Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Hewitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Hewitt

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationseffectiveimprovinghigh qualitystrongeffectivelyconfidentlyimproved
Criticismnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
806
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Joanne Eagleton (Executive Headteacher) Headteacher Ecclesfield Primary School High Street Ecclesfield Sheffield South Yorkshire S35 9UD

p.1

Dear Mrs Eagleton (Executive Headteacher)

p.1

School, Sheffield

Following my visit to your school on 15 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Sheffield

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the deputy headteacher, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement and action plans. I looked at the written feedback leaders give to teachers after a lesson observation or coaching session. We toured the school with the deputy headteacher and made a series of brief lesson visits.

p.1

Context

Two class teachers are leaving the school at the end of this term. Four teachers, including three newly qualified teachers, are due to join the school in September.

p.1

Main findings

You have maintained a sharp focus on improving the school rapidly. Other leaders and governors are supporting this work effectively and mirroring your high expectations. Leaders and teachers have responded swiftly to the areas requiring improvement at the last inspection. For example, pupils can now explain confidently what they need to do to improve their work. This is because teachers now routinely point out what pupils are doing well and adding ‘a wish’ to explain the next steps they should take to make the work even better. Most teachers give their pupils time to think about these improvements before they start the next piece of work but this is not consistent.

p.1

Main findings

You and the deputy headteacher have wasted no time in raising teachers’ awareness of how more able pupils can be stretched. Teachers have improved their planning to identify how they will meet the needs of groups of pupils of different abilities. However, they are not making best use of pupils’ good behaviour by giving them regular opportunities to work in groups to solve hard problems for themselves.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders are developing their evaluative skills through a detailed plan of support and training. They are regularly involved in checking on the quality of pupils’ work and on the quality of teaching. Senior leaders have made sure middle leaders are learning how to spot exactly what teachers need to do to improve their work. The written feedback teachers get following lesson observations or a coaching session is of high quality because it clearly links the impact teaching is having on learning.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s improvement and action planning is focussed on the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. You have made sure this is refined regularly so that it remains current and useful. Leaders and governors have clear ‘milestones’ to refer to when they check on how well the school is doing. Pupils also have a part to play in evaluating the quality of the school’s work. Recently, members of the school council did some research on how well reading was being promoted, providing you with some interesting information. Not all groups of pupils are involved in this way.

p.2

Main findings

Governors continue to provide the school with the right balance of support and challenge. They visit the school regularly to make sure they have an accurate view of how well the school is doing. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:  Increase opportunities for pupils to work in groups to solve problems independently.  Make sure pupils always have time to respond to teachers’ marking.  Develop ways of involving all groups of pupils in improving the school.

p.2

External support

The local authority has offered effective support in monitoring the impact you and other leaders have had on improving the school. Leaders have forged strong links with the partner school and this is giving all staff, including midday assistants and administrative staff, to share ideas and improve their work.

p.2

External support

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Sheffield.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion