Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Preston Springs Farmhouse
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
17 Jul 2013
- Inspectors verified
Trevor Hall
- URN verified
SC441080
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Staff support and supervision have, however, been adversely affected by managerial inconsistency and staff have not always received supervision at the frequency required by national minimum standards, or by the home's stated policies. p.4
- The perpetual lack of consistent and sustained leadership and management has had a detrimental impact upon the performance of the home and staff team and has potentially limited the outcomes for the young people in residence. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Care & placements2
“Care plans are individualised and are reviewed regularly.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 757
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC441080 Inspection date 17/07/2013 Inspector Trevor Hall Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 01/05/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children’s home is operated by an independent provider. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for three young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection in May 2013 the overall rating for the service was adequate. One statutory requirement and one recommendation were raised. Both of these issues have been appropriately addressed.
p.3
Progress
The home has made significant progress in promoting the educational achievement of the young people currently accommodated. Young people with a history of non- school attendance and school phobia are being re-introduced to formal education by the application of individualised education plans. Young people are supported to attend by a caring staff team who are aware of their individual anxieties. The staff provide reassurance and encouragement, which enable young people to achieve to the best of their ability.
p.3
Progress
The home now has staff of appropriate gender deployed within the home to enable all of the young people's identified care needs to be properly addressed.
p.3
Progress
The home continues to provide a satisfactory quality of care. Staff have an effective knowledge of the individual young people they care for. They provide personal support tailored to reflect each young person's development and to meet their changing needs. All identified health needs are appropriately addressed, with staff encouraging young people to take responsibility for themselves according to their age and level of understanding. Care plans are individualised and are reviewed regularly. Young people are enabled to be fully involved in their care planning arrangements.
p.3
Progress
Young people live in a safe environment; all necessary safety checks are conducted at the frequencies indicated in appropriate regulations. The home is clean, adequately maintained, and no health and safety issues were identified during the inspection process.
p.4
Progress
Employment practices are sound, with all staff appropriately vetted prior to employment in the home. Staff turnover has reduced since the last inspection and consistency of staff deployment is much improved, enabling more sustainable relationships between staff and young people to be formed. This has had a generally positive impact on young people's behaviour.
p.4
Progress
All staff deployed in the home have completed all of their core training. All shift leaders hold an appropriate qualification in childcare. Staff support and supervision have, however, been adversely affected by managerial inconsistency and staff have not always received supervision at the frequency required by national minimum standards, or by the home's stated policies.
p.4
Progress
The home does not currently have a manager in post, although appropriate alternative management arrangements are in place. Since being registered in November 2011 the home has had several managers, none of whom have stayed in post more than six months. The perpetual lack of consistent and sustained leadership and management has had a detrimental impact upon the performance of the home and staff team and has potentially limited the outcomes for the young people in residence. The provider acknowledges that there is an urgent need to appoint an appropriate manager to this home to provide the stability and leadership necessary to enable outcomes for young people to improve. The provider regularly reviews and effectively monitors the functioning of the home and takes required action to improve the quality of the service when deficiencies are identified.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that staff have access to support and advice, and are provided with regular supervision by appropriately qualified and experienced staff. (NMS 19.4)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion