Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Haynes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Haynes

  • Postcode verified

    SL6 3AX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh expectationseffectiverapid progressstrongindependentimproving
Criticismnot alwaysnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings539w+65
  • What needs to improve162w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
700
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 23%

Full report text

Heidi Swidenbank Headteacher Cox Green School Highfield Lane Maidenhead SL6 3AX

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Cox Green School

Following my visit to your academy on 15 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Cox Green School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, three governors, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I had a telephone conversation with an independent consultant who has been supporting the academy. The academy improvement plan was evaluated and I analysed a range of other documentation provided by the academy.

p.1

Main findings

Senior leaders have acted quickly and effectively since the inspection. The academy improvement plan has been adjusted well and addresses all of the areas for improvement. It is not always clear in the plan, however, who is monitoring actions and who is evaluating improvements. There are challenging targets in place for Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 123 1 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com students’ achievement, including in the sixth form. Teaching has been checked regularly and in detail. Leaders have given intensive support to those teachers who need it most, and this is helping to raise the quality of teaching overall. The best teaching has been identified and is being shared effectively. There has been extensive training for teachers on the areas of teaching that are most in need of

p.1

Main findings

improvement, for example making sure that all students are challenged effectively during lessons. Senior leaders have worked more closely with the subject departments that need the greatest support, for example physical education, design and technology, and religious studies. Subject leaders’ levels of accountability have been uniformly raised and senior leaders are, rightly, investing much time in improving middle leadership.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are challenging academy leaders effectively and monitoring closely the progress the academy is making. They visit the academy and meet very regularly to gauge the impact of leaders’ actions on students’ achievement. They have high expectations in terms of students’ progress and they expect leaders and teachers to rise to them. Governors have been fully involved in the recruitment process for key posts which begin in September 2013, including a new subject leader for English who will also lead the improvement of literacy across the academy. They have ensured that these appointments are of good quality. Through effective management of resources, governors have made possible an increase in the number of English teachers from September 2013 so class sizes in English can be smaller, with the intention of helping students make more rapid progress in this subject.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 clarify, within the academy improvement plan, who is monitoring actions and who is evaluating improvements.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Academy leaders have made good use of the advice and support of an independent consultant. This has led to a number of improvements, including a new behaviour policy, the development of new leadership roles focused on raising students’ achievement, and sharper plans to improve students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. The local authority will be monitoring the academy’s progress on a regular basis, and brokering links with local schools where there is strong practice, particularly in the sixth form. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Windsor and Maidenhead, the Education Funding Agency and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion