Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Katrina Gueli
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 999
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com
p.1
Mrs Colleen Gibson Headteacher Crigglestone St James Church of England Primary Academy St James Way Wakefield West Yorkshire WF4 3HY
p.1
Church of England Primary Academy, Wakefield
Following my visit to your school on 2 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Church of England Primary Academy, Wakefield
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, staff, pupils, members of the Governing Body and representatives of the local authority. I also spoke with another representative of the local authority prior to the visit. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plan and had a tour of the academy with three, Year 6 pupils. I scrutinised a range of documents including data from the tracking of pupils’ progress and the report produced following the external review of governance.
p.1
Context
Two teachers will leave the school at the end of the summer term. These class teacher vacancies will be taken-up by existing senior leaders.
p.1
Main findings
You, other leaders, governors and staff were deeply disappointed with the outcome of the inspection and feel that you do not recognise the academy from the report. Responses from many parents also reflected this view. Nevertheless, you and your team of staff, along with governors are determined to address the areas for improvement identified and are taking swift and effective action to do so. Your post-Ofsted action plan is detailed with clear milestones and success criteria. Targets for 2014 are significantly higher than those for 2013 and these set a demanding trajectory for improvements in achievement. Improvements to systems to track pupil progress are enabling you to hold more robust professional discussions with class teachers. Expertise within the academy is being used well to help individual teachers improve their practice and you feel there are early signs that this is having an impact on the quality of teachers’ planning and the learning environment.
p.2
Main findings
The pupils who showed me around the school talked enthusiastically of the range activities that the school offers. They were clearly looking forward to the fair on Friday which is part of activities to celebrate it is 150 years since the school opened. In lessons, many pupils were busily solving mathematical problems related to the event. Pupils who met with me reported that ‘self-improvement time’ to respond to marking and teacher comments at the start of lessons is making a positive difference to their learning.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils also appreciate the new, themed reading corners for each class and the daily opportunities for independent reading time. They feel this development is helping them to read more widely and frequently. Staff confirmed that other strategies, such as the buddy reading you are trialling, involving Year 1 and Year 5 pupils, is already increasing pupils’ enjoyment of, and confidence in reading in both year groups.
p.2
Main findings
The range of staff development sessions delivered by your leadership team have focused sharply on improving aspects of practice identified as less effective during the inspection. Staff interviewed felt these have been beneficial in helping them to reflect and improve their approaches to teaching and their use questioning. Staff also noted how their planning for topics is focussing more sharply on the literacy and numeracy skills that will be practised alongside the subject skills and knowledge pupils will learn. Your leadership team’s monitoring and evaluation have identified that learning environments are being used more effectively to encourage pupils to be independent learners. Teachers feel pupils are responding positively to increasing degrees of challenge in lessons.
p.2
Main findings
The external review of governance has been completed and recommendations for how this aspect of leadership and management can be improved are clear. The review is still to be discussed in detail at a full governing body meeting but governors rightly recognise that expectations of governance have changed significantly and that training and development will be needed to meet these increased demands.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to: take swift action to respond to the findings of the review of governance ensure that information is clearly presented to governors so they can monitor the academy’s progress towards ‘good’ effectively.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
You make good use of your service level agreement with the local authority to support academy monitoring and evaluation on a termly basis. Additional work with the local authority since the inspection has usefully confirmed the accuracy of your judgements of teaching quality. The review commissioned by the school through the local authority governor service team has provided a detailed evaluation of current strengths and areas for development. The opportunity to access bespoke support to address the reviews’ findings is a useful resource.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board Local authority - including where the school is an academy the academy chain where relevant Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation The lead inspector.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion