Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Daniell
- Postcode verified
CB7 5AA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 722
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Dr Carin Taylor Principal Soham Village College Sand Street Soham Ely CB7 5AA
p.1
College
Following my visit to your school on 18 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
College
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, students in Years 7 to 10, members of the governing body and representatives of the Trust to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. You accompanied me on brief visits to a small number of lessons in which I looked at students’ books. I also scrutinised evidence you kindly provided to demonstrate the actions you have taken since the last inspection.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, you have appointed an acting head of English. You have re-defined a strategic role within the senior leadership team to oversee the quality of teaching in the school. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 6799169 Direct email :mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
Your school improvement plan covers all of the areas for improvement identified in the last inspection, and you have identified members of the governing body to monitor each area of improvement.
p.2
Main findings
Your appointment of a temporary head of English is improving teaching in this subject. She is working well with colleagues from Bottisham Village College to improve the accuracy of assessment. The director of mathematics is improving the quality of teaching by providing additional support where he identifies teaching as less than good. Students’ books in English show more detailed marking and suggestions on how to improve their work, but this is not consistent across all subjects.
p.2
Main findings
You rightly realised that your assessments of the quality of teaching in the school were based on too little evidence, and have now expanded your monitoring activities to include more frequent visits to lessons, closer scrutiny of students’ work and discussions with students about the progress they are making. You are improving the quality of teaching by providing appropriate training and support.
p.2
Main findings
Members of the governing body now have an improved understanding of information on students’ progress, and use this to identify whether standards are improving. They have responded swiftly to the last inspection by identifying the need to link a governor to the area of teaching and learning, and by linking a more suitably qualified governor to the English faculty. Visits to faculties result in a written report with points for further action. Governors have already scheduled an external review of governance for the end of September 2013.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
Ensure the best practice in marking becomes consistent across all subjects. Clarify the difference in roles to be played by the Trust and the local governing body in securing rapid school improvement.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The Staploe Education Trust acknowledges that little action has been taken since the last inspection in the form of external support at Trust level. It is not yet clear how support is to be offered at Trust level, although support and challenge at local governance level is becoming more effective. The school has worked well with other schools through its teaching alliance links to develop skills in leadership and management, improve assessment procedures and develop the quality of teaching. It has also used the local authority’s Head of Secondary School Improvement on a consultancy basis to scrutinise the action plan and to lead the review on governance.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion