Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Carter
- Postcode verified
LE67 2HA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 688
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ann Husband Headteacher Hugglescote Community Primary School Ashburton Road Hugglescote Coalville LE67 2HA
p.1
Community Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 4 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Community Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you and the deputy headteacher, a representative from the local authority and members of the governing body. We conducted a tour of the school. I evaluated your plans for improvement and considered documentation relating to the monitoring of teaching and your most recent data on pupils’ progress and attainment. I looked at a range of pupils’ work and evaluated the quality of marking. I considered your survey of parents’ views and scrutinised minutes of meetings of the governing body. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 6799169 Direct email :mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Context
Since the inspection, the governing body has appointed a permanent teacher in Year 5. Three members of staff have been appointed who will take up their positions in September 2013.
p.2
Main findings
Since the inspection, you have taken suitable action to address the areas identified for improvement. Staff are clear about what is expected in their practice following a review of the school’s teaching and learning policy. As a result of these revisions: teachers are providing pupils with more specific comments in their workbooks about how to improve their work; pupils are producing more detailed pieces of writing in a wider range of subjects; and pupils are using common strategies to help them solve problems and undertake investigations in mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
You and other senior leaders have collected a range of evidence which reveals that inconsistencies in the quality of teaching are being resolved. However, the evidence is not drawn together sharply enough so that you can provide sufficiently precise recommendations to individual teachers on how they can improve even further.
p.2
Main findings
You have refined your system for tracking the progress and attainment of pupils. Governors are now using assessment information more frequently to hold you to account for the achievement of pupils. This has highlighted the need to improve the progress of pupils in Year 4 and Year 5, particularly in mathematics. Governors have taken decisive action to appoint additional teachers in order that the current Year 4 pupils can be taught in smaller classes from September 2013.
p.2
Main findings
You have successfully sought the views of parents and carers to identify ways in which they can receive additional information about their children’s progress. As a result, you have introduced of termly written reports.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
accelerate the progress of pupils in Year 4 and Year 5 in mathematics refine your evaluation of the quality of teaching, taking into account evidence drawn from visits to lessons, scrutiny of pupils’ work, and your assessments on pupils’ progress in order to make more precise recommendations to help teachers to improve their practice.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Senior leaders are drawing upon a range of support provided by the local authority advisor and from the Forest Way Teaching School Alliance. Through coaching and training, teachers have developed their skills in engaging pupils more in their learning during lessons. Consequently, pupils are becoming better at reviewing their own learning and identifying where they need further support.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Leicestershire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion