Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Redpath

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Redpath

  • Postcode verified

    BS14 9LS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrong
Criticismyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings431w+11
  • What needs to improve46w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
468
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms B McLaughlin Headteacher St Bernadette Catholic Secondary School Fossedale Avenue Whitchurch Bristol BS14 9LS

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 10 July 2013 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with senior leaders who coordinate the alternative provision and examined a range of documents. I also visited Include, a provider that your students attend.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school provides a range of courses which meet the needs of almost all students either on the school site or through established college links. Consequently, the school does not feel the need to place any students with part-time providers and only a very small proportion of students require arrangements which involve the use of full-time alternative educational provision.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Provision is selected following the use of a range of strategies and a thorough consideration of a student’s particular needs.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Partnership work with the local authority and other schools in the south Bristol area has helped to identify suitable providers that meet students’ academic, social and behavioural needs.  Providers receive a good level of information about the individual needs of students prior to their attendance and report they have good on-going communication with the school.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 All students are provided with a broad curriculum which includes a strong emphasis on developing students’ personal and social skills. While most students are studying a suitable range of subjects, including English and mathematics, at GCSE level, a few students are studying some subjects at Entry level, which may not offer sufficient challenge.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Providers send regular reports to the school on students’ general progress, personal development and attendance.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Since alternative provision was not used in the previous academic year, a picture of its long term success has yet to emerge. Recent evidence shows that attending alternative provision has helped students to re-engage with learning and to make suitable career choices for when they leave school. Of the four students who used alternative provision, two have enrolled on college courses for September 2013 and one will begin an apprenticeship. The fourth student is still considering her options and receiving guidance.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 checking students’ progress more closely to ensure that courses are giving students the right level of challenge

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 monitoring the attendance and the amount of taught time students receive at the alternative education provision, including considering whether extended study leave is appropriate for vulnerable students.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion