Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Humphries

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Humphries

  • Postcode verified

    WS10 8BQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingeffectiveclearlyaccurately
Criticismlacklimitedabsencelowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
895
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Malcolm Morrey Headteacher Salisbury Primary School Salisbury Street Wednesbury WS10 8BQ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 15 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, the deputy headteacher, five middle leaders, the Chair and two members of the Governing Body. I also met with a representative of the local authority and eight pupils from Years 3, 4, 5 and 6. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A range of documentation was reviewed, including middle leaders’ action plans, parent and pupil questionnaires and information about pupils’ progress. I also visited classrooms with you and the deputy headteacher, to review learning activities and to talk to pupils about their learning.

p.1

Context

The governing body have merged with the governing body of a local primary school as a result of a formal federation. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

The actions in the school development plan clearly indicate how the quality of teaching and leadership and management will be strengthened in the short term in order to raise pupils’ achievements. However, the action plan does not identify measurable targets and dates when these targets will be achieved. In addition, the action plan does not indicate what actions are to be taken after September 2013.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are seeking to improve the quality of teachers’ marking through regular checking of books and discussions with pupils. However, the impact of this work is limited as highlighted by the work scrutiny I carried out which found that there is a lack of consistency across classes in how marking helps pupils improve their work.

p.2

Main findings

Governors meet regularly to discuss the progress of pupils. However, the information they receive from you and other leaders does not enable them to ask searching questions about the progress of different groups of pupils and to check that senior leaders are helping all pupils make better progress.

p.2

Main findings

Childrens’ progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage is improving. During visits to classrooms I saw pupils engaged in planned, purposeful play. The school leader who has responsibility for this stage is taking firm leadership especially in how teachers provide challenge and extend the pupils’ current learning.

p.2

Main findings

The end of Key Stage 1 teacher assessments for 2013 show that overall attainment in reading, writing and mathematics has improved from 2012. However, not all pupils make expected progress in writing and mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

The end of Key Stage 2 test results for 2013 show that overall attainment in reading, writing and mathematics has improved from 2012. However, there is still a gap between the achievement in reading and mathematics of pupils who receive the pupil premium grant (additional government funding) and those that do not.

p.2

Main findings

As a result of a range of measures including letters home, telephone calls on the first day of absence and home visits there has been a steady improvement in pupils’ attendance. Despite these recent improvements, attendance remains low and below national figures.

p.2

Main findings

Since the recent inspection you, and other school leaders, have introduced strategies that are used by teachers to improve their teaching. One such strategy is ‘Talk Boost’ which ensures pupils talk about their thoughts and ideas before they commit them to paper. These initiatives are in the early stages of development. This was confirmed during my visits to classrooms.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to ensure:  the school action plan has specific targets which link more closely to pupils’ progress and attainment and includes longer term targets and milestones so that progress can be more accurately measured  consistency in the quality of marking across the school so that pupils are better able to improve the quality of their work  the governors are presented with concise information about individual and groups of pupils’ progress so that they are able to ask challenging questions  activities given to pupils in lessons are better matched to their needs in writing and mathematics in Key Stage 1 and in reading and mathematics at Key Stage 2  pupils’ attendance is improved to be in line with national figures.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You are making good use of the support that has been offered or brokered by the local authority. Staff say they are benefitting from the training on improving questioning. Good practice in questioning was observed during the visit. There is further scope for training to develop the role of middle leaders.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Walsall.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion