Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michelle Parker

  • Postcode verified

    WS3 3QH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveeffectivelyoutstandingstrongaccurateimprovingstrengths
Criticismlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
799
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs S Milner Headteacher Lower Farm Primary School Bakewell Close Walsall WS3 3QH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 4 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, your deputy headteacher and phase leaders, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority and the headteacher of the local teaching school to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. I looked at minutes of the full governing body and those of its sub committees, the school’s monitoring, teachers’ planning, two anonymised teachers’ appraisals, and the outcomes from lesson observations and staff training, pupils’ progress data for reading, writing and mathematics across the school, pupil premium data, the school’s data on attendance and punctuality, the new behaviour policy, pupils’ work in literacy, and feedback from teachers. I observed two lessons and your feedback. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Evidence

www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection one newly qualified teacher and an assistant headteacher have left. A new deputy headteacher and a care, guidance and support manager have joined the staff. Three new governors have joined the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection you have worked swiftly to address the key issues identified in the report. The strong link with the teaching school has been used effectively to provide all staff with training. Teachers have completed the Improving Teaching and the Outstanding Teaching courses. This training has improved teachers’ planning and their questioning. Evidence of this was seen in the lessons observed. Teachers modelled writing to pupils which helped them understand how to structure their own writing. Pupils knew their targets and teachers’ marking helped them to improve their work. Pupils have more opportunities to write at length in all subjects. You have an accurate view of teaching. Your feedback to teachers correctly identified their strengths and areas for development. Every pupil’s reading age is assessed and regularly monitored and careful interventions are made through the reading recovery

p.2

Main findings

programme. The teaching of letters and sounds has improved because all teachers and teaching assistants are teaching in the same way. Pupils’ understanding and progress in mathematics has been improved because of the introduction of a new mathematics scheme. There are clear expectations of teachers. All teachers have had training in assessing pupils’ work to ensure assessments are accurate and teachers have the same view of what each National Curriculum level looks like.

p.2

Main findings

Attendance has improved and persistent absences have reduced because attendance is monitored more effectively. Pupils’ behaviour has improved because all staff understand and follow the new behaviour policy.

p.2

Main findings

The school development plan has been rewritten to address the areas for development identified in the last inspection. There are clear targets for improvement but there are no milestones to allow you to check on progress more frequently. You have restructured the senior leadership team and it is more effective in monitoring teaching and learning.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body is more effective in holding you to account. Its committees have governors with appropriate skills and their scrutiny of the work of the school is improving. Newly appointed link governors come into school regularly to look at learning, pupils’ work and to talk to staff and pupils. Your information to the governors is more detailed and enables them to have a more accurate picture of pupils’ progress. Governors have a better understanding of staff appraisal. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 ensure there are regular milestones in your development plan.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority provides appropriate support. The school adviser regularly monitors and challenges school leaders. The Early Years Foundation consultant has helped staff improve the outside teaching area. The good support from the teaching school has been used for staff training.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Walsall.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion