Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Ernulf Academy

Inspected 27 Jun 2013 · published 12 Sept 2013 · URN 137187

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jun 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Paul Bartlett, Paul O'Shea, Richard Sutton, Rosemarie McCarthy

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    PE19 2SH

  • Name on report verified

    Ernulf Academy

  • URN verified

    137187

Page 4 of 10
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovingmake good progresspositiveimprovedeffectivegood progresshighly effective
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysnot consistentlyrequires improvementseriousweaknessestoo manyvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings743w−37
  • What needs to improve1508w+4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,169
shorter than usual (typical 3203)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 46
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Ernulf Academy Barford Road, Eynesbury, St Neots, PE19 2SH

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Inadequate 4 Achievement of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that has serious weaknesses.  The proportion of students who achieved five A* to C grades, including English and mathematics, at the end of Year 11 in 2012 was significantly below average.  The proportion achieving A* to C grades in mathematics was particularly low, and too few Year 11 students made the progress expected nationally in either English or mathematics.  Teaching is not always matched closely enough to the skills and abilities of all students.  Teachers’ marking does not have as much impact on achievement as it should.  Some teachers spend too long providing introductions and explanations in lessons, so valuable learning time is lost.  Some teachers do not ask probing questions effectively in lessons to develop students’ understanding.  The academy’s improvement plan does not clearly indicate how the actions taken will help to improve teaching and achievement.  During the academy’s first year, leaders and

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

managers were not successful in tackling underachievement, particularly in GCSE mathematics.  The quality of subject leadership is not consistently good.  Governors do not influence improvements in teaching and achievement as well as they should.  The sixth form requires improvement because the quality of teaching since the academy opened has not been consistently good.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Teaching and achievement are improving, because leaders and managers are working more effectively than they did during the academy’s first year.  Students who benefit from the ‘Opening Minds’ curriculum make good progress in reading.  Students are polite, courteous and well mannered. Relationships across the whole academy are positive, and students feel safe.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 41 lessons, eight of which were jointly observed with senior leaders. The inspection team also made several short visits to other lessons to check on the progress and behaviour of different groups of students.  Meetings were held with four groups of students from Key Stages 3 and 4 and the sixth form. Other meetings were held with governors, senior leaders and staff, including those responsible for leading subjects.  Inspectors analysed 37 responses to the online parent questionnaire (Parent View) during the inspection, as well as responses to questionnaires from 67 staff.  Inspectors observed the work of the academy and looked at a number of documents, including those relating to the monitoring of teaching and the targets set for teachers to improve their work. They also looked at records relating to attendance, behaviour, bullying and safeguarding, the academy’s improvement plan and data on students’ progress.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 Due to the timing of the inspection it was not possible for inspectors to observe Year 11 or Year 13 classes.

p.2

Inspection team

Richard Sutton, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Rosemarie McCarthy Additional Inspector Paul Bartlett Additional Inspector Paul O'Shea Additional Inspector

p.2

Full report

In accordance with the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.3

Information about this school

 Ernulf Academy converted to academy status in August 2011. When the predecessor school, St Neots Community College, was last inspected by Ofsted in March 2011, it was judged to be satisfactory.  The academy is smaller than the average secondary school with a sixth form.  The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is slightly below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  A tenth of the students are from minority ethnic heritages, which is lower than average.  The proportion of students who speak English as an additional language is below average.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium, which is additional funding given to schools for students in local authority care, those known to be eligible for free school meals and students from service families, is average.

p.3

Information about this school

 A small number of students attend alternative provision in Years 10 and 11. They study courses in farming at the College of West Anglia and engineering at ‘Peterborough Alternative Curriculum Education (ACE)’.  The academy is part of a multi-academy trust and works closely with a nearby partner academy in the trust.  As part of the St Neots Learning Partnership Academy Trust, the academy supports some students through ‘Prospect House’ which ensures that students who may be at risk of exclusion remain taught by specialist teachers.  A nursery shares the academy site, but it is subject to separate inspection and reporting arrangements.  The academy does not meet the government’s current floor standard, which sets the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching and students’ achievement, particularly in mathematics, in the main school and the sixth form by making sure that:  work in lessons is always well matched to the different skills and abilities of all students  students’ work is marked regularly, with targets to help improve the work that are checked by teachers to make sure students respond to the advice given  teachers spend less time providing introductions and explanations, so students can work more on their own  teachers use different types of questions more effectively to help students of different abilities to develop their understanding.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by:  reviewing the priorities in the academy’s improvement plan, so they can be clearly monitored against their impact on the quality of teaching and achievement at key points throughout the year  developing the skills of those responsible for leading subjects so that teaching and achievement in all subjects are consistently and accurately monitored  devising a system for all teachers and leaders to share good practice in a coordinated way.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Make sure the governing body is better able to influence improvements in teaching and achievement by:  providing governors with regular, more detailed information about the quality of teaching and achievement  regularly and thoroughly checking this information at governing body meetings against the objectives in the academy improvement plan.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 The academy’s first set of GCSE examination results, achieved in 2012, were too low. Students had joined the academy with attainment that was significantly below average, but did not make enough progress and the proportion achieving five A* to C grades, including English and mathematics, was much lower than it should have been.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Achievement in mathematics was inadequate in 2012. Only a small proportion of students achieved A* to C grades and far too many students did not make enough progress. The reason for this underachievement was that too many students did not benefit from consistently good teaching in Year 11.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Achievement in English was better than in mathematics, and an average proportion of students achieved A* to C grades. However, not enough made the progress expected nationally.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Achievement is improving because leaders and managers are having a much better impact on improving teaching than they had during the first year of the academy. However, the quality of teaching still varies too much to support good achievement across all year groups and subjects. Achievement in mathematics, although improving, remains inadequate in Year 11.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Almost all groups of students are making similar progress, including disabled students and those who have special educational needs, those who speak English as an additional language and students from ethnic minority heritages.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 The small number of students who attend the off-site farming and engineering courses achieve well and make good progress.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Some students are supported through additional Year 7 catch-up funding, which helps students who join with attainment below the expected levels in English and mathematics. The academy uses this funding to provide one-to-one and small group tuition in English and mathematics. Students who are eligible are making variable progress, but it is good in reading.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 The academy spends its pupil premium funding on additional staff to give students one-to-one support, and a wide and varied range of educational trips and activities. Students who are eligible for support are beginning to make better progress than they have in previous years because leaders and managers are developing an effective strategy for monitoring their progress. In 2012, eligible students achieved, on average, almost a grade lower than other students in GCSE English and two-thirds of a grade lower in mathematics.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Students in the sixth form made the progress that was expected of them in 2012. Some in this phase achieved well in 2012, particularly in mathematics. However, not enough sixth form students have made good progress since the academy opened because teaching has not been consistently good, though it is now improving.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Since the academy opened, teaching has not been good enough to help all students across all year groups and subjects to make good progress. Some inadequate teaching in its first year left students with ground to make up. The quality of teaching is improving, particularly since September 2012, but still not enough is consistently good or better. As a result, achievement is improving, but not as rapidly as it needs to.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teaching in mathematics has been inadequate. It is now improving and students’ progress in this subject is beginning to improve. However, it is too early to see the full impact on achievement.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 More teachers are now ensuring that learning is better matched to the different skills and abilities of individual students, but this is not consistent across all subjects and year groups.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers do not always make sure that students’ work is marked regularly. They make variable use of targets to help students improve, and when targets are set teachers do not regularly check that students have acted on the advice given.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers sometimes take up too much time in lessons providing explanations and introductions. This results in lost learning time, and often students become passive and lose concentration.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers do not always use different types of questions as well as they should to help students develop their thinking and understanding at their own level.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Where teaching is good or outstanding, learning typically progresses quickly. Teachers plan a variety of activities that are challenging but pitched at the right level of difficulty so that all students can demonstrate success.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The ‘Opening Minds’ lessons in Year 7 are well taught because teachers are appropriately focused on helping students to improve their literacy skills. As a result many are making good progress, particularly in reading.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 In the sixth-form lessons where teaching is good, teachers use their knowledge of examination criteria well to help students focus clearly on what they need to do to show success.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Some students do not always show good attitudes to learning, and they become passive in some lessons. This is usually a result of teaching which is not as good as it should be, but also because some students are not as motivated to succeed as others.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Most students behave appropriately in lessons and around the academy at break and lunch-time. Students told inspectors that behaviour is not always good, and a few of the responses to the staff questionnaire confirmed this.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Students have a good understanding of bullying and the various forms it can take. Records show that bullying is infrequent at the academy, although a few students told inspectors that in their view it occurs more often than staff are aware of.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Students understand issues relating to safety, and they overwhelmingly feel safe at the academy. They gave inspectors many examples of activities the academy has provided to help them understand a wide range of safety issues, such as keeping safe when using computers.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 The vast majority of students are polite, courteous and well mannered. This helps to ensure that relationships across the whole academy are predominantly positive.  The academy is rightly focused on continuing to improve attendance. Rates of attendance have improved during the second year since the academy opened, but remain below average.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 During the academy’s first year, the efforts of leaders and managers to improve teaching and achievement had little impact. Consequently, the Year 11 group who left the academy in 2012 underachieved significantly. Leaders and managers are now having a greater impact on achievement and teaching and this is why they are beginning to improve, although there still remain too many inconsistencies.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Senior leaders are increasingly focused on ensuring that the work of all leaders and managers has a clear impact on the quality of teaching and students’ progress. The positive impact of this approach is seen in the better progress, overall, across the academy.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 All leaders monitor teaching and achievement regularly, and the results are used to provide focused support and development for teachers where this is necessary. However, there are wide inconsistencies in the quality and accuracy of monitoring by those responsible for subjects. This is why the quality of teaching and achievement are still too variable.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The academy’s improvement plan is not detailed enough, and it lacks specific information about how strategies will be evaluated for their impact on teaching and achievement at various points throughout the academic year. This is another key reason why achievement has not improved at a consistently fast rate.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The targets set for teachers to support them in improving their work are appropriately linked to students’ achievement. Consequently, the proportion of teachers who have moved up the pay scale in the past two years is appropriate.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Since September 2012, leaders have provided a wide range of training and development for some teachers and this is beginning to have a positive impact their practice and on students’ achievement. However, not all teachers have had access to effective training opportunities as there is no systematic and structured approach to the sharing of good practice.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The governance of the school:  The governing body has not monitored teaching and achievement as well as it should have done since the academy opened. It has not ensured that it receives appropriately frequent and detailed information about the quality of teaching and students’ achievement. Consequently, it has not provided enough challenge, and this also contributed to low standards in 2012.  The quality of support and challenge has improved in line with other aspects of leadership and management since September 2012. The governors now have a secure understanding of the academy’s strengths and key areas for improvement, but still not in sufficient detail to enable them to provide the rigorous challenge needed.  The governors have a good understanding of how targets are set for teachers, and how these relate to staff pay rises and promotion. They also know how the pupil premium is spent, and are aware of the impact that this funding is having for eligible students.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The governing body makes sure that the academy fulfils its responsibilities regarding safeguarding. All staff have been checked as required, and are trained appropriately to keep students safe and free from harm.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 137187 Local authority Cambridgeshire Inspection number 400166

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 820 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 96 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Tony Hyde Headteacher Scott Preston Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01480 374748 Fax number 01480 375469 Email address enquiries@ernulf.cambs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion