Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Sage

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Sage

  • Postcode verified

    BA14 9EH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrengthsexceptionallyhigh-qualityaccurateenthusiasmengagingclearconsistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Andy Packer Headteacher The John of Gaunt School Wingfield Road Trowbridge BA14 9EH

p.1

School

Following my visit to your academy on 5 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders and two members of the academy’s governing body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy’s self-evaluation and action plan were evaluated. We discussed the academy’s analysis of the monitoring of students’ progress and of the quality of teaching. We also undertook a series of observations together, visiting lessons and talking with students in a wide range of subjects.

p.1

Context

The academy is strengthening the senior leadership team by adding two further assistant headteachers through the internal promotion. They will both focus on further improvements in teaching and learning. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5316 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : Shannyn.sachse@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

 The academy’s accurate tracking data indicates that the already good overall achievement of students will improve again this year. Senior leaders are fully aware of the need to raise even further the achievement of the most able students and that of those eligible for support through the pupil premium.  In the lessons visited during the visit, students were taking an active part in their learning. They were working with interest and enthusiasm because teaching was lively and engaging.  Teachers have been supported through well-targeted professional development with a clear focus on the key aspects of teaching that the academy has identified that need to become more consistently good. As a result, more teaching is now good or better. The academy has set challenging targets for further improvement in the quality of teaching; it is well on track to achieve these.  Discussions with students and with staff confirm the academy’s strengths in

p.2

Main findings

looking after the personal needs of all of its students exceptionally well.  The academy’s senior leaders focus relentlessly on improving students’ achievement, while maintaining the academy’s strengths in the all-round care of its students. Self-evaluation is accurate. The high-quality action plan is sharply focused on those groups whose achievement needs to improve.  Governors are absolutely clear about the academy’s strengths and the areas that require further improvement. They have the depth of understanding and skills to hold senior leaders to account well.  The academy has the capacity to secure the further improvement required.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 increase the frequency the formal reviews of students’ progress to support the on-gong monitoring of their achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The academy makes full use of its status as a ‘community academy’ to foster and promote a wide range of links with its local and wider community to benefit its students. It maintains close links with the local authority and makes good use of its services. The academy works in collaboration with a wide range of other local schools, not least its partner primary academies, to share best practice. A significant proportion of students in the academy have complex learning and other needs; the academy works with all available partners to help to ensure that these students do as well as they can.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Education Funding Agency and the Director of Children’s Services for Wiltshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion