Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Peckham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Peckham

  • Postcode verified

    NG23 6JP

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisecleareffectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
613
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Wendy Ramshaw Norwell CofE Primary School School Lane Norwell Newark NG23 6JP

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 11 September 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school.

p.1

Primary School

This visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under Section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking incisive and urgent action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that it is clear exactly who will evaluate the actions in the school development plan and how they will do it, so that the governing body is clear about what sort of monitoring information should come to them at each meeting

p.1

Primary School

 make arrangements to plan for setting up formal links between Norwell School and St Matthew’s School to follow the appointment of a new executive headteacher

p.1

Primary School

 re-evaluate the curriculum, particularly the time allocated to swimming, and the organisation of classes to ensure that resources are being used most effectively for the overall needs of all pupils.

p.1

Evidence

Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct Tel 0121 6799169 Direct email :mathew.mitchell@serco.com During the visit I met with the headteacher and another senior leader, members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a group of pupils to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I toured the school site and classrooms and evaluated the school improvement plan. I also discussed with the headteacher, the impact of the new marking policy, aspects of the school’s approach to the performance management of staff, monitoring the progress of pupils and how this was communicated to them and to their parents.

p.1

Context

The present executive headteacher has decided to retire at the end of the Spring term in 2014. The governing body of Norwell School has created a joint committee with the governing body from St Matthew’s School to begin the process of recruiting a replacement.

p.2

Main findings

As indicated in the June inspection report, many actions designed to address issues identified by the inspector had already been started. Because of this, despite the relatively short period between the inspection in June and the start of the Autumn term, there is now a new marking policy and a real focus on a series of non- negotiable elements for pupils to include in their writing for all subjects. The governing body has been closely involved in the re-shaping of the school development plan, which addresses all the areas for improvement identified in the inspection report. A new calculation policy is now in place, but it is too early to be able to evaluate its impact.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school has used external support well, including additional time from the local authority school improvement adviser, networks within the local Tuxford family of schools and the support from a local leader in education arranged by the local authority. The headteacher is actively seeking further opportunities to work collaboratively with other small rural schools in similar situations.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire and the Nottingham Diocese.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion