Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lesley Cox
- Postcode verified
RM8 1UR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school improvement plan correctly identifies the actions that need to be taken and demonstrates that leaders have a good understanding of the priorities. p.2
- The roles of the governing body and local authority in supporting, monitoring and evaluating improvements also need to be made clearer. p.2
- While teachers have fully embraced the improvements and are supportive of school leaders, the impact on pupils’ progress has still to be measured and there are some gaps in learning that still need to be addressed. p.2
- For example, in deciding how the school’s considerable pupil premium should be spent and measuring the impact it is having. p.2
- The school should now take further action to: p.2
- They have been particularly helpful in linking you with good schools within the area which has helped you identify the actions that you need to take on your own journey to good. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 866
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Paramjit Roopra Henry Green Primary School Green Lane Dagenham RM8 1UR
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 13 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, a group of teachers, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated along with other documentation. I also carried out a tour of the school with you.
p.1
Context
There have been a significant number of staff changes. The deputy headteacher, assistant headteacher and special educational needs co-ordinator have taken up their positions since the last inspection. Five teachers and two support staff are also new to the school since the February inspection. Three newly qualified teachers have been recruited to start in September. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
You have moved quickly to address the need for a stronger focus on raising standards across the school. No time has been lost in appointing other senior leaders to enable you to do this. The new team is already working together in a strong partnership. Other recent teaching appointments have brought some much needed stability to the school.
p.2
Main findings
The school improvement plan correctly identifies the actions that need to be taken and demonstrates that leaders have a good understanding of the priorities. However, it is not always clear who is responsible for specific actions and who will check that they have been carried out. Some actions that link to the improvement areas within the inspection report are not given the attention they deserve, which may mean that the rate of improvement is not monitored closely enough. The roles of the governing body and local authority in supporting, monitoring and evaluating improvements also need to be made clearer.
p.2
Main findings
You are aware that there is still considerable work to be completed before the quality of teaching and learning can be judged as securely good. Considerable staff changes, although necessary, have meant that new initiatives have not yet been fully embedded. Teachers are now held accountable for their performance and additional training has taken place, for example in the use of phonics to improve reading in Key Stage 1. This has led to improved standards but still needs to be extended to other year groups and other staff next term. While teachers have fully embraced the improvements and are supportive of school leaders, the impact on pupils’ progress has still to be measured and there are some gaps in learning that still need to be addressed.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are asking challenging questions when they receive detailed information from the headteacher. However, they recognise that they have an increasing role to play in the school’s strategic leadership. For example, in deciding how the school’s considerable pupil premium should be spent and measuring the impact it is having. While it is encouraging that the external review of the governing body has now been commissioned, the delay in arranging this has meant that there is little time for any recommendations to be put securely in place ready for the start of next term.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should now take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
ensure that the external review of governance is completed and any recommendations are implemented as quickly as possible amend the school improvement plan to include all the areas mentioned in the inspection report and identify how leaders, governors and the local authority will monitor the effectiveness of the improvements and their impact on pupils’ learning ensure that the quality of teaching improves and pupils’ standards rise by implementing a rigorous programme of monitoring, targeted support and effective interventions from next term.
p.2
External support
You are appreciative of the on-going support provided by local authority officers which you consider to be of a high standard. They have been particularly helpful in linking you with good schools within the area which has helped you identify the actions that you need to take on your own journey to good.
p.3
External support
They have correctly identified that you need their support until you and your leadership team are fully established. They have helped you to agree priorities and are supportive of the actions you have taken to recruit new staff.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Barking and Dagenham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion