Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Gregory
- Postcode verified
WA2 8LQ
- URN verified
315255
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the inspection the provider has made good progress. p.1
- Procedures ensure that the staff are suitably vetted, experienced and qualified to work with children and the required adult to child ratios are met at all times. p.1
- In gathering evidence it was found that the provider records information about staff qualifications to enable effective monitoring of staff deployment. p.1
- The next visit will be a full inspection. p.2
- I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your setting. p.2
- If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter. p.2
- Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 366
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Winwick Pre-School Nursery Winwick Leisure Centre Myddleton Lane,Winwick Warrington Cheshire WA2 8LQ Our Reference 315255
p.1
Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Joan Isabel Madden, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 23/07/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
As a result of our inspection on 26/06/2013, we sent you a welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
In addition to the welfare requirement notice you were also issued a notice to improve.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
The welfare notice required you to complete the following actions by 22 July 2013: obtain an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check in respect of every person aged 16 and over who works directly with children as part of an effective system to ensure their suitability to work with children (Suitable People W2.1 3.9).
p.1
Outcome of the visit
The notice to improve set out two actions that asked you to: record information about staff qualifications to enable effective monitoring of staff deployment (Suitable people 3.12 W2.1) and ensure effective systems are in place to ensure that any person caring for, or in regular contact with children is suitable to work with children which include obtaining an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check Childcare Register CR3)
p.1
Outcome of the visit
Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time the setting is making good improvement overall.
p.1
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Since the inspection the provider has made good progress. Procedures ensure that the staff are suitably vetted, experienced and qualified to work with children and the required adult to child ratios are met at all times. In gathering evidence it was found that the provider records information about staff qualifications to enable effective monitoring of staff deployment.
p.1
Next steps
Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:
p.2
Next steps
The setting has made good improvement. The next visit will be a full inspection.
p.2
Next steps
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your setting. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.2
Next steps
Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion