Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Young

  • Postcode verified

    S2 2JQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserobusteffectivelyrigorouspreciselyclear
Criticismineffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings202w0
  • Leadership540w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Full report text

Helen Whitehead Headteacher Sheffield Inclusion Centre Spring Lane Sheffield S2 2JQ

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Sheffield Inclusion Centre

Following my visit to your school on 2 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Sheffield Inclusion Centre

This visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in March 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, the Chair of the Management Board and a local authority representative. Documents, including the local authority’s statement of action and the centre’s improvement plans were evaluated. The inspector also briefly visited several classes at the Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4 site.

p.1

Context

Five teachers have resigned since the March inspection, including three team leaders. A permanent assistant headteacher has been appointed for the primary unit and temporary staff are covering the posts of the staff that have already left. However, there are four vacant posts and three members of staff are absent due to maternity leave.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders accepted the judgement that the centre requires special measures but some staff found this message a bitter pill to swallow. This denial slowed the initial impetus of change and improvement. Valuable time was taken up making it plain to staff just how deep-rooted the problems and the issues afflicting this complex centre’s various provisions were and how ineffective certain practices had been. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com Having given staff this ‘reality check’, the headteacher has shared her vision for a viable future for the centre and secured the backing of the majority of staff, who recognise the urgency with which the centre must begin to provide substantially better value for money as a service. Momentum is increasing and a raft of new

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

procedures and strategies aimed at kick-starting the centre’s recovery have been launched. Staffing has been restructured to meet the needs of the students better and improve management efficiency. The curriculum has been radically altered to ensure it complies with requirements and is better matched to students’ stage of development and interests. More robust assessment and monitoring systems are now in place so that students’ rates of progress can be tracked precisely. There is also ongoing training to boost the quality of teaching and equip staff to carry out their roles more effectively. Measures to improve behaviour and raise attendance levels are also being rolled out. Leaders are being robust in challenging inadequacy and have adopted routine and rigorous monitoring and evaluation of all aspects of the centre’s work. On the next monitoring visit, the litmus test will be whether the centre can show inspectors clear evidence of meaningful improvement as a result of

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The management committee now has a host of experienced educationalists who can offer the necessary challenge and support to influence the centre’s rapid improvement strategically. An external review of governance is ongoing but there is evidence from the minutes of meetings that governors are operating more effectively than before, and scrutinising and questioning closely what is happening in all parts of the centre.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority is delivering more focused challenge and support to the centre than it has shown before. It brokered a partnership with a teaching school and the associated teaching alliance is supporting training and development in each of the centre’s deficit areas. The authority has also set up a steering group to monitor and evaluate the centre’s progress in tackling its key issues. It is also providing the services of several consultants, including an executive headteacher to accelerate the centre’s removal from special measures. This major intervention is necessary.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s recently redrafted improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Management Board and the Interim Executive Director, Children, Young People and Families, Sheffield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion