Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Downlands Community School
Summary
Michael Pye (lead), Margaret Faull
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2013
- Inspectors verified
Margaret Faull, Michael Pye
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DT11 8BG
- Name on report verified
Downlands Community School
- URN verified
113659
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Their excellent behaviour and their social adaptability is seen in the way they behave in a similarly very positive way whether in lessons or in whole-school events such as assemblies. p.5
- Pupils benefit from exceptionally positive relationships in lessons, and good teaching helps ensure their above-expected levels of progress. p.1
- Links with parents and the local community are outstanding and are particularly aided through the effective use of modern communication technology. p.1
- This is proving highly effective in personalising pupils’ learning and challenges them to tackle a large number of questions. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,377
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Downlands Community School Blandford Camp, Blandford Forum, Dorset, DT11 8BG
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Pupils achieve well during their time in the school. This is the consequence of the schools’ careful tracking of progress, the quality of the teaching and the very positive attitudes of the pupils. The approach by the school to the use of information and communication technology is a strength – pupils have their own tablets, and these are particularly relevant to the innovative approach to the teaching of mathematics. Pupils benefit from exceptionally positive relationships in lessons, and good teaching helps ensure their above-expected levels of progress. The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding. Pupils behave extremely well both in lessons and elsewhere. They are very sociable, polite and relate extremely well to each other and adults. They say they feel very safe and secure. Strong leadership by the two co-headteachers has resulted in the development of an effective
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
leadership team, including governors. Given the unique character of the school, the staff invest heavily and effectively in ensuring that pupils feel welcome and settle quickly. Links with parents and the local community are outstanding and are particularly aided through the effective use of modern communication technology.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Not all teachers consistently use clear success criteria in lessons to help pupils identify what they have to do to succeed, and to encourage them to self-evaluate. Similarly, inconsistencies exist in the degree of challenge for high attainers and the provision of varied resources to meet the pupils’ different learning styles. In mathematics, there are inconsistencies in the degree to which all aspects of the curriculum are reinforced over time. Not all teachers conduct sufficiently regular checks on pupils’ understanding of their work or ensure they record a model of how to solve problems.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning and teaching in 15 lessons, including visits to the Early Years Foundation Stage, along with guided reading, and linking sounds and letters (phonics) sessions. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at progress and attainment data, the school’s development plan, curriculum plans, governing body documentation, and policies and procedures. Those relating to health and safety and safeguarding of pupils were carefully scrutinised. The inspection team listened to a sample of pupils from Years 2 and 3 reading. Inspectors took account of 75 responses to Ofsted’s online Parent View survey. Questionnaires completed by 29 members of the school staff were also considered. Discussions were held with senior and other leaders, teachers, learning support assistants, the Chair of the Governing Body and other governors, pupils, parents and a representative from the
p.2
Inspection team
Michael Pye, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Margaret Faull Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is an average-size primary school. The school is situated in an armed services camp which specialises in running training courses for members of the British Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force. Consequently, service families live in the camp for relatively short periods of time. This results in very high pupil mobility rates. Approximately a third of pupils enter or leave the school throughout the year, in addition to the expected number of pupils entering and leaving in Reception and Year 6. Children entering the Early Years Foundation Stage are organised in two Reception classes. The government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress, were met by the school in 2012. A pre-school operates from the school site. This is not run by the school’s governing body and is subject to a separate inspection. The high mobility rate means that the characteristics of the school population can change very
p.3
Information about this school
quickly. The judgements below, about the school population, are for the academic year ending in July 2012. The vast majority of pupils are known to be eligible for the pupil premium which provides additional funding for pupils eligible for free school meals, looked after children and pupils from service families. Last year, there were three pupils believed to be entitled to free school meals; currently there are none. There were no looked after children in Year 6 in 2012. The majority of pupils come from a predominantly White British background. The next largest minority ethnic group consists of pupils who are of Nepalese heritage, of Gurkha families. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is below average. There is a well above average proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs. The main
p.3
Information about this school
needs of these pupils relate to speech, language and communication needs.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Eradicate the inconsistencies in the quality of teaching through ensuring that all teachers: consistently use success criteria to ensure that pupils know the expected learning outcomes and that they carry out meaningful self-assessment ensure that high attainers are consistently challenged to do their best ensure that a good range of resources are readily available in lessons to meet the different learning styles of pupils. Improve attainment and progress in mathematics by removing the inconsistencies in teaching by ensuring that all teachers: provide more regular opportunities for pupils to reinforce their skills in all strands of the National Curriculum in mathematics ensure that pupils have, and consistently record, a model of the correct methodology for solving problems during lessons, conduct more regular checks about whether pupils have understood the learning.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils, including those not entitled to the pupil premium, achieve well given their starting points. Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with below the expected levels of skills and knowledge. They make good progress and leave Reception with levels closer to those expected. Current work shows and data support the picture of pupils’ good progress in English and mathematics. This includes disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. There is evidence that pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds often do better than pupils from a White British background. The published national comparison data for the school do not give an accurate picture of how this school contributes to pupil outcomes. This is because of the very high rate of pupil mobility. The data shows that in 2012, pupils’ attainment overall was well below average by the end of Year 6 and this was especially so for mathematics. It also suggests that pupils from the end of
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Year 2 make well below the expected progress overall. The current Year 6 are on track to attain above average levels. In 2012, those few pupils believed to be entitled to free school meals progressed less than a term behind their peers in both English and mathematics. Currently there are no such pupils on roll – but this can change quickly! In 2012, by the end of Year 2, reading standards, along with mathematics and writing, were average. The phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 was below average. Current indications are that current pupils would now exceed that average. The school has developed an accurate method of tracking progress and attainment using pupils’ entry points as a benchmark measure. The data shows high attainers, boys, girls, and pupils with English as an additional language progressing in line with their peers. Intervention to support pupils has a positive impact, but the provision map insufficiently shows the start and
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
finish points of pupils’ progress. Pupils heard reading in Years 2 and 3 are able to separate words into sounds and blend them together to pronounce the word correctly. Good diaries and reading targets help track pupils’ progress and inform parents and carers about how they can support their children.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
As a consequence of the teachers’ skills at building positive relationships, the pupils settle extremely quickly. A recent arrival in Year 5 was observed working well in a small group and was a full participant in discussions. In this very positive environment, pupils readily engage with their learning and give their views freely. This was seen in Reception, where children were observed involving themselves enthusiastically in a range of activities: singing, writing letters and sounding out, or riding trikes. The deployment and skills of the learning support assistants is a very positive aspect. As examples, in Year 1 and Year 5 mathematics lessons, the learning support assistants were pro- active in supporting pupils, used open-questioning and did not lead the pupils. There are some good examples in lessons of teachers modelling expected learning. A Year 1 phonics lesson saw the teacher accurately highlight the patterns of sounds and letters as pupils
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
were further challenged to find the appropriate word-card and arrange them in the correct ‘ie’, ‘igh’, and ‘y’ categories. There are also examples of high attainers being well challenged. In a Year 3 lesson based around a South African story, the teacher skilfully ensured that they discussed why a book might be banned. This led to a consideration of racism and the nature of apartheid. Not all teachers are so adept at consistently providing such challenge. A Year 2 mathematics lesson saw the pupils benefiting from the provision of a range of resources designed to meet their individual learning needs: worksheets, shapes for sorting and resources for number pattern work. However, not all lessons provide sufficient, varied and accessible resources. Learning objectives are made clear. However, opportunities are missed to provide information about what successful learning looks like and to use these criteria to encourage self-assessment.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
The school has introduced a new computerised learning programme for mathematics. This is proving highly effective in personalising pupils’ learning and challenges them to tackle a large number of questions. The system provides good assessment data which the teacher can access later and use for future learning. Being new, there are inconsistencies between teachers in how the learning opportunities are maximised. Progress is maximised where regular whole-class checks are made of the pupils’ understanding. Similarly, not all teachers ensure that pupils record the correct methodology which they can use when stuck on a question; this would help prevent a tendency for pupils to ‘guess’ the correct answer. Finally, the number work associated with this approach is not always complemented by regular reinforcement of other aspects of the curriculum. Marking is regularly carried out, is supportive and usually gives good direction about the next
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
steps in the pupils’ learning. The very large majority of the parents who completed the online survey believe their child receives good teaching. A small minority believe that the school does not set appropriate homework; the school is investigating this further.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding
Pupils adopt extremely positive approaches to their learning. They are keen, enthusiastic and want to achieve. They enjoy school. One pupil said, ‘It’s the best school I’ve ever been in’. Their excellent behaviour and their social adaptability is seen in the way they behave in a similarly very positive way whether in lessons or in whole-school events such as assemblies. The pupils say their lessons are not interrupted by behavioural issues. The school carefully records incidents and governors review the log regularly. A very consistent approach is adopted to behaviour management; one of an ethos of encouragement for positive behaviour rather than ‘upfront’ behaviour management. Pupils know the high expectations. Pupils’ moral development is reflected by the very high levels of respect shown for adults and their peers. They listen attentively, put hands up to answer questions, and work exceptionally
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding
well in groups. The ease with which pupils settle and the way they are welcomed and included is obvious in the ethos which pervades the school. There have been no exclusions. Pupils say that there is no bullying and that any behavioural incidents are dealt with quickly and effectively. The pupils have a good knowledge of what constitutes bullying, including cyber-bullying. The police, visiting to deliver internet danger messages, said they were impressed by the levels of pupils’ knowledge and understanding of this subject. The school promotes the ‘Rights and Respect’ agenda; consequently school and eco-councillors are regularly invited to give their views on matters of school life. Pupils enjoy responsibility. Younger pupils eagerly act as register monitors, older pupils act as reading buddies to younger and new pupils have a buddy. These contribute significantly to pupils’ spiritual, moral and social
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school’s vision is of maximising pupils’ potential. The emphasis is on developing more personalised learning through the extensive use of information and communication technology. The overwhelmingly positive responses to the staff questionnaire demonstrate their commitment to these aims. All adults, including receptionists and the site manager subscribe to the ethos of mutual respect which underpins school life and means that new pupils quickly feel included in school life. Leaders check the school’s work using a wide variety of methods. Lesson observations, learning walks, work scrutiny and pupil progress meetings take place. The latter helps raise accountability. To enable the tracking of progress, the headteachers introduced a good system of short-term evidence gathering. The recent introduction of online portfolios enables pupils’ work to be photographed, contextualised and uploaded. Also used to check progress, they promote parental links
p.5
The leadership and management are good
extremely well. A parent serving abroad can access the work completed by their child on a daily basis. Virtual badges, encrypted with details of why the award has been given, act as rewards. Subject leaders contribute well to monitoring and identify relevant development priorities. The literacy coordinator has contributed to the introduction of regular extended writing opportunities and new guided reading approaches. The mathematics coordinator has worked to introduce the new computerised programme and the impact has been seen in improving attainment and progress. Regular checks are made of teaching quality. Teachers obtain some good oral and written feedback. However, observations insufficiently focus on the progress of pupil groups other than gender. There is a need to complete a fuller picture of the quality of teaching. Progress data and the findings of work scrutiny need consideration to triangulate the evidence and give a full
p.6
The leadership and management are good
picture of teaching quality over time. Performance management for teachers is well established and links well with school and personal priorities. Professional development is used well to support teachers, and includes leadership training, and conferences for newly qualified staff. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Information and communication technology is increasingly a strength due to the effective support of the Digital LeadersThe pupils’ cultural development is well advanced through links with schools in Nepal and Italy. Links with parents and the immediate community are outstanding. Pupils share singing presentations with the camp choir and other schools. Parents eagerly praise the school for the support it gives families. A programme of personal and social development for families is particularly mentioned and is welcomed by new parents. There are close links with the local pre- schools and the local network of schools benefit pupils through such things as joint project work.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The local authority acknowledges the school’s unique character and the challenge of high mobility. It delivers ‘light touch’ support, supporting the creative mathematics curriculum and providing courses for coordinators and learning support assistants. Safeguarding and child protection arrangements are secure. The governance of the school: Governors challenge, and are able to do so through their effective checking of the school’s work. They visit regularly, receive subject and the headteachers’ reports, and check progress data and other school records. School councillors, commendably, have met governors. Governors have a good knowledge of the strengths of the school and where improvement is required. They have a secure knowledge of the teaching quality. There is a clear understanding of the link between a positive teaching record, salary progression and promotion. Governors set good, challenging performance targets for the school. These quickly become
p.6
The leadership and management are good
out of date because the school population, on which previous targets have been based, changes. Statutory responsibilities are met, especially with regard to health and safety and safe recruitment. They have a good understanding of which pupils qualify for the pupil premium but they have an insufficient knowledge of the impact of its expenditure.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 113659 Local authority Dorset Inspection number 411865
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 250 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jeremy Osbourne Headteacher Alan Frame Susan Whitlock Date of previous school inspection 3–4 March 2010 Telephone number 01258 453348 Fax number 01258 455286 Email address office@downlands.dorset.sch.uk guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion