Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Aelwyn Pugh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Aelwyn Pugh

  • Postcode verified

    L30 3SA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−21Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseclearconfidententhusiasticrigorousstrengthsindependentclearlytimely
Criticismweaknessesnot sufficientlylacklimitednot consistentlynot effectivenot precisenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,047
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
28 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Bernadette Shiels Our Lady of Walsingham Catholic Primary School Stand Park Avenue Netherton Bottle Merseyside L30 3SA

p.1

Walsingham Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school, on 4 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills, to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Walsingham Catholic Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you and the deputy headteacher, members of the governing body, a group of pupils from Year 6, and representatives of the local authority and the Archdiocese of Liverpool, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement action plan and examined a range of other documentation, including the minutes of governing body meetings, written feedback on lessons that you have observed, a draft version of the revised marking policy, data on pupils’ progress and attainment, and reports on the support provided by the local authority.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection, you have returned to lead the school, after a period of illness, and the acting headteacher has re-assumed his role as deputy head. The CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com chair of governors has tendered her resignation, with effect from September, and you are about to appoint a new nursery teacher for the next academic year.

p.1

Main findings

Despite your disappointment with the inspection judgement, you and your colleagues are determined to tackle the weaknesses in the school, so that it can once again become good.

p.2

Main findings

The children to whom I spoke reported that, since the inspection, they have seen an improvement in the quality of marking. Whereas, in the past, comments on their work might have been limited to a line, they are now more extensive and useful. They are also given more opportunities to produce extended pieces of writing and to draft and re-draft their work. They feel more confident to ask for help from their teachers and are enthusiastic about the way that some teachers are endeavouring to make lessons more interesting. You are making clear progress in tackling the areas for improvement in the Early Years Foundation Stage. This includes ensuring that regular use is made of the outdoor areas, which are being further developed through the provision of new and attractive equipment.

p.2

Main findings

Although improvements are being made, they are not sufficiently coordinated. Your action plan does not focus sharply on the specific areas for improvement identified in the inspection report. It does not include precise figures to show how much improvement you expect to make over a particular period of time. It does not give a clear indication of when actions are to start and finish and what effect they are expected to have in the short, medium and long term. In some cases, actions and outcomes are confused with each other and there is a lack of clarity about when and how the school is to become good.

p.2

Main findings

Following an independent review, the governing body has produced an action plan which focuses on ensuring that its members have the skills to interpret data and to be more rigorous in holding the school to account. Some training has been provided to support this. The intention is to re-constitute the governing body and to increase the number of meetings held each term. At present, however, the governors rely too heavily on you and are still not taking a sufficiently active part in the work of the school. They did not make a direct contribution to developing the action plan, despite being given the opportunity to do so, and they do not have a sense of urgency about moving the school forward.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection, you have conducted a number of lesson observations, using a new format for providing feedback to staff. The evaluations are clear about the strengths and weaknesses of the teaching and include useful suggestions on how lessons could be made better. However, they do not focus consistently on the areas for improvement identified in the inspection report and give too little attention to the amount of progress that groups and individuals make during a lesson. On the basis of this evidence, my judgement is that senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not focused sharply on bringing about rapid improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders should take immediate action to:

p.3

Main findings

 amend the action plan so that it: - focuses explicitly on the specific areas for improvement identified in the inspection report - extends beyond one year and includes clearly defined targets and timescales for ensuring that the school is good - gives a clear indication of the actions to be taken to achieve those targets - identifies specific milestones for monitoring the rate of improvement, so that any necessary adjustments can be made in a timely way

p.3

Main findings

 work with the local authority to identify schools that are good or better, in order to establish links with them and to learn from their best practice

p.3

Main findings

 work with the local authority and the Archdiocese to strengthen the governing body, so that it takes a far more active role in the leadership of the school.

p.3

Main findings

I will be returning to the school in October 2013 to check on progress and offer support if necessary.

p.3

External support

The local authority is providing additional, centrally-funded support through its school improvement protocols. So far, this has included advice on the production of the school and governors’ action plans, discussions on future support for English and mathematics and helpful advice and support on the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Sefton, the Diocesan Director of Schools and the lead inspector.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion