Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Allan Torr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Allan Torr

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−61Very criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingclearly
Criticisminadequatelacksnot alwaysnot clearnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings211w0
  • Leadership505w−61

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
716
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%Leadership 68%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Roberta Blakemore Headteacher St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, Wallasey Wheatland Lane Wallasey Merseyside CH44 7ED

p.1

Wallasey

Following my visit to St Joseph’s Primary on 3 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school's recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Wallasey

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in April 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, I met with you and the senior leadership team, four members of the governing body and representatives from the local authority and the diocese. I evaluated the local authority’s statement for action and school documents that showed the impact of improvements you and the team have made thus far.

p.1

Context

Prior to the inspection, the headteacher gave her notice to retire at the end of the summer term. A new headteacher has been appointed and will start in September. The vice-chair of the governing body stepped down after the inspection due to work commitments.

p.1

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

After the inspection, senior leaders quickly brushed away the disappointment of the inspection judgements and galvanised staff to make the improvements needed to raise pupils’ achievement. Through honest self-reflection, they identified additional things they needed to do to improve. They work well together as a team to tackle the issues identified by Ofsted. With help from the local authority assessment team, all teachers have now been trained, for instance, in how to track pupils’ progress and attainment electronically. They use the tracking in discussion with senior leaders in the termly pupil progress meetings to identify pupils making slower or faster than expected progress. As a result, senior leaders are better placed to identify staff training needs and staff are better placed to know which pupils they need to target to improve. There is a greater focus in teaching on planning lessons based on pupils’ needs.

p.1

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Senior leaders have made adjustments to the teaching of reading. Teaching assistants have been trained in how to use running records; pupils now read daily and change their books more frequently. These adjustments alongside changes made earlier in the year have resulted in increased attainment in reading and knowledge of phonics (letters and the sounds they represent).

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The school’s action plan has been written by the local authority until the new headteacher starts. The plan covers all of the points for improvement identified in the inspection but it lacks detail and is not clear enough. As a result, it would be difficult to measure the success the actions have had on improving the school. Similarly, the plan does not always make clear how success will be measured. The local authority and school need to resubmit the plan and include a greater focus on raising pupils’ attainment in Years 1 and 2. Governance was judged to be inadequate at the inspection. This is no longer the case so the action plan may have less of a focus on actions to improve the work of the governing body. Governors have completed a skills audit to identify the knowledge and understanding of each governor and challenge senior leaders frequently on what they are doing to improve.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The local authority’s statement of action clearly identifies how it will consult parents through meetings, newsletters and focus groups. It also identifies the resources needed to be allocated to tackle each of the points for improvement identified in the inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

As teaching and leadership are not yet good enough the school is in a fragile position and would not be a good training ground for a newly qualified teacher.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The local authority’s action plan for the school is not fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Wirral. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion