Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Ipswich Academy
Summary
Ian Seath (lead), Brenda Watson, John Ubsdell, Paul Brooker, Rachel Hobson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Jul 2013
- Inspectors verified
Brenda Watson, Ian Seath, John Ubsdell, Paul Brooker, Rachel Hobson
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
IP3 9PZ
- Name on report verified
Ipswich Academy
- URN verified
136453
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Over time, weak teaching has led to pupils making inadequate progress. p.4
- This is a school that has serious weaknesses. p.1
- However, the wider correction of poor spelling, grammar and basic handwriting skills is weak despite recent efforts to monitor these important aspects of learning. p.4
- Teaching is inadequate because students, and in particular the most able, are often not given hard enough work. p.1
- Despite recent evidence of improvement, achievement is inadequate in English and mathematics. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching so that most is at least good by: ensuring that lessons challenge students of all abilities. planning lessons to allow flexibility and opportunities to develop skills of independent learning within all classes. ensuring consistent high quality marking of written work. p.3
- By improving teaching, ensure that all groups of students make progress that is at least in line with national expectations, so that their attainment reaches at least the national average particularly in English and mathematics. p.3
- Improve provision for the most able students by ensuring that they are challenged more in class. p.3
- Students’ behaviour around the school and in class has improved noticeably since the last monitoring visit. p.5
- This is reflected in a downward trend of exclusions, although the overall level is higher than average. p.5
- Poor behaviour in lessons does sometimes disrupt learning, but not when students are interested in what is being taught, or are suitably stimulated by what they are doing. p.5
- Both students and staff indicated to inspectors that the application of the school’s behaviour policy is not consistent between different teachers. p.5
- Incidences of bullying or intolerance are uncommon despite some ‘name-calling’. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment26
“Over time, weak teaching has led to pupils making inadequate progress.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,413
- shorter than usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ipswich Academy Lindbergh Road, Ipswich, IP3 9PZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Inadequate 4 Achievement of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Inadequate 4 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that has serious weaknesses. Teaching is inadequate because students, and in particular the most able, are often not given hard enough work. Checks on teaching carried out by managers do not always detect when the work is not hard enough. As a consequence teaching is not improving quickly enough. Despite recent evidence of improvement, achievement is inadequate in English and mathematics. Most students do not make the progress that they should. Students’ behaviour requires improvement. When lessons are dull, students are not involved in their learning. They misbehave and this gets in the way of them making good progress. The sixth form requires improvement because students have not made the progress that they should relative to their starting point.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The academy has a clear understanding of its weaknesses. Actions to address them are beginning to have a positive impact, particularly at subject leader level. Governance now offers good challenge to the school and to the Principal. Rapid improvements have been made to attendance, behaviour, persistent absence and the number of exclusions. The introduction and use of the compulsory one-to-one tutorial system to encourage and challenge students to achieve better.
p.1
Information about this inspection
This was a two-day inspection carried out with half a day’s notice. It followed a monitoring visit that took place 12 months ago. Inspectors observed 45 lessons or parts of lessons, taught by 42 teachers. Four lessons were observed jointly with academy leaders. A wide range of documentation was scrutinised. This included that relating to governance, school improvement, performance management, exclusions, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors were unable to take account of the online Parent View survey because too few had responded by the end of the inspection. Inspectors evaluated the academy’s own parental survey responses. Inspectors took account of 61 staff questionnaires received. Discussions were held with senior managers, the Principal, middle leaders, students, representative of governors and the academy sponsor, and nominated staff.
p.2
Inspection team
Ian Seath, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Brenda Watson Additional Inspector John Ubsdell Additional Inspector Rachel Hobson Additional Inspector Paul Brooker Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Full report
In accordance with the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.3
Information about this school
The academy is sponsored, together with 3 other academies, by the Learning Schools Trust. The sponsor works with these academies to share effective practice and accelerate school improvement. The academy is located in Ipswich, Suffolk, and has been operational since March 2011. The work is coordinated by the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer. The academy does not meet the government’s floor standard, which sets the minimum expectations for attainment and progress in English and mathematics. The proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium, which is additional government funding is high, almost twice the national average. This funding includes those known to be looked after and/or eligible for free school meals. The proportion of students who have a statement of special educational need, or who are supported by school action or by school action plus, is over twice the national average.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so that most is at least good by: ensuring that lessons challenge students of all abilities. planning lessons to allow flexibility and opportunities to develop skills of independent learning within all classes. ensuring consistent high quality marking of written work.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
By improving teaching, ensure that all groups of students make progress that is at least in line with national expectations, so that their attainment reaches at least the national average particularly in English and mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve provision for the most able students by ensuring that they are challenged more in class.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
ensuring that, through watching teaching, leaders identify and tackle those lessons that are not pitched at a high enough level. devising ways to ensure that students receive intensive literacy and study skills support when they start at the school, so that they quickly become confident learners.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
The proportion of students gaining 5 or more GCSEs at grades A* to C including English and mathematics, was below the minimum expectation set by the government in 2012. The proportion attaining the highest grades A* and A was low. In 2012, in English and mathematics, the progress that most students made was below that expected given their starting points on entry. The gap between the progress made by boys and girls was smaller than the average seen nationally. Students being supported by the pupil premium, which includes those known to be eligible for free schools meals, achieved on average a full GSCE grade lower in English and mathematics than their peers in the academy. Students with special educational needs or disabilities, including those supported by school action and school action plus, made significantly less progress than their peers when compared to students within the academy and nationally.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
Students enter the school in Year 7 with prior attainment that is well below the national average. In particular, literacy skills are weak and this inhibits their learning. Since the 2012 results were published, encouraging indications have emerged of improvements in achievement, particularly in literacy. These are due to improvements within the curriculum and aspects of teaching, partially funded by the use of pupil premium and Year 7 catch-up money. The academy’s own assessments of students’ progress indicate that GCSE results are likely to improve significantly in 2013, particularly for mathematics. Notably, these indications include a narrowing of the gap between the achievement of those eligible for pupil premium funding and their peers in English and mathematics. At Key Stage 3, accurate data show that at Key Stage 3, students’ progress now accelerates. This is most marked in Year 9 in both English and mathematics. In these subjects progress has
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
improved from well below average and is now around that expected nationally. In addition, gaps between the progress made by different groups and their peers are narrowing, including for those eligible for the pupil premium and those with special educational needs or disabilities. The academy is in the process of abandoning early entry for GCSE examinations. Around 30 students have been entered for these examinations for 2013. The academy recognises that early entry has limited the GCSE attainment of some students. In 2012 the academy had a very small sixth form. As a consequence the only examination entries were for AS subjects. The proportion of these students gaining the highest grades was below national average. Academy data indicate improved performance in 2013 for A level examinations, with a substantial increase in the proportion of students attaining the highest grades. The retention of students between Years 12 and 13 is around average. Students speak
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
highly of their sixth form experiences. The sixth form is growing quickly.
p.4
The quality of teaching is inadequate
Over time, weak teaching has led to pupils making inadequate progress. Inspectors observed a significant number of inadequate lessons and lessons that required improvement. These lessons are often pitched at a level that fails to challenge all students. Because of this some students become bored and restless and disrupt the learning of others.
p.4
The quality of teaching is inadequate
Students are slow to develop skills of independent learning, especially when the structure of lessons does not make provision for it. Although they are able to access the academy’s online learning portal at any time, students report that many do not take advantage of this facility. The marking of written work is too variable. Sometimes workbooks go for long periods of time before they are marked, and this leads to a lack of pride in their presentation. Good examples of marking exist, often in English. However, the wider correction of poor spelling, grammar and basic handwriting skills is weak despite recent efforts to monitor these important aspects of learning.
p.4
The quality of teaching is inadequate
The assessment of students’ attainment and progress is now systematic and accurate, following the implementation of the curriculum model of the academy sponsors. The results of this assessment are not yet consistently used to challenge all students in lessons, but they are used well in the academy’s one-to-one compulsory tutorial system. Inspectors observed examples of good challenge being made to students as well as encouragement to aim for higher levels of achievement. This system is recently introduced so it has not yet had time to impact fully. However, it is currently compensating for weaker teaching, enabling students to achieve better than they did at the time of the last monitoring inspection 12 months ago.
p.5
The quality of teaching is inadequate
In the core of good lessons seen, teachers plan flexibly, allowing for independent work that challenges students of all abilities. Behaviour is good because students are interested. The marking of written work in these classes is detailed, clearly outlining how work can be improved. Occasionally class time is devoted to correcting mistakes. Students develop skills of independent learning and confidence quickly in these circumstances.
p.5
The quality of teaching is inadequate
Sixth form students talk positively about their experiences of sixth form teaching. The school’s view that teaching in sixth form is good was supported by the small number of lesson observations that inspectors undertook in Year 12 classes. These lessons were well taught, offering good challenge to the students.
p.5
The quality of teaching is inadequate
Teaching assistants work effectively in class. They have an important role in literacy support, an area that the school has rightly prioritised. The school can demonstrate that students with weaker literacy skills, including those with special educational needs or disabilities, are now making progress that is currently adequate and, for some, good. This represents an improvement since the last monitoring visit 12 months ago.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Students’ behaviour around the school and in class has improved noticeably since the last monitoring visit. This is reflected in a downward trend of exclusions, although the overall level is higher than average.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Poor behaviour in lessons does sometimes disrupt learning, but not when students are interested in what is being taught, or are suitably stimulated by what they are doing. Both students and staff indicated to inspectors that the application of the school’s behaviour policy is not consistent between different teachers.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Incidences of bullying or intolerance are uncommon despite some ‘name-calling’. Students know who to approach if they are affected, and say that they feel safe in the school. Only a very few parents responded to the online Parent View survey. However, the academy’s own surveys indicate that parents share this view.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Attendance and punctuality have improved as a result of academy systems introduced since the last monitoring visit. Attendance is now just below average, having reduced from unacceptably high levels a year ago. The rate of persistent absence has reduced markedly from exceptionally high levels. This is still above average. Several strategies introduced to tackle the problem, notably the use of attendance panels, fixed penalty notices, and improved liaison with families affected are proving effective. Attendance and persistent absence targets are a feature of the academy’s performance management of teachers.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Since the last monitoring visit a new deputy principal and several middle leaders have joined the academy. Together with the Principal and significant support from the academy sponsors and governors, they are quickly building a momentum for improvement. This is beginning to impact positively on teaching, learning and achievement. In addition, improvements in behaviour and attendance are clear. All of these improvements are from a very low base however, with some way to go before attainment reaches national averages.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders have a realistic view of the weaknesses of the academy. Weaknesses and strengths are well-defined and accurate. Priorities for improvement rightly concentrate on the improvement of teaching and learning. At subject level, middle leaders have a similarly accurate view of their areas. Action plans have precise targets that are easily monitored. Some of these are very recent however, and have yet to impact on performance.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The observation of lessons by managers is now systematic and well-established. However, it sometimes grades lessons too generously. This is because the documentation used has a focus on teacher activities rather than students’ learning. Consequently, when teachers are teaching at too low a level it is not always recognised and tackled. The systematic identification and sharing of best teaching practice is quickly being established by middle leaders.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders are now able to use the results of assessments to gain an accurate view of how well the academy is performing, and how well individual groups are progressing. These data are used to set targets for individual’s performance management. Teachers’ progression through the pay spine is now linked to the meeting of these targets.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The academy makes sensible and effective use of pupil premium funding. Together with that provided for Year 7 catch up this is used to pay for staff to identify and provide support for those in need of early intervention. In addition, funding is used for family and community support staff. This has helped to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence significantly.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The curriculum has sufficient breadth to provide for the needs of the majority of students, including a small number who undertake on-site vocational courses. The curriculum for English and literacy is strengthening through the introduction of additional support for those who need it. However, the curriculum for the most able does not allow these students to achieve to the best of their ability. A majority of students value one-to-one tutorials, and feel that they give good guidance to achieve better.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The promotion of students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is well-developed in the sixth-form but not elsewhere. Assemblies do promote relevant issues and students increasingly take on responsibilities, for example, through the student council. The curriculum does offer opportunities to develop moral and other issues, for example, through overseas visits and through topics such as the holocaust and world wars. However, these opportunities are not systematically exploited in class. The one-to-one tutorial system is helping students to raise their own expectations. Senior leaders check the progress of different group of students regularly and frequently, and these evaluations are accurate. Gaps in the performance of groups do exist and are significant, but in most cases there is clear evidence that the gaps are narrowing as a result of the steps taken by the academy. For this reason the impact of the academy’s sponsor on improvement is
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The academy has a number of strategies to involve parents and carers in school life and to improve communications. For example, they are invited to meet tutors termly to discuss students’ progress. A parent council group has been established, together with weekly drop-in sessions with the family liaison officer.
p.7
The leadership and management requires improvement
The governance of the school: Governors have offered good support to the academy during a period of many changes. They are realistic about the weaknesses of the academy and now have an understanding of its performance data so that they are less dependent on analyses provided by senior leaders. Governors understand where the least effective teaching is, but are less clear about why this is the case. Their performance management of the Principal is sound. They offer robust challenge to the academy and have been closely involved in the development of the academy’s good action plan. Governors have ensured that funding received through the pupil premium is utilised to the benefit of those that are disadvantaged. Governors have ensured that the academy meets statutory requirements regarding safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 136453 Local authority Suffolk Inspection number 399831
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Academy sponsor-led School category Foundation Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 903 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 80 Appropriate authority The Board of the Learning Schools Trust Chair John Helleur Principal Nancy Robinson Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01473 729222 Fax number 01473 718627 Email address nancy.robinson@ipswichacademy.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion