Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
James Sage
- Postcode verified
GL14 2AZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,018
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 29 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Tanya Prosser Principal Forest E-ACT Academy Causeway Road Cinderford Gloucestershire GL14 2AZ
p.1
Academy
Following my visit to your school on Thursday 12 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Academy
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Academy
Senior leaders and governors are taking incisive and urgent action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, the Chair and another member of the Governing Body, and a representative of the sponsor to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy improvement plan was evaluated and other documents and the academy’s analysis of data were discussed.
p.1
Context
The report on the recent inspection makes clear that, at the time of the inspection, a number of new approaches had been adopted within the academy, but that these had yet to have the impact expected. Since the start of this academy year, these changes have been applied across the academy and given fresh impetus. The Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com planned extensive changes to the curriculum have been fully implemented. There have been a number of changes to teaching staff, but not in senior leadership.
p.1
Main findings
The principal, senior and middle leaders, and governors are fully aware of the challenge the academy faces to become at least good. They fully recognise the need for the pace of improvement to become more rapid and for the new approaches taken to have a positive impact quickly. Extremely challenging targets and milestones have been set to achieve this as quickly as possible. The academy has introduced an extremely rigorous process for setting challenging targets for all students. Frequent and systematic evaluation of students’ progress is now being used well to carefully plan the help and support needed by individual and groups of students to enable them to achieve these targets. Based on these targets for students, the academy has set extremely challenging, but achievable, targets for the proportions of students achieving and exceeding the expected levels of progress. These targets become more demanding with
p.2
Main findings
each subsequent year group. Many students enter the academy with low levels of literacy, communication and mathematical skills. The wide range of targeted support for these students is constantly reviewed to evaluate its impact and, where necessary, other approaches used. Following our discussions, more attention is to be given to developing mathematical skills in a range of subjects. The sharper focus on raising students’ achievement is balanced well with the high-quality support for their personal development and well-being. There is close integration between academic monitoring and pastoral support systems. Evaluations of the quality of teaching are now more securely based on the evaluation of individual student’s progress and the overall progress made by each teaching group. Improvement is underpinned by a whole-academy ‘what a good one looks like’ approach. This means that: all teachers learn from the best and are clear about
p.2
Main findings
what good and better teaching looks like; best practice in subject and senior leadership is exemplified and shared; and students are shown exemplars of what they are expected to achieve and the standard of work they are expected to produce. A good system has been introduced to ensure that students receive regular, good quality feedback on their work so that they are clear about how to improve. All teachers are expected to follow and implement a set of ‘non-negotiables’ in their planning and teaching, while allowing enough flexibility for the best teachers to be creative. Support and training for teachers is matched well to whole-academy, subject department and individual teacher’s needs. The focus is on ensuring that teachers fully understand the principles behind the improvements in teaching required, and are not just equipped with a set of strategies to follow. The academy has taken extensive actions to improve students’ attendance. This
p.2
Main findings
has had some positive impact, but attendance is still not good enough. Further measures have been introduced and the impact of these will be checked carefully. I agreed with the senior leader responsible for attendance for them to identify and let me know of any factors where external support may be required. Governors are provided with robust information on students’ progress, attendance and the quality of teaching to enable them to ask challenging questions of senior leaders. The governing body has a good balance of skills and expertise and is well-equipped to provide this challenge. They agreed to let me know if they identify any areas where they would value external support.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The academy receives support through its E-ACT education advisor. The principal is very outward looking and has formed good working relationships with other schools, local employers, community organisations and national bodies to ensure that the academy benefits from good practice wherever it can be found. Links with partner primary schools are focused well on raising students’ skills in literacy and numeracy and smoothing progression from Year 6 to Year 7, including setting much higher expectations.
p.3
External support
I agreed with you and the Chair of the Governing Body that where additional or more focused external support is required, you will let me know and I will help to identify schools and/or other partners to provide this.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, E-ACT and the Director of Children’s Services for Gloucestershire and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion