Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Bishopswood Infant School

Inspected 13 Sept 2013 · published 4 Oct 2013 · URN 116035

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Saunders (lead), Julie Sackett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Sept 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Saunders, Julie Sackett

  • Postcode verified

    RG26 3NA

  • Name on report verified

    Bishopswood Infant School

  • URN verified

    116035

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveimprovedwell preparedhighly effectiveexceptionallyfeel safepositive
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementnot alwaysnot yetnot strongdeclinetoo oftenpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings481w+7
  • What needs to improve1848w−9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,249
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 15%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

P R O T E C T – I N S P E C T I O N School report

p.1

Bishopswood Infant School Barlow Road, Tadley, RG26 3NA

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:

 Over time, leaders have not made sure that teaching challenges pupils sufficiently and standards have declined, particularly in writing and mathematics.  Considering their different starting points, the progress of pupils requires improvement, particularly in writing. More-able pupils are not always given work which is challenging enough to enable them to make the progress of which they are capable.  Teaching about linking letters and the sounds they make (phonics) is not always consistent. This constrains pupils’ progress in reading, and particularly in writing.  There remains too much teaching which requires improvement. Teachers do not readily adapt the tasks pupils are doing, when they finish their work quickly.  The period of turbulence in the leadership of the school, prior to the appointment of the current executive headteacher, has limited the effectiveness of leadership and management.  Until recently, governors have not ensured that

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:

strong leadership tackles the issues facing the school.  The development of wider leadership is very recent and is not yet sufficiently strong to bring about rapid improvements.

p.1

The school has the following strengths:

 Since taking up post a year ago, the executive headteacher has eliminated inadequate teaching and begun to develop the wider leadership within the school.  Strategies to tackle the decline in mathematics have begun to have an impact, and attainment has begun to improve significantly, especially for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs.  Children in the Reception class are well prepared for the next stage of their education.  Behaviour is good; pupils are cooperative and keen to learn. Adults’ good relationships with pupils and between themselves mean pupils feel safe and well cared for.  New arrangements for governance are having a positive impact. Governors are increasingly challenging the school to show the evidence of improvements. Inspection report: Bishopswood Infant School , 12–13 September 2013 2 of 9

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 16 lessons taught by six teachers, including groups of pupils working with teaching assistants. About a third of these observations were carried out together with senior leaders.  The inspectors looked at the work pupils have done, both during the lessons observed and over time, and spoke to pupils about their work and their views about their learning.  The inspectors met with senior leaders and teachers who have responsibility for leading aspects of the work of the school. During these meetings, inspectors looked at documents provided by the school and discussed what these show about pupils’ learning. These documents included teachers’ records about how well pupils are doing, procedures and policies to make sure pupils are safe, the school’s self-evaluation and plans for further improvements, and minutes from meetings, including those of the governing body.  Inspectors also spoke to parents and carers informally at the start and end of the school day,

p.2

Information about this inspection

and reviewed the 18 responses to Parent View, the online Ofsted survey. The inspectors also evaluated the views of staff at the school through the responses to a questionnaire, returned during the inspection.  At the time of the inspection, children in the Reception class had only very recently started staying at school for the full school day.

p.2

Inspection team

Andrew Saunders, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Julie Sackett Additional Inspector Inspection report: Bishopswood Infant School , 12–13 September 2013 3 of 9

p.2

Information about this school

 This is an average sized infant school with two classes in each year group.  Most pupils are White British. The small minority of other pupils represent a wide range of backgrounds, including a very few who speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action is slightly above average; the proportion supported at school action plus or with statements of special educational needs is average. However these proportions vary widely from year to year.  The proportion of pupils who are known to be eligible for the pupil premium is below average. This additional funding is provided by the government for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, pupils from families serving in the armed forces, and children looked after by the local authority. There are currently no children from families serving in the armed forces.

p.3

Information about this school

 In September 2013, the school federated with the junior school on the same site, although the headteacher of the junior school has been the executive headteacher for about a year. There is currently an acting deputy headteacher in post.  As well as the junior school, there is a privately run nursery on the site; this is subject to separate inspection arrangements. There is also a breakfast and after-school club run in the school, which was not inspected as part of this inspection. The school does not currently make use of any alternative provision.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of good teaching and develop more outstanding practice in the school, by making sure that:  teachers plan lessons which challenge all pupils to the full extent of their capability  teachers use the information they collect about pupils’ skills and understanding to adapt the tasks and teachers’ explanations more quickly according to the pace at which pupils learn.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the pace of progress of pupils across the school, particularly in writing, in order to raise attainment, by:  raising teachers’ expectations about the level and quality of work pupils are capable of doing, particularly pupils who are more able  providing pupils with more purposeful reasons to write, across the topics they study  increasing the consistency of teaching pupils about letters and the sounds they make, particularly in how this supports writing.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the effectiveness of leaders across the school in demonstrating and nurturing the very best practice in teaching, by:  giving teachers who lead aspects of the school more training and the time to check how well agreed strategies are being used in the classroom  working with staff to ensure that learning opportunities in the outdoor area are just as effective as those indoors, particularly in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Inspection report: Bishopswood Infant School , 12–13 September 2013 4 of 9

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 In the past, pupils have reached standards which have been above average. A decline means that standards have been closer to the average for the past two years.  Last year’s cohort of Year 2 pupils made accelerated progress in the last two terms, but this was not sufficient to make up for earlier, slower progress. Consequently the standards they reached dipped slightly below average in reading and writing.  Teachers’ records, the school’s own self-evaluation and lesson observations show that progress requires improvement. This is true for boys and girls, pupils from different minority ethnic groups and for more-able pupils.  In the phonics spelling check in Year 1, fewer pupils than average reached the expected level, because the teaching of phonics has not been consistent. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected level rose considerably in 2013.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs have previously made similar progress

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

to other pupils in the school. In 2013, the standards reached by these pupils rose, considerably so in mathematics, because of the support they receive.  Until recently, pupils who were eligible for the pupil premium reached standards which were very similar to those of other pupils in the school. In 2013, the progress of these pupils was not as strong. At the end of Year 2, these pupils were about a term behind other pupils in reading and writing, although the gap was smaller in mathematics.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage, there are good partnerships between adults, suitable resources and well-thought-out routines. This means that children settle in quickly and are keen to learn. They display great curiosity and are very cooperative, helping each other and happily taking turns. By the end of Reception, they are well prepared to continue learning in Key Stage 1. However, leaders have not yet ensured that the opportunities to learn are as enticing in the

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

outdoor area as they are indoors, particularly opportunities to write.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teaching too often requires improvement, and outstanding teaching is too rare. Not all teachers have high enough expectations of what pupils can do.  Some pupils finish their work very quickly because the tasks teachers plan for them are not always hard enough. Progress also stalls when teachers do not use the information they gather about how quickly pupils have grasped a particular skill or understanding, to adapt the task or their explanations.  Where teaching is better, pupils are encouraged to write for a wide variety of purposes. For example, children in Reception had great fun with their ‘pirate writing’ which helped them to develop their skills quickly. However, teachers are not always confident in the way they teach pupils how to link letters and the sounds they make (phonics), and there are missed opportunities to relate this to writing. Too often writing tasks lack a sense of inspiration and

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

purpose.  There is now an agreed approach to marking pupils’ work and this is being used increasingly consistently by teachers. Teaching assistants also contribute well to the feedback pupils get, so that pupils know how well they are doing. There are still too few opportunities for pupils to respond to these comments or do what teachers have suggested, and this slows pupils’ progress.  Pupils enjoy their physical education lessons, particularly outdoors, when they get the chance to make up games that develop their skills. They also like taking part in clubs and sporting activities, including football and tag rugby. This is helping pupils to appreciate the importance of healthy lifestyles.  The support given to disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is increasingly successful because their needs are carefully evaluated and the most appropriate strategies put in place. This is improving the progress these pupils make so that they make up any lost ground.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils like being at school, they behave well and are keen to learn. They get on with the tasks their teachers have planned for them and maintain good levels of concentration. Very occasionally, pupils become distracted when the tasks they are given to do are not inspiring or hard enough to keep them engaged.  Pupils say that poor behaviour is a thing of the past. The school’s success in tackling the behavioural issues of a few pupils is a significant factor in the increased progress Year 2 pupils made last year.  Pupils currently in the school need very few reminders about the expectations adults have of them, and frequently remind each other about the ‘Golden Rules’. As one pupil said to another, ‘We do not do that here!’ Parents, carers and pupils agree that behaviour has improved and is typically good.  Pupils say that there is no bullying of any kind in the school, and pupils receive training about

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

what might constitute bullying and how to help prevent it from happening in their school. They feel safe at school and get plenty of teaching about how they can help to keep themselves safe, for example on the road and about fire safety.  Older pupils like having opportunities to work and play alongside younger pupils and they are proud to be good role models for them. Pupils from different backgrounds get along very happily together. There are good relationships across the school.  The attendance of most pupils is broadly average. The school reminds parents and carers about the impact of pupils’ attendance on their performance although the attendance of a very few pupils is below average, despite the school’s best efforts.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 Changes in leadership are recent, following a period of turbulence. The new executive headteacher has quickly established an accurate view about the work of the school and has set out a clear vision for improving the situation. Close links with the junior school are helping to bring about the necessary changes. However, this has not yet had enough time to have a sustained impact on pupils’ performance over time.  The executive headteacher has accurately evaluated the quality of teaching and is effective in challenging teaching which needs to improve. Recent training has been undertaken to help teachers know what leaders expect, and records show that the proportion of teaching judged to be good is increasing. There is no longer any evidence of inadequate teaching.  Teachers who lead aspects of the school are mostly very new to the roles. While they are enthusiastic and share the vision for the school, they have not yet had time to make an impact

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

in all areas. They do not always have the experience or time to check that the best teaching strategies, which have been promoted by leaders, are being used in each lesson.  More recently, the teaching of mathematics has improved because of more effective leadership including a thorough review of what is taught and how it is taught. Similarly, there have been improvements in the resources available and the training of teachers in mathematics, to support disabled pupils and those with special educational needs.  Parents and carers have positive views about the school; some said that many things have improved since the executive headteacher took over. They feel confident that the school will continue to get even better.  The accurate self-evaluation of the executive headteacher, the widely shared vision to achieve better outcomes for pupils, the increased challenge by governors, and the recent improvements

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

in mathematics, show that the school has the capacity to continue improving.  The local authority provides a medium level of support for the school, and has helped the governors make the transition to the federation of the junior and infant schools. The level of support has diminished as the executive headteacher has shown that improvements are taking place.  The governance of the school:  Until recently, governors had not ensured there is strong leadership of the school and this has led to the decline in achievement. Since merging with the governing body of the junior school, governance has improved. Together with the executive headteacher, governors now have a more accurate view about the issues the school needs to tackle, and are making sure that these issues are given a high priority. They have supported the executive headteacher in making sure that the levels of pay awarded to teachers reflect the quality of their teaching,

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

and that teachers have appropriate training. Governors work with the school to evaluate how effective the pupil premium is proving in improving outcomes for eligible pupils. With the executive headteacher, they check that all groups of pupils have equality of opportunity and that any potential discrimination is challenged.  Governors make sure that the school meets its statutory requirements, that staff are trained to understand their responsibilities in keeping pupils safe, and that procedures for recruitment ensure adults working with pupils are appropriate to do so. Members of the governing body increasingly undertake training to keep themselves up to date with developments. They have improved their knowledge of the quality of teaching, and of how the performance of the school compares with that of others Inspection report: Bishopswood Infant School , 12–13 September 2013 7 of 9

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. Inspection report: Bishopswood Infant School , 12–13 September 2013 8 of 9

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 116035 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 426441

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Infant School category Maintained Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 157 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mary McCrae Headteacher Glen Golding Date of previous school inspection 29–30 September 2011 Telephone number 0118 9812836 Fax number 0118 9817782 Email address adminoffice@bishopswood-inf.hants.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion