Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Christina McIntosh
- Postcode verified
PR8 3RS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 945
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Sandie Lineton The Headteacher Kings Meadow Primary School and Early Years Education Centre Meadow Lane Ainsdale Southport Merseyside PR8 3RS
p.1
Primary School and Early Years Education Centre
Following the visit to your school on 15 July, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School and Early Years Education Centre
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you, other school leaders, pupils, the Chair and Vice- Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school development plans. You and I visited each classroom to meet pupils and staff and look at the changes you have made to the school environment, for example the new safety fencing and the plans for an improved outdoor area to encourage learning. I looked at the school’s self-evaluation report for this year; curriculum action plans for next year; the reports from the local authority and lesson observations completed since the last inspection. Your monitoring records showed evidence of improved teaching of mathematics and literacy. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Evidence
www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gail.hill@cfbt.com
p.1
Main findings
You, the governors and staff have responded well to the judgement of the previous inspection and are determined to continue to work together to ensure the school is good. The development plan focuses clearly on the areas for improvement identified in the recent inspection. However, the plan lacks clarity in places and could be modified to prioritise actions and state how the impact of these will be evaluated to ensure progress for pupils is maintained.
p.2
Main findings
You are determined to strengthen the quality of teaching and your focus on mathematics across the school has already shown impact on the pupils’ progress. The pupils recognise their progress and said they find the subject more interesting. New resources for improving mathematics are being used and middle and high ability pupils are more suitably challenged and motivated. Mathematics is also taught through other subjects, for example during ‘Money skills week’ pupils did food tasting to compare brand prices. The results for Year 6 pupils show girls are more in line with boys. The school has worked effectively to raise the challenge for girls to narrow the gaps in learning between them and the boys. Literacy targets are more challenging, linked within topic work, and assessed on a weekly basis. Staff share knowledge and skills and have received useful training during a ‘literacy surgery’ provided by a local authority intervention officer.
p.2
Main findings
You have introduced better processes to track and measure the impact of extra support for pupils: as a result staff are able to share information about progress and challenge pupils to reach their potential. The revised marking policy helps pupils to understand how they can improve their work. Pupils in years 5 and 6 can identify their level of progress and say they are being challenged more in lessons. They say that they enjoy learning and know their targets. Pupils think that the school is getting better and are motivated to make good progress.
p.2
Main findings
Staff think the professional development they have received has been useful and are determined to improve the quality of teaching. Training and visits to other schools have enabled staff to highlight where they will make changes to their teaching next term: for example introducing phonics work earlier to children and improving their monitoring of pupil progress. Performance management systems are now firmly in place and an audit of staff skills has enabled you to pinpoint appropriate development needs. You have increased the leadership opportunities for your staff and they are enthusiastic about the direction the school is taking. They appreciate the level of responsibility they are given and feel empowered to drive the school forward.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has produced an appropriate action plan to formalise its structure and procedures following an external review of governance and is committed to supporting and challenging the school leadership team. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
review the school development plan to ensure that it has a clearer focus and allows the staff taking responsibility for new areas of work to give a termly progress report strengthen the way in which governors monitor the performance of the school.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
You are making good use of the support provided by the local authority prior to, and following, the recent inspection. The local authority provides good links with other schools and offers specific advice to help you improve teaching and learning; improve management skills and also support the governing body. Further leadership training is planned for the middle leaders next term and support has also been given to ensure you are fully staffed next year. Your school improvement advisor has confidence in the school improving quickly.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Sefton and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion