Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jonathan Palk
- Postcode verified
PL6 8UN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“We talked about how these could be further refined through target setting.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 681
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Lee Plym Bridge Nursery and Children's Centre Miller Way Plymouth PL6 8UN
p.1
and Childrens’ Centre
Following my visit to your school on 5 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
and Childrens’ Centre
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in 20 March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, your assistant headteacher, three representatives of the Governing Body, the local authority adviser for the Early Years Foundation Stage and two teachers, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. We visited the morning session in the nursery, looked at documents relating to recording and reporting children’s development and the outcomes of your session observations.
p.1
Context
The roles and responsibilities of staff have been clarified following a restructuring of staff in the children’s centre, day care and nursery. The interim board of governors is in the process of reconstituting as a federated board with the Hambridge nursery.
p.1
Main findings
Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com The restructuring of the staff has been managed well. You have revised teachers’ performance management. Teachers and teaching assistants now have roles and responsibilities commensurate with their salaries and experience. This ensures that everyone is more accountable for contributing to improving school performance. As a consequence staff morale is strong.
p.1
Main findings
You are leading the school in a well organised way. Your actions focus precisely on the areas requiring improvement. You have implemented regular observations of children in the nursery so checks on their progress are made over time. We talked about how these could be further refined through target setting. You have quickly reorganised the session times to provide more opportunities for children to explore ideas and develop language through play. Teachers are planning together and focus rightly on the interests of the children. The free play is still not reflecting these interests well enough. Teachers’ planning does not show a deeper understanding of the child’s stage of development and learning and how the activity will advance this.
p.2
Main findings
The snack time was a good example of how you have raised expectations about children’s ability to organise themselves and make choices. This is having a positive benefit children’s learning and development. Teachers have appreciated your guidance in planning. They now need to take more charge of this for themselves so they can respond quickly to the learning that is going on.
p.2
Main findings
The governors have the expertise they require to check on the action being taken to improve the nursery. The plans to amalgamate with another nursery are distracting and they have yet to plan how they intend to carry out this responsibility.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
Further develop staff understanding and knowledge of the Early Years Foundation Stage principles Ensure the free play activities mirror closely the group session activties so children can reinforce what they are learning Implement procedures and processes whereby the governing body can carry out more challenge
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Local authority has supported you well through the staff restructuring. They have provided good guidance on how to deal with the budget deficit and financial management. They plan to use experienced Early Years Foundation Stage teachers to train your staff in observing sessions. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Plymouth City.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion