Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Cleethorpes Academy
Summary
Tanya Harber Stuart (lead), Lynne Selkirk, Paul Copping
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2013
- Inspectors verified
Lynne Selkirk, Paul Copping, Tanya Harber Stuart
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DN35 9NX
- Name on report verified
Cleethorpes Academy
- URN verified
136192
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In too many lessons all the students are asked to complete the same work. p.1
- This means the progress students can make is limited and is a major reason why their progress requires improvement. p.1
- Many questions asked by teachers in lessons do not challenge the students to think about their answers. p.1
- This limits the progress students make as questions confirm what they already know and do not add to their knowledge. p.1
- Staff expectations are rising but they are not high enough to enable students to make good progress. p.1
- Not all curriculum leaders are monitoring systematically, or effectively enough to ensure students make good progress. p.1
- Curriculum leaders have not always held staff to account for the progress students make. p.1
- Raise levels of attainment and improve progress so all students make at least good progress. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,912
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Cleethorpes Academy Grainsby Avenue, Cleethorpes, Lincolnshire, DN35 9NX
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
In too many lessons all the students are asked to complete the same work. This means the progress students can make is limited and is a major reason why their progress requires improvement. Many questions asked by teachers in lessons do not challenge the students to think about their answers. This limits the progress students make as questions confirm what they already know and do not add to their knowledge. Staff expectations are rising but they are not high enough to enable students to make good progress. Not all curriculum leaders are monitoring systematically, or effectively enough to ensure students make good progress. Curriculum leaders have not always held staff to account for the progress students make.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The Principal and Chief Executive have a very clear vision for the academy and how to improve the quality of education provided. The governors support the senior leadership team in making difficult decisions; they also challenge them to ensure the quality of education improves. The students respect each other, and the staff. Parents, staff and students agree behaviour is good. Students encourage each other to behave well, look out for each other and feel safe.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed 34 lessons. Twenty-three of these lesson observations were done jointly with members of the senior leadership team. Lessons were observed in Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4 with a range of subjects observed. Meetings were held with the Principal, the Vice-Principal, the Chief Executive, members of the senior leadership team, curriculum leaders, the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body, teaching assistants and teachers with no leadership responsibilities. A telephone conversation was held with the Academy’s Improvement Partner. Inspectors met with groups of students and also spoke with them at informal social times. Inspectors scrutinised students’ work, read documents presented to them, including those relating to governance, students’ progress, self-evaluation, improvement planning, the curriculum and safeguarding. One response was made to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View); this was too low a number to
p.2
Information about this inspection
view. The 10 responses to the staff questionnaire were taken into account by the inspection team. The school’s surveys of parental and student views were considered.
p.2
Inspection team
Tanya Harber Stuart, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Helen Lane Her Majesty’s Inspector Lynne Selkirk Additional Inspector Paul Copping Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Cleethorpes Academy is a smaller than average 11−16 secondary school. It is part of the Tollbar Multi Academy Trust. The Academy opened in September 2010 replacing a school in special measures. The proportion of students supported by the pupil premium (extra funding provided by the government for students who are entitled to free school meals, looked after by the local authority or are children of service families) is higher than the national average. The proportion of students supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is lower than the national average but the proportion of students supported at school action is higher than the national average. An alternative curriculum is provided for a very small number of students in collaboration with local authority pupil referral units, CPO media and the Young Person’s Support Centre. In 2012, the academy met the government’s current floor standard, which sets out the minimum
p.3
Information about this school
expectations for students’ attainment and progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so it is at least good by ensuring: marking informs the students what they have done well and what they need to do to improve and students are given the opportunity to act on feedback they receive staff develop consistently the students’ literacy and numeracy skills in lessons the work students are asked to do is appropriately challenging given the academic ability of the students lessons are focused on learning not on students completing tasks staff use effective questioning to develop students’ knowledge and understanding of the work they are completing.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise levels of attainment and improve progress so all students make at least good progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: developing the monitoring cycle so all know what is to be monitored, when and by whom curriculum leaders concentrating on improving the quality of teaching in their areas ensuring all leaders and managers hold teachers to account for the progress their students make focusing all actions on ensuring students make at least good progress.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The proportion of students achieving five A* to C grades including mathematics and English has risen over the past three years. The proportion of students achieving A* to C grades in other subjects is increasing but in some subjects it is still low. The progress made by students in mathematics in now broadly in line with the national average, having been below for two years. The progress made by students in English is also broadly in line with the national average. Given their starting points the progress students make requires improvement. The progress the students supported by pupil premium make is improving. The gaps between the progress made, and attainment reached, by students funded by the pupil premium and other students are closing but the speed at which they are closing is slow. Overall, students supported at school action, school action plus and those students who have a statement of special educational needs, make the same progress as their peers. Some of these
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
students are making better progress in English because of the school’s strategy to have smaller classes and more support in these lessons. This strategy has been partly funded by pupil premium money. The progress of students educated at alternative provision is in line with their peers and requires improvement. The academy tracks carefully these students with weekly meetings ensuring the school takes action quickly if placements are not appropriate. The Year 6 into Year 7 money is used to develop students’ literacy levels through buddy reading, one-to-one tuition and small group literacy sessions. In addition, all students in Years 7 and 8 are involved in the Cleethorpes Academy Reading Scheme. These actions are slowly raising the students’ literacy skills, in particular their reading levels.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The quality of teaching is improving and this has had a direct impact on improving the progress students make. However, the quality of teaching is not good enough to ensure students make good progress. Often marking does not inform the students what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. Students are rarely given time to consider the comments staff make about their work and students then continue to make the same mistakes. Although some marking does highlight literacy errors too much does not. In too many lessons all students are asked to complete the same work. Some students find the work too easy and some find it too hard. Work often focuses on tasks the students need to complete rather than on what they need to learn. In some lessons, such as a Year 10 business studies lesson, teachers ask questions which encourage students to think about their answers and link them to other parts of the lesson.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
However, too often, teachers ask questions which just confirm what students know rather than developing their understanding of the subject. In a few lessons, such as a Year 9 performing arts lesson, students are given the opportunity to take total responsibility for their learning. In this lesson, the teacher, because she knew the ability of the students so well, arranged the groups so all students had a role which challenged them. In their groups they supported each other exceptionally well, making sure each of them participated and was listened to. Excellent questioning, and a focus on understanding and using keywords, all contributed to the students making outstanding progress. Teaching assistants, when they are given the opportunity to participate in the development of learning, make a positive contribution to the progress students make. However, teaching assistants are not always able to support students effectively because of the way lessons are
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
planned. This means they are less able to improve the progress students make. An audit of numeracy skills across all subjects has been completed. The development of literacy has been a priority because of the needs of the students. However, literacy and numeracy skills are not developed consistently in all lessons and this is limiting the progress the students make.
p.4
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
More students now attend the academy more regularly and the proportion of students who are persistently absent has decreased considerably over the past three years. This is because of the actions the academy is taking to involve parents and students in improving attendance. There is very little bullying. Parents, students and staff all agree the students are safe in the academy. Students said they had someone they could talk to and when, on the very rare occasions that bullying occurs, it is dealt with swiftly and effectively. Students understand the different types of bullying and are aware of the need to keep themselves safe in both the ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ worlds. The academy has moved away from a policy of excluding students to including them. The inclusion room is run effectively to ensure students are given the opportunity to think about their actions and also to make sure they keep up with their work.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
In lessons, when activities are engaging and motivating, students behave very well. They work well together and keep each other safe. For example, in a Year 8 technology lesson, students were engaged in ‘making a box project’. One student, on a rota basis, was designated as safety officer. These students made sure the other students were adhering to health and safety regulations. This meant the students took responsibility for themselves and others.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Senior leaders, including governors, evaluate accurately the quality of teaching and the impact of teaching on students’ progress. The system for managing the performance of teachers is reviewed regularly. It ensures there is a clear link between the progress the students make and the rewards teachers receive. However, some aspects do focus on tasks teachers need to complete rather than the progress students make. This has been acknowledged and a new policy is in the process of being introduced to remove this aspect. Bespoke support has been provided to some teachers to improve the quality of teaching and this is having an impact. However, the overall quality of teaching requires improvement. Curriculum leaders are doing some monitoring but much of it is not systematic. This means it is not always clear who is doing what monitoring and what the impact of monitoring will be on improving the progress the students make.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
The students’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development is developed through the curriculum, assemblies and tutor time. There is a range of trips to expand the students’ knowledge of different cultures and religions. The curriculum is broad and balanced. It is flexible enough to ensure students are treated as individuals with bespoke packages being put together to enable students to follow courses which meet their needs and interests. As a result, there are a very small number of students not in education, employment or training at the end of Year 11. The policy on early entry for GCSE examinations has been changed this academic year to ensure students able to achieve the higher grades do so rather than focusing on students achieving a C grade and no higher. The policy is now applied on a student by student basis to ensure progress is made. The single central record and recruitment procedures meet statutory requirements.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
The governance of the school: The governors are committed to the academy. They are passionate about the students and ensuring the academy provides the best education for them. They are knowledgeable about the strengths and weaknesses of the academy and curriculum areas. They have supported and challenged the senior leaders to improve the quality of education provided. Pupil premium funding is helping to close the gap in attainment with students who are not in receipt of this additional funding. Cleethorpes Academy works closely with other schools in the Tollbar Multi Academy Trust. There are opportunities for staff to work across the trust and there are strong links to enable the students to continue their education at TollBar Academy post 16. The Chief Executive provides additional challenge to the senior leadership team and has contributed well to the improving education provided by the academy.
p.5
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 136192 Local authority Not applicable Inspection number 399783
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Academy sponsor-led School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 791 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Philip Bond Principal Martin Brown Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01472 582311 Fax number 01472 583211 Email address enquiries@cleethorpesacademy.co.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion