Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Towl

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Towl

  • Postcode verified

    SL1 6HE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearimprovingrigorouspositivesuccessfullyclearly
Criticismnot outstandingnot alwaysnot consistentlynot strongnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings445w+17
  • What needs to improve219w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
660
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 33%

Full report text

Mrs J Laver Headteacher Priory School Orchard Avenue Slough SL1 6HE

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory School

Following my visit to your school on 15 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, senior and middle leaders and the Governing Body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. A telephone discussion was held with a representative of the local authority. The school action plan was evaluated.

p.1

Context

Two new deputies have been appointed and there are to be several staff changes before the start of the new September term. There will be a high proportion of teachers new to the profession in September. The school’s roll is likely to increase in coming years. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher and newly appointed deputy headteachers have quickly formed an effective team. The last inspection acted as catalyst for change. There are more rigorous procedures for checking the quality of teaching and monitoring the progress made by pupils. The school’s own monitoring shows that more teaching is good. There has been a clear focus on improving teaching and this has already led to greater consistency across all classes. There has been an effective focus on improving writing and reading and this is already beginning to have a positive impact on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders have a clear understanding about what is expected from them and the newly developed management structure is appropriate and should support good communication between leaders at all levels.

p.2

Main findings

Action plans clearly identify what needs to be done but there is not enough clarity about which actions could be achieved quickly and those which might take longer to achieve. Records from senior leaders’ lesson observations are not always specific enough and do not consistently make strong enough links between teaching and pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are improving their skills and have provided good support to the school to resolve staffing matters. They are successfully developing procedures to gather more information so that they know how well the school is doing. They are beginning to gain more first-hand information about what goes in school, day-to-day, and how new initiatives are developing, but these procedures are not yet fully in place.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 Make clearer which actions can be achieved quickly and those which may take longer to be completed.  Provide greater clarity about the role of senior leaders in checking that actions for improvement are completed on time.  Improve the clarity of notes from senior leaders’ lesson observations to ensure that the link between teaching and learning is very clear and explicitly identify why teaching is not the grade above, if it is not already outstanding.  Ensure that there is well-managed support for all teachers who are at the early stages of their careers.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has provided good support to help the school improve teaching and its provision for special educational needs. The school has sought other additional good quality support and advice in order to develop its provision for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion