success. This is seen across the school in literacy work, especially reading, and the wide range of opportunities available to all.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
A great deal of work is done to celebrate student success and build confidence within a harmonious school community. Any discrimination, harassment or poor behaviour is robustly challenged, so that students are confident that they are able to learn without distraction.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
A key feature of the school is that leaders and managers at all levels accept responsibility for student success through improving teaching and learning. This is seen in the consistent application of school policy by subject leaders, house leaders and other key staff.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Senior leaders monitor and evaluate the school thoroughly, and their self-evaluation of strengths and areas for improvement is very accurate. Plans to improve the school are clear and well explained, with a suitable number of appropriate key objectives and activities.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Lesson observation findings, reviews of teacher performance and regular sampling of lessons by senior staff all feed into highly targeted staff training. This is one of the main reasons that teaching has become so consistently good.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The teaching and learning group and subject leaders group are crucial in sharing good practice. The school also has detailed data about student progress which is used in lessons and checked regularly by senior staff, so that any underperformance is quickly identified and support given.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Various groups of students have been identified for additional support. As a result, gaps in performance are closing quickly. The school tracks the support that is provided to those eligible for pupil premium funding to ensure that their needs are met.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The curriculum is highly tailored to the different needs of students. Recent changes to shorten Key Stage 3 have given Year 9 students the opportunity to study some subjects in greater depth. Students receive good, independent advice on future choices for when they leave school.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The school plays a prominent role in the local area and is outward looking, for example in seeking to share its facilities with the community. Student opportunities are enhanced and enriched by an extensive range of activities, trips, visits and visitors.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Students are very well prepared for life in modern British society, despite the school's remote, coastal location. The school has built strong links and partnerships locally, nationally and internationally to broaden students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Leadership and management are not outstanding because the achievement of pupils, though improving quickly, has not been maintained at a high level over a period of time, and a small number of more-able students are still not achieving their full potential. The governance of the school: Governors are well informed about all aspects of the school's work, including pupil premium funding and student progress and attainment. They gather first-hand information from regular visits and seek professional support from experienced consultants when required. Governors understand that the quality of teaching in the school has improved due to the recruitment of skilled teachers and managers. As other staff have left the school, governors have changed responsibilities to reflect the way that the school is developing, for example the creation of a house system. Governors have reviewed performance management arrangements, and they meet Teachers
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Standards and all regulations. They know that staff have clear teaching and student progress targets that they must meet in order to progress through the pay structure. Governors have checked that support is put in place for staff whose performance has been found to need improving. Several staff have had their roles and responsibilities adjusted, and some staff have had their efforts rewarded by additional responsibility and promotion. The Governors have sharpened their own skills by undertaking Governor Quality Mark accreditation. This is further increasing their awareness of their roles, responsibilities and need for on-going training. Governors have successfully sought additional funding, and have used this to improve the site and facilities, often to the additional benefit of the local community.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 136968 Local authority Lincolnshire Inspection number 412878
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 567 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Peter Milson Headteacher Steven Beverley Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01507 462443 Fax number 01507 462013 Email address office@jstc.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion