Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Ethelbert's RC Primary School

Inspected 17 Jul 2013 · published 17 Sept 2013 · URN 105222

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Gillian Hunter (lead), Susan Barkway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jul 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Gillian Hunter, Susan Barkway

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BL3 5RL

  • Name on report verified

    St Ethelbert's RC Primary School

  • URN verified

    105222

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectiveoutstandinggood progresspositivestrongeffectivelyhighly effective
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementinadequateweaknessesweakernot yetinsufficientlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings427w+68
  • What needs to improve1878w−2

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,225
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%What needs to improve 62%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

St Ethelbert's RC Primary School Melbourne Road, Deane, Bolton, Lancashire, BL3 5RL

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Pupils' progress is inconsistent between classes. Attainment in mathematics has dipped and is below average.  Not enough teaching is good and better. Improvements in teaching are not consistent throughout the school. Teachers do not always encourage independent learning and make certain that more-able pupils achieve as well as they can.  Teachers’ subject knowledge in mathematics is variable and the school lacks a clear plan to ensure skills are taught in the correct sequence.  School leaders do not monitor teaching and pupils’ progress precisely enough to ensure that weaker aspects are addressed quickly. Teachers’s targets do not always have a sharp focus on the progress pupils make.  Leadership and management do not ensure the school moves forward fast enough because plans for development do not identify clear targets closely linked to accelerating pupils’ progress.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress, as do disabled pupils and those with special educational needs.  The teaching of letters and sounds is good and is helping pupils improve their reading and writing.  Achievement in writing has improved throughout the school since the last inspection and is now in line with the national average.  The school is friendly and welcoming. Pupils have positive attitudes to their learning and behave well in lessons and around school. They feel safe in school.  All school leaders, governors and staff provide a strong, caring ethos in the school and pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning in all classes and saw 15 lessons, especially in English and mathematics. Two of the lessons were observed jointly with the headteacher. In addition, the inspectors listened to pupils read and observed teaching assistants working with pupils.  Discussions were held with pupils in lessons and their work was discussed with them.  Meetings and discussions were held with senior and middle leaders, four representatives of the governing body, teaching and classroom support staff, pupils and two representatives of the local authority.  Pupils’ work was scrutinised in English, mathematics and a range of other subjects.  A wide range of documentation was reviewed, including national assessment data, the school’s own data, monitoring records of the quality of teaching and the progress of pupils, the school’s view of its own performance and the school development plan. In addition, the minutes of the

p.2

Information about this inspection

governing body meetings, safeguarding documentation and external reports from the local authority were reviewed.  Eighteen responses from parents to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) were taken into account as well as the views from 17 staff questionnaires.

p.2

Inspection team

Gillian Hunter, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Susan Barkway Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is an average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils supported through school action is lower than the national average.  Pupils supported by school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs is lower than average.  The number of pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium is higher than the national average. The pupil premium is funding to support pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families and children who are looked after by the local authority.  The number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds or who speak English as an additional language is close to the national average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the overall quality of teaching to increase the rates of pupils’ progress, particularly in mathematics by:  ensuring that teachers plan and provide challenge for all abilities especially more-able pupils  developing more independent learning across all subjects.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve attainment and progress in mathematics throughout the school by:  improving teachers’ subject knowledge  putting a plan in place that makes sure mathematical skills are taught in the correct sequence so that one skill builds on another  developing pupils’ competency and confidence in the basic skills of numeracy  ensuring that teachers provide increasingly complex problems for pupils to solve using their numeracy skills.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by:  leaders consistently evaluating and using the information from all monitoring activities to promote improvements in the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress  ensuring that teachers’ targets have a sharp focus on the impact of their teaching on the progress pupils make  ensuring that the school development plan sets out precisely the steps that need to be taken to raise attainment and achieve the school’s and pupils’ challenging targets.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Test results show that attainment at the end of Year 6 has fallen to below average in mathematics and reading and is broadly average in writing. Although there are pockets of good progress especially in the Early Years Foundation Stage, overall achievement requires improvement.  The more able pupils do not always make enough progress, especially in reading and mathematics. This means that the promotion of equality of opportunity is not yet fully effective.  In mathematics, there are inconsistencies and although work in books shows good progress in basic written methods of calculating in number, there are not enough opportunities for pupils to use and apply their learning across different aspects of mathematics and investigate real-life problems independently.  Children enter the school with skills and knowledge that are very low for their age, especially in communication and language development. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children learn

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

quickly and make good progress in communication, including early reading and writing skills and this gives them a secure base for their future learning.  Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 is good in reading because the teaching of phonics is effective and pupils use these skills well to tackle new words. Since the last inspection, standards in writing have improved steadily and by Year 6 are broadly average overall. However, not enough pupils are making good progress in reading and writing to ensure they achieve at the highest levels.  Lesson observations and samples of pupils’ work confirm that disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress as a result of effective and well targeted support. The small number of pupils who are at early stages of speaking English make good progress.  Pupils eligible for the pupil premium make similar progress to others, although this varies with

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

the different ability in each cohort. This includes those pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. The gap between pupils known to be entitled to free school meals and other pupils is narrower than nationally in reading and writing, but wider in mathematics. Attainment in English is broadly in line with the national average and in mathematics it is below.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching varies across years and subjects. This leads to inconsistency in pupils’ progress especially in mathematics.  Where teaching requires improvement, teachers’ expectations are not high enough and as a result pupils, especially the more able, are too often involved in learning that is too easy for them. In some classes, pupils do not do as well as they should and have limited opportunities to work independently.  Whilst mathematics teaching is good and improving in Years 5 and 6, the amount of good and outstanding teaching throughout the school is insufficient to accelerate pupils’ progress. Teachers’ subject knowledge varies and they lack the guidance needed to ensure that skills are taught in the correct sequence. There are insufficient opportunities for pupils to apply their learning or to develop their basic calculation skills efficiently and as a result, they sometimes

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

struggle to reach an answer quickly.  Training and support for all teaching staff has been effective in raising pupils’ attainment in writing. This is because the school has provided teachers and pupils with many opportunities to improve how writing is taught. The teaching of reading is improving, with the stronger teaching of letters and sounds (phonics). Not enough attention is given to aspects of writing that will enable pupils to reach the higher levels. Teaching staff have not received the same level of training and support in mathematics and, therefore, their subject knowledge is not sufficient to provide teaching and learning opportunities that will enable all pupils to make rapid progress.  In the effective lessons, teachers involve pupils from the start in contributing to and participating in lively and motivating activities. Teachers often set a brisk pace and respond well to pupils’ learning needs by adapting and reshaping tasks. They make regular use of information and

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

communication technology to boost pupils’ learning. For example, pupils in Year 6 were investigating the difference in temperatures throughout the world and used iPads well to find the information quickly on the internet. They were able to find the mean and range of the temperatures efficiently before representing their findings in graphical form.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage, teaching is good and activities are planned carefully to promote children’s enthusiasm and interest in learning. There is a wide range of well resourced activities that they select for themselves, particularly for early reading and writing. Skills are introduced systematically through rhymes, songs and games. The use of the outdoors to promote learning in all areas is good.  The support for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is good. Teaching assistants provide skilled support for pupils in lessons and in small group activities. Support for

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

those for whom the school receives pupil premium funding is good in reading and writing, but is less effective in mathematics.  Teachers mark work and provide regular positive feedback to pupils. This was seen most effectively in Year 6. However, marking is more precise in writing than in mathematics.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 All pupils are welcomed and they get on well together. Behaviour is good in classrooms and around school. The school is calm and orderly, and relationships between pupils and adults are good.  All pupils are well integrated into lessons, including those from different backgrounds and those who find it more difficult to sustain good behaviour. Any behavioural concerns are managed well so that misbehaviour rarely affects the learning of others. On a few occasions, when work is not matched carefully enough to pupils’ needs, they lose concentration, limiting their progress.  Pupils treat each other with respect and consideration. They take good care of each other, especially in the playground. The school works closely with parents in ensuring that pupils are punctual. Attendance is at least average.  Pupils have a good understanding of different types of bullying and feel that there is very little in

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

school. They recognise concerns regarding internet safety and are confident that there are numerous adults to talk to if they have any worries. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe.  Pupils respond well to the strong spiritual, moral, social cultural support and guidance they receive. They develop positive attitudes to life and take responsibility and contribute to a safe environment. An example of this is the use of nominated pupils who act as guardian angels to support any unhappy pupils in the school.  Most parents spoken to during the inspection and through responses to the online questionnaire indicated they believe that behaviour is good. Several spoke with pleasure about how their children’s additional needs are well supported.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The headteacher, senior leaders and governors share a determination that the school will continue to improve. The school is working closely with external support and the local authority and this has led to a clearer focus on areas to improve. This is demonstrating a secure capacity to improve.  The school’s analysis of its own performance has identified that the school requires further improvement. Priorities are accurate but actions in the school’s improvement plan are not precise, measurable and challenging enough. As a result, senior leaders and the governing body are not able to ensure all aspects of teaching and learning improve strongly.  The tracking of pupils’ progress is variable but improving, so that staff are becoming clearer about where improvement is needed in order to raise pupils’ attainment. Information gained from this tracking is being used more effectively, although more needs to be done to ensure the

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

more able pupils make enough progress.  The checks made on teaching and learning are comprehensive but have not always identified shortcomings precisely enough. This has held back the pace of improvement in teaching and weaker aspects remain, especially in mathematics. Subject leaders have few opportunities to check on teaching and learning in classrooms in the subjects for which they hold responsibility.  Training to raise pupils’ attainment in English has been effective. This is not yet the case in mathematics and a lack of planned access to specialised training and support for all staff has resulted in limited improvements in the teaching of mathematics.  Teachers have targets to improve their performance but these have not always been sharply focused on the impact that teaching has on pupils’ progress.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted effectively and pupils’ efforts

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

are clearly valued and there are many opportunities for pupils to work together. The school tackles any issues of discrimination well and this contributes to the harmony in the community.  Parents are pleased with the care their children receive. The headteacher and staff are passionate about ensuring pupils enjoy their learning and feel safe. Procedures to ensure pupils’ safety meet requirements.  The governance of the school:  The governing body has had a range of training and now has a much clearer view of the strengths and weaknesses of the school.  Governors are nominated to oversee subjects and to review data to gain first-hand information on teaching and the progress pupils make. They have played a part in challenging the decline in mathematics and in calling in support.  Governors are now stronger at holding the school to account for the standards achieved since the last inspection. They are aware of the quality of teaching and check that staff, including

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

the headteacher, meet their targets before increases in salaries are awarded.  Governors ensure budgeting procedures comply with best practice and that the pupil premium benefits those pupils eligible for such funding.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 105222 Local authority Bolton Inspection number 413039

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 248 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Tom Grady Headteacher Mandy Messham Date of previous school inspection 12 July 2010 Telephone number 01204 333036 Fax number 01204 333037 Email address seniorj@st-ethelberts.bolton.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion