Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Sept 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Sanderson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Sanderson

  • Postcode verified

    OX16 1ER

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrengthseffectiveambitiousclearpositivelyclearlyrobust
Criticismweaknessesconcernsabsencenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
891
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Jane Haggitt Hanwell Fields Community School Rotary Way Banbury OX16 1ER

p.1

Community School

Following my visit to your academy on 3 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Community School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with two deputy headteachers, academy staff, the Primary Director of the United Learning Trust, the Chair of the Governing Body and three other governors to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy improvement plan was evaluated and the inspector also looked at documents used by leaders to monitor and evaluate the academy’s work. The inspector also accompanied the deputy headteachers on a tour around the academy visiting a number of classrooms.

p.1

Context

I was not able to meet you during this visit as you were on sick leave. During your absence the academy has been led by your two deputy headteachers. There have been no changes to staffing, pupil numbers or the governing body since the previous inspection. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5316 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : Shannyn.sachse@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

Academy leaders have responded positively to the findings of the previous inspection. The academy improvement plan has been suitably amended so that it addresses all the areas for improvement identified in the report. The plan contains sensible strategies that will help to improve the academy. Your two deputy headteachers have led the implementation of this plan well during your absence and they have the support of staff.

p.2

Main findings

The improvement plan has an appropriate focus on improving the quality of teaching in the academy. Lesson observations are beginning to have a greater focus on the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning and appropriate training is being arranged to improve teachers’ practice. However, the action plan does not contain clear, measurable targets for how the quality of teaching is expected to improve over the next 18 months.

p.2

Main findings

Systems to involve pupils in checking the quality of their work, particularly in mathematics, have developed well since the previous inspection. There has also been a greater focus on providing pupils with more opportunities to use their calculation skills to solve problems. Systems to track the progress of pupils are developing well and good plans are in place to hold class teachers more accountable for pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

The academy behaviour policy has been sensibly reviewed and re-established with all staff in order to promote a greater consistency in the way that behavioural issues are dealt with across the school. The school council and learning ambassadors have also rewritten the policy in their own words so that it is more accessible and more clearly understood by pupils. All incidents of bad behaviour and bullying are now recorded centrally and are beginning to be more effectively analysed to identify patterns and trends.

p.2

Main findings

A number of appropriate strategies have been introduced to more effectively inform parents and carers about what is happening in the academy. For example, school council newsletters are now sent home to parents and carers, a parent council is being established and the school website is being developed to contain a section that will provide information to parents and carers. A recent survey of parents’ and carers’ indicates some improvement in their views of behaviour and safety issues in the academy. However, some concerns remain and theses still need to be addressed.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are ambitious for the academy. As reported at the previous inspection, they have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the academy and they have been appropriately involved in developing the academy improvement plan. However, the plan does not make it sufficiently clear how governors will be involved in evaluating the impact of actions taken. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 set clear and measurable targets for the expected quality of teaching for at least the next 18 months  strengthen the academy’s improvement plan by clearly identifying the role of governors in evaluating the impact of the actions taken  regularly review parental views so that the impact of actions to inform and involve parents in what is happening in the academy can be evaluated.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The Primary Director of the United Learning Trust makes regular visits to the academy. They have a clear understanding of the academy’s strengths and weaknesses and provide robust support and challenge. Some effective support has been given to leaders in the development of their improvement plan and for the leadership and management of the school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Oxfordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion