Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Carter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Carter

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivelyoutstandingimprovingimprovedeffectiveeffectivelyswiftly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
834
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs L Paxton Headteacher Oakhill Primary School Rookery Lane Oakhill Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST4 5NS

p.1

Stoke-On-Trent

Following my visit to your school on 17 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Stoke-On-Trent

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, a representative from the local authority, a National Leader of Education who is providing you with support, and members of the governing body. We conducted a tour of the school which included a brief meeting with the pastoral support team leader. I looked at a sample of pupils’ work and considered the quality of marking. I evaluated your school improvement plans. I considered your most recent data on pupils’ achievement and attendance, and records of monitoring of teaching.

p.1

Context

The governing body has made three appointments who will take up their posts in September 2013. A newly qualified teacher will teach pupils in Year 3; an experienced teacher will teach pupils in Year 2 following the retirement of the existing post holder; and a temporary teacher has been appointed to teach pupils in Year 1. Two assistant headteachers will join you as members of the senior leadership team following the promotion of the existing deputy headteacher to a headship position in another school. The governing body has arranged for pupils in Year 6 to be taught in two smaller classes from September 2013.

p.1

Main findings

Since the inspection, you have swiftly devised and started to implement your action plan. This is sharply focused upon addressing the issues identified for improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers have responded positively to professional development activities. You have raised teachers’ expectations of what can be achieved, by enabling them to observe outstanding provision in schools which are in a similar context to your own. You have focused coaching on increasing opportunities for pupils to progress at a faster rate in lessons. Your review of marking and subsequent checking shows that pupils are responding to teachers’ comments and they know what they have to do next to improve their work. As a result of these developments, the quality of teaching is improving.

p.2

Main findings

You have strengthened leadership through embedding your system for tracking the progress and attainment of pupils. You are now using the information to underpin your judgements about the quality of teaching alongside information gathered from visits to lessons and scrutiny of pupil’s work. Your tracking reveals that pupils in all year groups have made accelerated rates of progress during the summer term.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are using the information about pupils’ progress to check their achievements more carefully through the newly formed ‘scrutiny’ committee. This has strengthened governors’ ability to make strategic decisions. For instance, they have re-organised arrangements of the teaching of pupils in Year 6 from September 2013, so they are taught in smaller groups. Governors acknowledge that they are not gathering enough first-hand evidence regarding the quality of teaching to complement the information which is provided by the school.

p.2

Main findings

The pastoral support team have worked more closely with parents and carers in order to stress the importance of their children attending school regularly. As a result, the rates of attendance and punctuality of pupils have improved.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 ensure that governors collect more first-hand evidence about the work of the school to supplement that which is provided and hold the school’s leaders to account more effectively for the school’s performance.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority adviser is monitoring closely the progress of the school and provides good levels of challenge and support. She has brokered additional support from a National Leader of Education. This support has been sharply focused on improving the skills of individual teachers. Teachers have responded positively to guidance and are applying aspects which have been identified for improvement in their practice.

p.3

External support

Governors have benefitted from an external review of their work. This has helped them to sharpen their checking on how well the school is performing through the setting up of the ‘scrutiny’ committee.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Stoke-On-Trent.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion